Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатика
ИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханика
ОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторика
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансы
ХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

If you could save 1000 individuals by sacrificing 100 people - would you contribute to indirectly kill these 100?

Читайте также:
  1. Acting, and she could not resist what might very well be his dying request.
  2. Actress in England. There are only three people who bring money into the
  3. Crimes against the indigenous peoples of Western Europe - 1960-2010
  4. Democracy has a tendency to divide people
  5. Eminent K.C. who says clever, witty things and turns people round his little
  6. Finish each of these sentences in such a way that it means exactly the same as the sentence printed before it.
  7. General demands from the people which are covered in the above policies

 

Every rational individual knows the only answer to this. Unfortunately 70% of females and 30% of men are simply unable to make this decision. Decades of pacifist indoctrination have made them simply unable to defend themselves. Let’s refer to this group of society as the ”pacifists”.

 

This is the political reality we are being forced to cope with, so you should be aware of the expected political circumstances even when a people are close to obliteration.

 

A good illustration is the political climate in Israel at the moment (March 09). The main Israeli attacks on the Syrians (referred to as Palestinians by the mass media) have ended. These actions of self defence were initiated after a continuous rain of rockets for years.

 

Here is the result from the Israeli election (categorised in regards to the Muslim/Jewish conflict):

 

 

Moderate/liberal:

Kadima (Tzipi Livni): 28 mandates (-1)

Labour Party: (Ehud Barak): 13 (-6)

Total: 41

 

Neutral

Shas (religious) 11

 

Right wing:

Likud (Netanyahu): 27 (+15)

Yisrael Beiteinu: 15 (+4)

Total: 42

 

Other parties:

 

United Torah Judaism: 5

United Arab List–Ta'al: 4

National Union: 4

Hadash: 4

New Movement-Meretz: 3

The Jewish Home: 3

Balad: 3

 

Total number of Knesset seats: 120

It’s worth noting that Netanyahu has already found allies in right wing Yisrael Beiteinu and in the religious Shas but has avoided creating a right wing alliance because he knows it would collide with the US Obama administration.

 

I have to agree on the current strategy. The political climate of the world does simply not allow small right wing players to exercise any form of power as long as the EU and the US are controlled by cultural Marxists/multiculturalists. However, the interesting thing is that it shows that a nation under distress and literally where it is ”raining rockets” is still considerably moderate/liberal due to ”pacifists”.

 

It’s also important to note that the Israeli illustration (of political climate) is not really comparable to any Western European country. The reason is that Israel has a very small group of Muslims who are eligible to vote. In contrast, the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Western European countries have given most of the Muslim residents the right to vote. In fact, Muslims as a voter group and political block is a significant one and their importance in European politics increase from year to year.

 

As we have discussed so many times before, the problem arises when you add the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, the suicidal humanists, the globalist capitalists, the pacifists and the Muslim Block. It is simply impossible to compete democratically with this alliance. Even less so in the future when the cultural Marxists have imported hundreds of thousands of new voters, and Muslims in general give birth to new generations of voters.

 

We have lost the democratic battle of Europe. It is unrealistic to believe that we can save Europe through democratic struggle from a future reality where Muslims will be in the majority. The democratic battle for Europe was probably lost before year 2000 (theoretically, and differing based on country ofc), which is around 40 years after the EU’s Eurabia project was initiated.

 

 

Dialogue with the MA (Multiculturalist Alliance) - aprox 1960-1999

 

Obviously, there is still a democratic struggle ongoing (from moderate non-violent forces) and this will continue in tandem with the armed struggle until we succeed.

 

 

Western European Civil War Phase 3


Дата добавления: 2015-07-17; просмотров: 132 | Нарушение авторских прав


Читайте в этой же книге: Essential administrative objectives - specified | Creating a European database – the mapping of category A and B traitors | Using Facebook and other social networking sites as a platform to consolidate and grow the European resistance movement | Online “recruiters” for patriotic armed resistance movements/8th front – a primary administrative tasks | Teach your children the truth and do not allow them to be indoctrinated by cultural Marxist/multiculturalist propaganda | Consolidation is survival, apathy means death | From clandestine cells to more advanced military movements | A politically incorrect guide to the lynching of multiculturalist traitors (phase 2 and 3) | Best investments during phase 2 (2030-2070), predicting the future | Traditional militia building |
<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Types of coups d’état| US policy when EU and/or NATO countries are attacked

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.005 сек.)