Not catastrophe, not accident, and simply a fire?

(Remarks on margins of the report of the United Nations 2002)

In the assessment presented by the Secretary general of United Nations Kofi Annan is written: “The exact number of victims, maybe, never becomes known. But three million children demanding treatment and not up to 2016, but earlier, give us performance about number of those who can be ill seriously … their future life will be deformed by it, as well as their childhood. Many will die prematurely”.

The life has shown, what even at reduction of volumes of radioactivity (that inevitably occurs during natural transformation of radionuclides) radioactive contamination of people can not be reduced, and even is increasing and this is observed now everywhere in Chernobyl territories.

It is known, that radiation causes change of genetic material (mutation), and these changes of genetic material are handed down. Already therefore, unfortunately, Chernobyl radiation impact will sound during many following generations.

A deceit the statement looks, that in affected territories it is possible “ to create a favorable environment ”. Other business, as in such adverse environment is possible to adjust somehow rather safe life if to observe a lot of rules and restrictions. But the life here during centuries will demand various safety measures.

Catastrophic deterioration of health of children on all classes of illnesses in Chernobyl territories does not cause doubts: in Chernobyl territories in 1985 were more than 80% of practically healthy children and in 2000 – less than 20%. In southern, especially injured districts of the Gomel region, there are practically no healthy children.

Authors of the Report of the United Nations, recognizing, nevertheless, the lack of modern scientific knowledge affirm about “exaggeration of exposure hazard to health of the person!” Having recognized, that we do not know while all dangers, they affirm, nevertheless, that we will be safe! The authors of the Report have demonstrated ignoring of important “principle of precaution”.

Authors of the Report have gone in this respect further than nuclear scientists and instead of a word "accident" speak already simply about “a fire on Chernobyl NPP”, as a source of radionuclides.

Disastrous deterioration of a population health (and especially) through 16 flying after Chernobyl accident allows to affirm children, that they are sick not from a stress, not from a radiophobia, not from mass resettlement (in Belarus it has been moved only 140 thousand from 2 million the person, got under intensive Chernobyl outliers (releases), the same concerns also Ukraine and Russia), and from prolonged effect of low doses of radiation.

To acceptance of effective measures of protection interfere not only lack of means, but also dual and inconsistent character of state policy (the desire to spend less, and from here aspiration to hide true scales of tragedy).

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14