Читайте также:
|
|
Finally we must take up one more question. Why does the existence of conceptual variation, imperfect communication, and the failure of folk behaviorism not lead to the same problems for Nurturant Parent morality? To see why, return for a moment to childrearing. In the Nurturant Parent model, constant communication, interaction, and discussion are crucial. As Berry Brazelton observes over and over in Touch-points, one must always tell a child why you are doing what you are doing, ask her opinion, ask how she feels, respect her feelings, take her suggestions, while sticking to what you think needs to be done unless your child makes a better suggestion. This process requires constant communication and negotiation of meaning. It assumes that meanings will be different and that communication will be imperfect. It assumes that if you keep communicating, note communication failures, attribute respect and goodwill to both parties, and continue to communicate, you will get to the point where the differences in communication and the variations in meaning won't occur all that much, or matter all that much. What keeps the process of communication going is secure attachment, affection and affectionate behavior, mutual respect, empathy, commitment, clarity of expectations, and trust. That does not apply just to childrearing. It can apply to human interactions in general. That is what overcomes meaning-variations and imperfect communication.
What takes the place of the strict rules of the Strict Father model is clarity of expectations and empathy. What takes the place of reward and punishment is interdependence, communication, and a true desire to remain affectionately connected to those you live with.
Facing Difficulties
But what happens when the people in your community either want to dominate you or feel no affectionate connections to you or to anyone else? The only answer to date has been to do everything you can to build a nurturant community and extend it more and more to others over time. That is difficult and takes a long time and a lot of commitment and a lot of communication. But the nurturance model in general is difficult to follow and just does take a long time and a lot of commitment and a lot of communication. As with childrearing, there are no easy alternatives. But the Strict Father model is no alternative at all.
Again, as with creating a nurturant family life, it would be unreasonable to expect that creating a nurturant society should be easy or quick. One must be patient and ready to deal with frustration. And one must bear in mind the morality of happiness and self-nurturance. In the midst of frustration, you must find a way to be basically happy and to take care of yourself. If you don't, you will become less nurturant.
Women have known throughout history that nurturance is a way of life. Many men have instinctively learned it from their mothers and their nurturant fathers. But the challenge in contemporary America is to create a nurturant society when a significant portion of that society has been raised either by authoritarian or neglectful parents.
America is between moral worlds and there is only one way to turn.
Дата добавления: 2015-10-30; просмотров: 113 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Imperfect Communication | | | C. Бронхография |