Читайте также:
|
In 1993, before adoption by Government of solution on the Program [7] representatives of Belarus, Canada and Russia signed the Protocol on utilization in Belarus of the Canadian reactor “CANDU”. In five years, Canadians have recognized this reactor unconformable to modern demands on safety.
On June 30 1998, the Protocol of Intents with representatives of the Archangelsk region about building in Belarus of power plants based on ship atomic reactors was signed in Minsk.
The variant of construction for us of the nuclear power plant at the expense of the interested firms is not eliminated even. Nevertheless, it is even more hazardous, than a free cheese in a mousetrap. It is not necessary to forget about aged and wise admonition: «I fear Greeks even when they bring gifts ».
On December 29 1998 in Belarus was accepted solution to postpone for 10 years any operations on construction of the nuclear power plant. However, supporters of atomic energy are ready to make any efforts, working with unlawful methods to bypass this moratorium and “to please” the international atomic lobby.
Such activity of developers of the atomic program, whom are not counting with any principles of decency both a scientific correctness, and their operations finding in the complete contravention with generally accepted standards and the rules, testify not to force, and about manifestative asthenia of their items.
3. Ecology of atomic energy.
3.1. “Quiet” emissions from the nuclear power plants
Even in an event of absolute reliability and absence of accidents on any nuclear power plants, gaseous and aerosol, emissions of radioactive nuclides from the operating nuclear power plant are the permitted, but they should be licensed. Therefore, for example, 434 reactors that are operating now, have the right to throw out (during 25 years of their work) and throw out caesium - 137 (one of the most hazardous radioactive nuclides!) in 16 times more, than it has been thrown out because of Chernobyl accident.
If the fuel compositions loaded into a routine power reactor, are practically safe for environment than after it is spent in a reactor it becomes lethally radioactive. Not casually speak, that an atomic reactor produces first not the electric power but Radioactive waste - the most dangerous for the person and all alive on the Planet Earth.
In 15-20 years when there will come time to close nuclear power plants, because of spending of life time, the Humankind will face most serious and complex problem, created by him – extremely huge quantity of the spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste both their noxious and lethal influence on health of people and biosphere.
In any state questions of waste disposal, decommission of the nuclear power plant, handling of the spent nuclear fuel are not decided. There is a natural question: why have started to think about development of ways of “safe disposal» of radioactive substances which unambiguously should appear during work of any atomic reactor, not before start-up of the first reactor that would be not only natural, but also simply necessary. Why scientists are engaged in it not before but after hundred thousand tons of radioactive waste has already captivated the Planet?
Will suffice, at last, to duplicate thought that the spent nuclear fuel will allow to receive “plutonium which will give power in a reactor on fast neutrons”. Reactors on fast neutrons did not remain practically in the.
Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 34 | Нарушение авторских прав
| <== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
| Whether it is possible to blow up the nuclear power plant? | | | Where to put a radioactive waste? |