Читайте также: |
|
Source | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-Ratio | P-Value |
Model | 69227,4 | 69227,4 | 296,66 | 0,0000 | |
Residual | 4200,39 | 233,355 | |||
Total (Corr.) | 73427,8 |
Correlation Coefficient = -0,970977
R-squared = 94,2796 percent
R-squared (adjusted for d.f.) = 93,9618 percent
Standard Error of Est. = 15,276
Mean absolute error = 12,4017
Durbin-Watson statistic = 0,17058 (P=0,0000)
Lag 1 residual autocorrelation = 0,715
The StatAdvisor
The output shows the results of fitting a linear model to describe the relationship between В and N. The equation of the fitted model is
В = 216,032 - 10,203*N
Since the P-value in the ANOVA table is less than 0,05, there is a statistically significant relationship between В and N at the 95,0% confidence level.
The R-Squared statistic indicates that the model as fitted explains 94,2796% of the variability in В. The correlation coefficient equals -0,970977, indicating a relatively strong relationship between the variables. The standard error of the estimate shows the standard deviation of the residuals to be 15,276. This value can be used to construct prediction limits for new observations by selecting the Forecasts option from the text menu.
The mean absolute error (MAE) of 12,4017 is the average value of the residuals. The Durbin-Watson (DW) statistic tests the residuals to determine if there is any significant correlation based on the order in which they occur in your data file. Since the P-value is less than 0,05, there is an indication of possible serial correlation at the 95,0% confidence level. Plot the residuals versus row order to see if there is any pattern that can be seen.
Comparison of Alternative Models
Model | Correlation | R-Squared |
Exponential | -0,9995 | 99,91% |
Reciprocal-Y squared-X | 0,9988 | 99,77% |
Square root-X | -0,9965 | 99,30% |
Squared-Y logarithmic-X | -0,9938 | 98,76% |
Square root-Y | -0,9926 | 98,52% |
Logarithmic-X | -0,9863 | 97,29% |
Logarithmic-Y square root-X | -0,9841 | 96,84% |
Logarithmic-Y squared-X | -0,9729 | 94,65% |
Linear | -0,9710 | 94,28% |
Reciprocal-Y | 0,9677 | 93,64% |
Squared-Y square root-X | -0,9608 | 92,32% |
Square root-Y squared-X | -0,9361 | 87,63% |
Multiplicative | -0,9284 | 86,20% |
Squared-Y reciprocal-X | 0,9085 | 82,54% |
Squared-Y | -0,9010 | 81,18% |
Squared-X | -0,8874 | 78,76% |
Reciprocal-Y logarithmic-X | 0,8269 | 68,38% |
Reciprocal-X | 0,8257 | 68,17% |
Double squared | -0,7774 | 60,44% |
Square root-Y reciprocal-X | 0,7687 | 59,10% |
S-curve model | 0,7040 | 49,55% |
Double reciprocal | -0,5699 | 32,48% |
Double square root | <no fit> | |
Reciprocal-Y square root-X | <no fit> | |
Square root-Y logarithmic-X | <no fit> | |
Logistic | <no fit> | |
Log probit | <no fit> |
The StatAdvisor
This table shows the results of fitting several curvilinear models to the data. Of the models fitted, the exponential model yields the highest R-Squared value with 99,9054%. This is 5,62584% higher than the currently selected linear model. To change models, select the Analysis Options dialog box.
График остатков:
Пересчитаем в экспонентациальную модель
Simple Regression - В vs. N
Dependent variable: В
Independent variable: N
Exponential model: Y = exp(a + b*X)
Дата добавления: 2015-09-06; просмотров: 112 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Коэффициент детерминации | | | Coefficients |