About safety of NPP.

Approve even, that the probability of death of the person from influence of NPP is lower, than from fall of a meteorite. Already today, thousands of people were killed by the atomic energy (and not only by Chernobyl), and meteorites killed no one.

Nuclear reactors are highly radioactive, as alongside with a power generation in them is constant and transuranic elements in plenty amounts and the highly radioactive fission fragments rendering damage effect on living organisms during hundreds and thousand years are formed.

Rather short history of atomic energy keeps huge number of unscheduled stops of reactors and thousand accidents, including such large, as Windscale (1957, the Great Britain) nowadays Sellafield, Three Mile Island (1978, the USA), Chernobyl (1986). As for year 2000 within the framework of information system on incidents of IAEA the data on more than 1.200 events that have taken place on NPP all over the world are saved.

In the world there is no NPP on which regularly there would be no accident and incidents and there is no day in year when somewhere in the world there would be no incident even on one of NPP.

The overwhelming majority of these accidents are hided behind a screen of privacy. Community of interest in this issue on the part of all owners and producers of NPP is clear. Publicity is not necessary for them: all sane people could understand that these nuclear monsters are hazardous.

And in three months prior to catastrophe besides with the griffon “confidentially” new report appeared. “In 1985, alongside with scheduled repairs in Chernobyl, emergency stops of generating sets and abandoning of the equipment on the various causes occurred, besides during year there were 26 drops of the plant capacity and consequently, the reactors, and for the first three weeks of January, 1986 - 9 times occurred. …On opinion of PRESENTER experts of the plant, each drop of power of reactors has an adverse effect on their reliability and durability.

All conversations on absolutely scanty theoretical probability of accident on future very safe reactors cost nothing. Our experts will manage and with “very safety reactors”. To speak follows not about probabilities of accidents, but about scope of consequences, which in comparison with thermal plants, can give accidents on NPP. Moreover, here “advantage” of NPP appears indisputable.

Nuclear power plants are most hazardous of the systems used for an electricity production, both on frequency of descending accidents, and on scales of consequences of these accidents.

2.2. The staff decide all … But what and how?

Alas, that is especially important, not only NPPs are hazardous, but also, those people which serve them in incomparably greater degree. Therefore, for example, atomic lobbyists strenuously repeat, that Chernobyl is extreme and extremely improbable accident that is impossible to start with it at assessments of atomic energy. It is difficult to agree, in fact Chernobyl accident not so much technogenic, but more man-made.

Even in the USA and France “the human factor” was the cause, accordingly, 80 and 86 percents of all emergencies on NPP.

Atomic reactors such as Chernobyl, to put it mildly, are not so safe. As well as all other power producers in the world. Especially, so careless operation of such reactor appears completely impermissible.

Journalists from Ukraine have got to the bottom of “terrible secret”: has appeared, that ten workers of the Rovno NPP worked on responsible engineering - executive positions from the shift man of the unit up to the senior operator of reactor branch had “false diplomas”. It appears, in what “safety” hands there can be our destiny and life!

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14