Personal view – problem of reduction emissions

Summing up my Research Project, I realized that the main issue of reduction emissions is not a reduction, but is the ways to disappoint people with new regulations, new rules or even new markets, to invest money and in output of it don’t make anything.

How it is possible to reduce emissions by making Kyoto Protocol and leave main emitters outside of it?

Why Trading System became an arena of speculators and instead of reasonable help, it became a place of easy money earnings, while emission’s level growing up?

Finally, spending so much money for beautiful cars, yachts and penthouses, people avoid to invest their money to scientific researches or technology to find new fuel resources, or find the way how to use GHG emissions in industry, for example as raw material and on molecular level destroy them and in the same time create materials on output without any emission?

Answer is simple – every one cares only for his budget and needs.

Returning to Chapter 1, were clearly explain the problem of the environmental shipping impact: “ There are several options, but at present most of them are not economically viable. “ And it will be always not economical, if people would not understand, than in future, when it will be too late to change something, paper, that called “ money ” will not safe them in front of planetary disaster.

Kyoto Protocol was poorly serviced and was not global, which makes mistake from beginning. Such implementation must be global and mandatory to every state and nation. In that way, reduction of emissions would be seen more clearly and if anyone is “cheating” – might be much easier to find who cheat and give penalties to that region.

“Cap and Trade” – in my view, it’s the main engine of increased level of emissions. This system shows again, that human thinks only how to became rich, making money from nothing in one hand, while emit double, triple times more every day in other hand and not afraid for penalties from Carbon Tax or any other Emission Inspection – “ he is covered ” from ETS.

However, there are and positive side from last 5 years of reduction emissions.

After all mistakes and misunderstandings, committees try to create new way of future emission reductions and I hope they will succeed.

In my view, if I had permission to be part of discussions, I would try to forget about achievement of economy-wide emissions reduction targets, and try to solve the problem once for ever. I don’t have great knowledge of a scientist, but I believe that there is the way to reduce emissions not only from vessels, by implementing new design, different fuel, reducing speed and etc., but globally too.

My solution of reducing emissions – is reducing our needs. We produce every day so many products, different products. In our current economic situation, when a lot of people don’t have work, or salary is equal to minimum level of live, it is irrelevant to produce more than people can buy. Most of the fast expired production will be lost. But this loss would be not only economical but also as increased volume of emissions that was produced during of producing product and transferring it from factory to final destination.

My idea is to freeze production and transportation goods for couple days or weeks, until minimum level in every warehouse and storage will reach (minimum level of goods for time needed until new production will come) and start to produce and transport goods only according to population recording list in each region. This will avoid oversupply of goods, stabilize prices, and emissions would reduce slowly.

It will win some time for scientific researches for new innovations in fuel, design, or something new, that is unknown yet. In the same time, returning to shipping industry, it would be good idea to increase quantity of labour force for new building, to reduce building time for ordered vessels with new technologies and systems of controlling emission level, which must be changed with old and high level emit ships.

Of course – this idea may not achieve economical way of savings, but might be a solution not only for reducing emission, but also economy stability after crisis.

Дата добавления: 2015-07-20