Читайте также:
|
Alas, all same, only lie and juggling with each year are mixed up harshly. Even has bothered to explain them the same each time. Whether they “have gone in cycle” on all that, there is such mental disorder, like a melancholic madness (very hazardous and, similar, incurable). Whether diligently work of for a sinecure?
Plutonium is not deduced from an organism. Plutonium and its various compounds are capable to migrate actively with soil waters, with dust, with pollen of plants. Plutonium can “get out” in the most unexpected place. In the Report of the United Nations, it was no place for this serious and very hazardous problem.
About iodine special talk. It would be enough after accident to carry out prophylaxis, even with ordinary (which everyone has at home) iodine, and hundred thousand people would be rescued from hazardous influence of a radio iodine. And again no reaction to it.
About construction of a new sarcophagus. In opposite with opinion of officials there are data that in leftovers of the blown up reactor there were only 5-7 % of fuel. So, what are going to close with the new grandiose sarcophagus?
In the Report of the United Nations this aspect of Chernobyl accident, that is adoption of unreasonable solutions and huge human victims, is not reflected at all.
It is impossible to recognize efficient those measures which have not been attempted in general or were undertaken with huge delay? An example – iodine prophylaxis that have started when already there was no necessity to conduct it.
Overirradiation of people and understating of their true doses was the system, not exception. However, experts from IAEA and the World Health Organization undoubtedly are not interested in establishment of true pattern of an irradiation of workers in Chernobyl zone.
The juggling of the statistical data is one of the most widespread forms of lie. The statistics should be competent and honest, otherwise it becomes the weapon of great lie.
The report of the United Nations bypassed a problem of the international legislation. The principle “the polluter pays”, should be realized.
We could not find traces of the diligent scientific analysis in the Report of the United Nations. The purpose of the Report is not establishment of truth, but its distortion, the presentation of information, acceptable to attendants of a cult of atomic energy, and first of all for systems of IAEA and WHO.
Alas, in the Report of the United Nations “20 years after”, as well as in previous reports, it is not made the slightest attempts to tell the truth about consequences of Chernobyl accident. No, authors of this report for past years have not grown wiser! Moreover, did not become more honest!
Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 30 | Нарушение авторских прав
| <== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
| Not catastrophe, not accident, and simply a fire? | | | Touching care“ of people |