Kenesary Kasymov

The causes and course of the uprising.

On the 20th of the XIX century, some Senior Zhuz,southern regions of Middle and Junior zhuzes

were under the rule of Kokand and Khiva Beks. In an effort to consolidate its rule,

Kokand rulers collected taxes from the Kazakhs, what caused discontent.

In 20-30s of the XIX century the Khiva Khanate in the lower reaches of the Syr Darya erected several fortresses.Khiva campaigns violate the peaceful life of Kazakh villages and looting caravans negatively

impact on the economy. This led to protests.

Dissatisfaction increased the seizure of land and also to create new orders in the districts of

Charter in 1822, resulting in worsened conditions for farming and ranching.

All this has led to an uprising led by 1837-47.It was head by Kenesary Kasim-uly. The main purpose uprising of Kenesary Kasim-uly preserve autonomy but not incorporated into Tsarist Russia and the termination regions of Kazakhstan Kazakh land colonization by building fortresses.

Rebellion Kenesary Kasim-uly seized nearly all of Kazakhstan. Actively participated in the revolt

Kazakhs of all three zhuzes. This is the only uprising in the history of liberation movements in the late XVIII and in XIX century which swept all the major areas of Kazakh tribes.

In September 1841 representatives of the three Kazakh zhuzes elected Kenesary Kasymov as a Khan.

Kazakh Khanate was restored. In August 1841 the rebels laid siege to the fortress Sozak,

Zhanakorgan, Ak-Mosque Zhulek, where they were struck by large forces Kokand.

Contributed to the defeat of the revolt as a political and intrageneric divisions

Kazakhs, the lack of support next feudal groups.

The reasons for the defeat of the uprising Kenesary Kasimov were:

1)intrageneric divisions of the Kazakhs;

2)lack of support for some of the feudal groups. Sultans and Bies have received many benefits from the imperial government of the Russian Empire, were not interested in creating a centralized feudal state;

3)crushed by zhuzs, Kazakh clans supported the uprising mainly within its limits;

4)Kenesary arbitrariness and violence with tough not support him auls were not in the traditions of the Kazakhs;

5) Kenesary not able to unite together the struggle against tsarist Russia, Bukhara and Kokand lords.

The largest national liberation uprising of Kazakh people in the XIX century. Aiming

restoration of the feudal state of Khan, and this time ended in defeat,

leaving an indelible mark in the memory of the peoples of Central Asia and Kazakhstan.

The historical significance of the uprising is great:

1. It was the largest uprising against colonial oppression, swept all three Horde;

2. it was part of the liberation struggle in Russia in the first half of the XIX

century;

3. shows the dependence of the internal contradictions of the Kazakh society from a policy of tsarism.

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14