Читайте также: |
|
LETTER 1(Claim for inferiority to sample)
April 23, 20...
Export Division
Inter Coffee, Inc.
1677 Sea Harbor Drive
Orlando, Florida 35509
USA
Gentlemen:
Contract No 345
We have examined the consignment of Coffee shipped by m/v Victoria against Contract no. 345 and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract we find that the Goods are inferior to the sample on the basis of which the contract was concluded.
After a thorough examination of the Coffee we have to make the following claim on you. We believe that 5,000 bags of Coffee shipped by m/v Victoria sold to us as Santos Coffee New York Type No.2 contain excessive quantity of unripe[1], shelly[2], broken, weevily[3] and defective beans and correspond to Santos Coffee New York Type No. 3/4.
We are therefore claiming from you the amount of $ 7,200 being the price divergence between Santos New York Type 2 and Santos New York Type 3/4 of $36.20 per 50 kilos on 5,000 bags weighing 300 metric tonnes.
Please inform us if you agree to grant us this allowance.
Yours sincerely
Susan Kohen
Managing Director
LETTER 2 (Reply to Claim)
April 10, 20...
Ms Susan Kohen
Welsh Trading Company, Ltd
56 West Road
Cardiff
CF4 2FT
Dear Sirs
Contract No 345
We acknowledge receipt of the letter of April 8, 20... claiming an allowance of 1.20 dollars per kilo on 5,000 bags of Coffee shipped by m/v Victoria.
We have carefully examined the samples from this consignment and offer you, without prejudice, an allowance of 75 US cents per 50 kilos in full settlement of your claim.
Failing your acceptance of this offer, the claim will be submitted to arbitration.
Yours sincerely
George Wollen
Sales Manager
LETTER 3 (Claim for missing goods)
May 15, 20...
Kitchen-Ware Supplies, Ltd.
Cotton Road
Exeter
England EX4 9DT
Dear Sirs
Order No 153
We refer to our order (No 153) for China-Ware. Our agent took delivery of the consignment in accordance with the instructions contained in your advice of despatch.
Unfortunately, only 1800 cups were despatched. The 2000 saucers, packed separately according to our instructions, arrived in good order and condition. However, they are not much use to us without the missing 200 cups.
There is a clear discrepancy between the packing lists which arrived and your invoice. Whether there has been pilferage or not is a matter for the Lloyd’s agent, who is investigating the matter at the moment.
We must ask you to arrange for the despatch of replacements for the missing cups at once, as we must meet the delivery time agreed upon with our own customers.
Yours sincerely
Robert Leclerc
LETTER 4 (Reply to Claim)
May 16, 20...
Mr Lecrerc
Lournier, SA
Rue de Rivoli
Paris
Dear Sirs
Order No 153
We have received your letter of September 4, 20... concerning the above-mentioned order. We regret that you did not receive the whole consignment of China Ware.
Our Forwarding Agents have informed us that the crates (Nos. 15-17) were left behind at the warehouse of the Port of London. They are arranging for the despatch of the three crates short-shipped on board the m/v Catherine which is to arrive in Marseilles on May 18, 20....
We apologize for the inconvenience caused by this short-shipment which was due to circumstances beyond our control. We will contact our Forwarding Agents and the port authorities to prevent delays occurring in this way in future.
Yours sincerely
Michael Brown
Managing Director
Дата добавления: 2015-09-04; просмотров: 45 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
You underlined in your letter dt Oct 12 that _____ delivery is essential. | | | FOCUS 2. COMMENTARY AND VOCABULARY NOTES |