Switzerland. And at what here Chernobyl?

For many years, the global nuclear lobby strenuously aspires to captivate the Planet Earth with the most dangerous in a history of Humankind structures named “peace” nuclear power plants. Thirty-year experience of dialogue with these plants has confirmed danger of nuclear power plants to all alive on the Earth. In addition, danger arises not only in an event of rather often accidents, but also in a routine operational regime. It was clarified also, that these plants have no any of advantages, which are persistently advertised by atomic lobbyists all over the world.

Belarus has no nuclear power plants on its territory. However, it has not saved it from the most severe consequences of catastrophe on the Chernobyl nuclear power plant happened on territory of neighbouring country. The most powerful “tongue” of radioactive emissions has put on territory of Belarus on more than 240 kms from the blown up reactor. The area of the contaminated territory of Belarus has appeared greater, than the area of all territories of such country, as the Swiss Confederated states. Wars bypassed this country glorified by the neutrality. However, Chernobyl does not know borders. Chernobyl stains are found practically in all countries of Europe. Chernobyl was not counted and with the neutral status of Switzerland, situated from almost in two thousand kilometres. In accordance with the Atlas of contamination of Europe by caesium after Chernobyl accident series of places in the south of Switzerland has appeared contaminated up to the levels which are coming nearer to 3 Curie per square kilometre. Let’s remind, that under Chernobyl laws of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia to territories with radioactive contamination are referred all territories with the density of contamination above 1 Curie per square kilometre. And Chernobyl “has presented” with such density of contamination one of resort regions of Switzerland. It, as they say, “gift” from far Ukraine. Is everything OK in the Switzerland?

In connection with atomic energy in Switzerland, there was rather original position. In 1990 in this country the 10-years moratorium that is against construction of the nuclear power, plant [6] has been accepted. In 1997 was accepted solution to refuse from use of atomic energy to 2030. For Switzerland – country of health resorts, including the famous and most popular mounting skiing resorts in the world, the alpine tourist and sports - climbing bases, such solutions look quite natural. For countries with resort-tourist trend of the basic revenues of the budget ecological purity of territory is determinative factor, involving fertile for country torrent of visitors. Swiss’s sustain image of the purest resort territories very diligently. In many places, even entry of automobile motor vehicles is forbidden. Carriage of loads, travel of tourists and having rest in these places is affected on express electric trains and electro mobiles. Any contamination by waste products of benzene or diesel oil should not be there. And here – radiation contamination! Furthermore, from very far nuclear power plant.

In addition, the own nuclear power plants are much closer. For today in country, work five reactors. For such small country (the area 41.288 square kilometres) it is a lot. The territory of defeat from explosion of one Chernobyl reactor only in Belarus is close to 48 thousand sq. km that exceeds the area of all Switzerland. The density of the population in Switzerland is in 3,5 times more, than in Belarus. And if in Belarus has suffered more than two millions person at population density of Switzerland it is interconvertible more than to seven millions person. The population of this country makes 6.905 thousand people. Furthermore, the proximate neighbours of Switzerland Germany and France have taken care of it too, having arranged the reactors in “striking distances” from borders of country. Similar, those citizens of Switzerland have a lot to think about.

However, alas, have not thought, or atomic lobbyists blunted their heads. On past referendum, citizens of country have refused earlier accepted and undoubtedly reasonable solutions and have agreed with the further development of atomic energy. It is necessary to express only regret to Swiss, submit to the influence of international atomic mafia of absolute reliability of atomic reactors and of their doubtless economic advantage. Once in fact and we trusted these myths. But, fortunately, except for Switzerland more than any country, wished to leave atomic energy, has not regretted about the solution.

And it would be desirable to remind of something to citizens of Switzerland, to warn them as dangerously to trust to atomic lobbyists. In opinion of leading scientists and experts of the world nuclear technologies for production of nuclear fuel and electrical power are the most hazardous, unpredictable and most expensive technologies which were ever known to humankind. Nuclear reactors are highly radioactive, as alongside with production of power in them permanently are formed transuranium elements and the highly radioactive fission fragments rendering damage effect on living organisms during hundreds and thousand of years. Disposal of these waste products conducts to loss of the big territories and does not give warranty that these hazardous substances “not will get out” somewhere. Release into the atmosphere of radioactive substances descends not only in an event of accidents, but also at “normal” exploitation of the reactor. Not casually, academician P.L.Kapitsa has equated the nuclear power plant to “the atomic bomb giving an electricity”. Switzerland already has five “charges” or «atomic mines», mine-strewn by their hands in its territory. Is not it enough for the small territory of country? Unless the hazards of such neighbourhood can be justified by something? Unless citizens of country are interested in construction of additional dangerous objects?

Furthermore, nuclear power plants are not only very hazardous in themselves, but they also are very vulnerable for any internal or external interference. They are capable to blow up and on own will, but, even more probably, because of irresponsible service or because of casual or deliberate external action.

It would be necessary to listen to opinion of not atomic lobbyists, but those honest and responsible scientists and experts who try to make the truth about atomic energy clear to people and about what dirty and hazardous trace is abandoned by it to the future generations of the planet Earth.

One of substantial ways of solution of power problems without utilization of the most dangerous nuclear technologies is shown to world by Germany. Though this country also falls into to number of countries with slight wind resources, already in 2004 the total output of the electric power by wind energy installations has overlapped more than 30% of amount of the power produced by nuclear power plants of country. It is important, that for 15 years simple capacity of positioned windmills has increased more than in ten times and makes today 1500 and more kilowatts. Each such unit is already decent power plant. Impressing result. And in fact Swiss wind energy resources are not less, but considerably bigger than in Germany.

Interesting detail: Austria, adjoining with Switzerland, being a haven of the pro-nuclear organization – IAEA, nevertheless has refused from atomic energy. Citizens of Switzerland should follow an example of Austria. In addition, it is not necessary to forget that the Swiss Confederated states fall into to group of countries, the most responsive to any, even to small negative impact on environment.

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14