Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатика
ИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханика
ОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторика
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансы
ХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Appeasing the extreme liberals

 

Let’s be realistic. Less than 10% of a country’s population are extreme Marxists and less than 10% are extreme cultural conservatives. The great bulk of our people are moderate people who just want the right of self determination and the opportunity to live a happy and meaningful life. It is our task to provide everyone the opportunities they desire as long as it doesn’t severely undermine the long term sustainability/stability of the country.

 

A Marxist is always a liberal (except for the authoritarians) but a liberal is not always a Marxist. There is a great deal of liberal individuals who want unrestrained freedoms for themselves while some radically conservative want to live like the Amish. The challenge is finding a sustainable and optimal balance.

 

The following suggestion will contribute to reconciliation between a majority of people:

 

Create inner city zones where extreme liberals will be offered to live and work. These zones should have regulated/controlled entry points. Everyone leaving and entering will be registered to avoid excessive cultural contamination:

 

There should be at least one of these liberal zones per country (extreme Las Vegas style). Suggested liberal zone regulation:

 

 

- Radically liberal in regards to moral and ethical standards

- Unrestricted access to alcohol, marihuana, prostitution and entertainment (hard drugs will still be illegal).

- Unrestricted possibilities for artistical, sexual, cultural expression (exceptions are political messages that indirectly/directly undermine the best interest of the nation state such as many Marxist political doctrines).

- Alternative schools – providing that they are residents in the zone (up for consideration).

- Separate media – radically liberal – no censorship (with exception of political propaganda). Access to the liberal media networks will be limited to residents of the liberal zone to avoid unnecessary cultural contamination.

Points may be added or ignored based on future circumstances and other considerations.

What do to with all the discontent moderate Marxists?

Keep in mind that many of these individuals are victim of four decades of multicultural (cultural Marxist) indoctrination and should not be considered enemies of the state (with the exception of category A, B and C traitors). A majority of moderate Marxists is likely to choose to live in liberal zones.

 

 

Eastern Europe

 


Дата добавления: 2015-07-17; просмотров: 108 | Нарушение авторских прав


Читайте в этой же книге: Consolidation is survival, apathy means death | From clandestine cells to more advanced military movements | A politically incorrect guide to the lynching of multiculturalist traitors (phase 2 and 3) | Best investments during phase 2 (2030-2070), predicting the future | Traditional militia building | Types of coups d’état | If you could save 1000 individuals by sacrificing 100 people - would you contribute to indirectly kill these 100? | US policy when EU and/or NATO countries are attacked | The cultural/economical American Empire - dealing with a tyrant - why the Democratic and the Republican Party cannot be trusted | Past US interventions |
<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Phase 3, 2070 - 2090| Distinguishing between cultural Christendom and religious Christendom – reforming our suicidal Church

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.007 сек.)