Where does the activity of Belarusian atomic lobbyists leads?

Not waiting (or may be not hoping) for the consent of Belarusian people to disposition of atomic energy sites, supporters of development in Republic of this kind of energy aspire “to stake out” behind a back of people ways for realization of their plans. We shall result some examples of it.

In 1993, before adoption by Government of solution on the Program [7] representatives of Belarus, Canada and Russia signed the Protocol on utilization in Belarus of the Canadian reactor “CANDU”. In five years, Canadians have recognized this reactor unconformable to modern demands on safety. Is permissible to ask: how much would cost this “operation” of atomic lobbyists if for these years the arrangement under the design “CANDU” began to be realized?

The interesting moment: even in engineering specifications ([28], 1995) on reconstruction of Berezovskaya state district power station with its transfer on steam-gaseous systems that has no even the slightest attitude to atomic energy, fragments of atomic philosophy of ours atomic lobbyists “are literally squeezed”. In addition, it is felt, that they cannot bear it any longer.

One more plot. On June 30 1998, the Protocol of Intents with representatives of the Archangelsk region about building in Belarus of power plants based on ship atomic reactors was signed in Minsk. In addition, it was made literally before the first meeting of the Governmental Commission built specially for an assessment of expediency of development of atomic energy in Belarus. Whether the beginning of committee work was deliberately temporised (more than for three months) before signing this Protocol? Very similar on it.

It was necessary to add to this «power pushing through» of nuclear programs, concepts and designs in 1994 and 1996 through Government and Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences around of standards of the generally accepted rules and without the official conclusions required in this case.

Chiefs of the atomic power program of Belarus affirm that the problem of financing of construction of the nuclear power plant in our country is easily solvable, as many countries and firms are ready to participate in it actively. This variant is not eliminated, as «loss of rate» in development of world atomic energy was thorough impact on those countries and firms, which before had the highest profits, supplying all worlds with the equipment for the nuclear power plants. For them now it is extremely important to pull out from developed dead spot – is a question “to be or not to be”. In addition, they will regret nothing that the country most suffering from Chernobyl accident – Belarus has made a first step towards to new rise of atomic energy.

The variant of construction for us of the nuclear power plant at the expense of the interested firms is not eliminated even. However, it is even more hazardous, than a free cheese in a mousetrap. Having confused with such original “gift” the amateurs of free cheese, get involved hereafter in completely unreasonable and excessive expenditure of a means for the country. To follow them, knowing that 2/3 countries having the nuclear power plant completely stopped their construction means to commit an inexcusable error.

It is necessary to approach to an assessment of any offers even apparent extremely tempting, from the exclusively economic evaluations. It is not necessary to forget about aged and wise admonition: «I fear Greeks even when they bring gifts ».

One more very interesting plot. We already spoke you, that the Government of Belarus built the Commission for establishment of expediency of development in our country of atomic energy. This Commission should give away the conclusion until January 1 1999. The last meeting of the Commission has taken place on December 29 1998. On it was accepted to postpone solution for 10 years on any operations on construction of the nuclear power plant. Has pro-voted 19 person, including the Chairman of the Commission the Vice-president of the Academy of sciences P.A.Vitjaz, contra - 6 person. It would seem, that all has become on the places. Signing of the Conclusion of the Commission has been assigned to December 31. And suddenly in this interspaced, that is on December, 30, the meeting of Presidium of the National Academy of sciences has taken place on which on presentation of the director of Institute of Problems of energetic A.A.Mihalevich being the member of that Commission, and at the presence of academician P.A.Vitjaz it is adopted a proposal: “To recognize, that technical, ecological both economic premises and parameters of reliability of modern designs of the nuclear power plant testify to expediency of their inclusion in a power supply system of Belarus”.

Whether it is necessary to speak that all these “confessions” have no the slightest scientific basis under themselves. It is a frank juggling, and it is even easier - lie. However, the most terrible consists that lie, the juggling and a misinterpretation proceed from the highest scientific institute of Belarus, from its Academy of sciences. The price of this unique «scientific adherence to principles» you can define by yourself. Top of cynicism was that on December 31 as anything happened, in P.A.Vitjaz’s cabinet passed signing of the Conclusion of the Commission. In addition, words that diametrically opposite solution on the eve were accepted. It really “adherence to principles”!

For point of the Conclusion of the Commission on the 10-years moratorium on building of atomic energy in Belarus has voted 19 members of the Commission, including the Chairman of the Commission academician P.A.Vitjaz, against – seven. At signing the closing document from 32 people, only eight members of the Commission have not agreed with establishment of the moratorium. It is possible to consider, that it – fixed victory of forces of reason. However, it is impossible to calm yourself in any way.

Similar, supporters of atomic energy are ready to make any efforts, reacting even with the unlawful methods to bypass solution on the moratorium and “to please” the international atomic lobby, having forced the country to go for them on a halter. Thus, they are not considered even with that danger which it can bring to country and people.

Frankly speaking, so unprecedented persistence of ours atomic lobbyists in pushing through of idea of building in Belarus this most dangerous branch of energetic, persistence, adjoining with categorical impudence and impudent dishonourableness, involuntarily suggest that they personally extract from this any benefit for themselves. In addition, not small benefit: they diligently attempt to lead into error all on that their financial well being depends.

Such activity of developers of the atomic program, whom are not counting with any principles of decency both a scientific correctness, and their operations finding in the complete contravention with generally accepted standards and the rules, testify not to force, and about manifestative asthenia of their items.

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14