Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатика
ИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханика
ОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторика
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансы
ХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Creating a “European Federation”, economic, cultural and military alliance

Читайте также:
  1. A politically incorrect guide to the lynching of multiculturalist traitors (phase 2 and 3)
  2. A short history of military medals and decorations
  3. After a successful operation - countering the misinformation campaign from the multiculturalist government – martyrdom or prison
  4. Armed (military) Jihad
  5. B. The Western European multiculturalist regimes subsidise multiculturalist newspapers
  6. Consolidating moderate (non-military) European cultural conservative organisations – phase 1 and 2
  7. Consolidating the moderate cultural conservative forces of Europe

 

It may be constructive to consider creating a federation (just like the early days of the EU/NATO) with secondary membership (A and B members) based on fixed factors (ranging from cultural, economical etc.). However, this will depend heavily on if each newly liberated sovereign country will allow an open border policy. It is likely that regional open border policies will be allowed based on historical cultural and economical factors (f example the Nordic countries are very close culturally and may allow this).

 

The European Federation of the future must no longer be envisaged in the mushy, ungovernable forms of the present European Union, which is a powerless Medusa, unable to control its borders, and dominated by the mania of cultural deconstruction, free-trade, and subject to American cultural domination. We need to imagine a grande monocultural Europe, based on the cultural and economical cooperation of independent countries that will in a larger degree be inseparably linked to Russia. Having no need to be aggressive toward its neighbours because it would be un-attackable, such a bloc would become the premier world power (in a world partitioned into large blocs), self-centered, pan-nationalistic and opposed to all the dangerous dogmas now associated with globalism/multiculturalism. The new European Federation will be much more isolationalist with a policy of economic nationalism (protectionism). It would have the capacity to practice the 'autarky of great spaces' (economic self-sufficiency and independence from foreign markets) whose principles have already been worked out by the Noble Prize winning economist, Maurice Allais. The destiny of the European peninsula cannot be separated from continental Russia, for both ethno-cultural and geopolitical reasons. It’s absolutely imperative for America’s mercantile thalassocracy (naval supremacy, in either military or commercial senses of the word) to prevent the birth of the culturally and ideologically confident European Federation.

 

 

- Current EU countries (+ Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Andorra etc.)

- Russia (Their partnership, friendship and support is essential).

- Belarus (potential admission)

- Ukraine (potential)

- Moldova (potential)

- Georgia (potential)

- Croatia

- Serbia

- FYROM (potential)

 

 

Non-European territories/countries that may seek admission:

 

- Armenia

- Israel (potential)

 

 

And the following potential European and non-European territories:

 

 

- The Serbian/Croatian territory currently known as Bosnia Herzegovina

- The Greek/Croatian/Serbian/Albanian territory currently known as Albania

- The Greek territory currently known as Western Anatolia (Turkey)

- The Greek-Cypriot territory currently known as Northern Cyprus (Turkey)

- The Armenian territory currently known as Eastern Anatolia (Turkey)

 

 


Дата добавления: 2015-07-17; просмотров: 129 | Нарушение авторских прав


Читайте в этой же книге: A politically incorrect guide to the lynching of multiculturalist traitors (phase 2 and 3) | Best investments during phase 2 (2030-2070), predicting the future | Traditional militia building | Types of coups d’état | If you could save 1000 individuals by sacrificing 100 people - would you contribute to indirectly kill these 100? | US policy when EU and/or NATO countries are attacked | The cultural/economical American Empire - dealing with a tyrant - why the Democratic and the Republican Party cannot be trusted | Past US interventions | Phase 3, 2070 - 2090 | Appeasing the extreme liberals |
<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Distinguishing between cultural Christendom and religious Christendom – reforming our suicidal Church| From liberation to consolidation towards the European Federation

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.005 сек.)