Recommendations according to type of urological intervention

For peri-operative antibacterial prophylaxis, urological interventions are categorized into open and endoscopic-instrumental operations and diagnostic procedures (Table 19). The recommended antibiotics are summarized in Appendix 3.

Table 19: Classification of urological operations/interventions with regard to peri-operative antibacterial prophylaxis

Open operations

- Urinary tract including bowel segments

- Urinary tract without bowel segments

- Special operations outside the urinary tract

• Using implants: penis and sphincter prosthesis; testicular prosthesis

• Reconstructive genital operations: acute operation; secondary operation

Endoscopic-instrumental operations

- Urethra

- Prostate

- Bladder

- Ureter and kidney

- Percutaneous litholapaxy

- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

- Laparascopic operations

Diagnostic interventions

• Prostate biopsy

8. Transrectal

9. Perineal

- Urethrocystoscopy

- Ureterorenoscopy

- Percutaneous pyeloscopy

- Laparoscopic procedures

9.8. 1 Urological operations including bowel segments

Intestinal organisms are usually responsible for the development of post-operative infections after operations that include intestinal segments. The organisms most frequently involved are E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae, enterococci, anaerobes and streptococci, as well as staphylococci in wound infections. An aminopenicillin/acylaminopenicillin plus a BLI, or a second-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole, is therefore recommended.

It is a matter of debate, but not proven in clinical studies, whether continent pouches or bladder replacements require prolonged post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis. Indwelling catheters and regular irrigation of the colonized intestinal segment (neobladder) could result in post-operative bacteraemia and, in exceptional circumstances, portal pyaemia.

9. 8.2 Urological operations without bowel segments

General antibiotic prophylaxis is not required in open operations without bowel segments. It is necessary only in patients with an increased risk of infection (Table 16), or before a TURP if there is a history of a UTI. The most frequent infecting organism is E. coli followed by enterococci, Proteus spp. and Klebsiella spp. in the urinary tract, and staphylococci for wound infections. The bacterial spectrum of hospital-related UTIs must also be taken into consideration (Table 17), especially if the patient has an indwelling catheter.

A peri-operative antibiotic regimen recommended for prophylaxis according to the expected range of pathogens includes an oral/parenteral fluoroquinolone, an aminopenicillin plus a BLI, or a second-generation cephalosporin. A third-generation cephalosporin, or an acylaminopenicillin plus a BLI are alternatives for patients with an increased risk of infection, who have previously been treated with an antibiotic or who have a permanent catheter or nephrostomy drainage.

9.8.3 Urological operations outside the urinary tract

Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis is not generally recommended except in long reconstructive operations on the genital area or with implant surgery. It can be achieved with first- or second-generation cephalosporins, since staphylococcal infection predominates.

9.8.4 Endo-urological operations

Peri-operative prophylaxis is recommended only in cases at increased risk of infection (Table 17). For patients undergoing TURP, additional risk factors for morbidity are to be considered, such as size of prostate (> 45 g),

operative time (> 90 min) and acute urinary retention (32). Appropriate antibiotic regimens include a fluoroquinolone, an aminopenicillin plus a BLI, a second-generation cephalospohn, or co-trimoxazole. Comparative studies of short-term prophylaxis using fluoroquinolones versus co-trimoxazole are not available. Alternatives are fosfomycin trometamol and aminoglycosides. If the patient can take oral medication, a regimen including a single dose of a fluoroquinolone or two doses of fosfomycin trometamol can be considered as first choice (33,34). For laparoscopic operations (e.g. varicocele, lymphadenectomy, nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy), sufficiently powered studies are missing. It seems reasonable, however, to manage them in the same manner as the corresponding open procedures.

9.8.5 Diagnostic urological interventions

Peri-operative antibacterial prophylaxis, e.g. with an oral fluoroquinolone (35), an aminoglycoside, a second-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole, or an aminopenicillin plus a BLI, is generally recommended only in transrectal prostate biopsy with a thick needle. In other diagnostic procedures of the urinary tract, prophylaxis is suggested in high-risk patients. An oral/parenteral fluoroquinolone or co-trimoxazole is appropriate.

9.8.6 Post-operative drainage of the urinary tract

When continuous urinary drainage (e.g. indwelling catheter, stent, nephrostomy, etc.), is left in place after an operation, the prolongation of peri-operative antibacterial prophylaxis is contra-indicated. If a symptomatic/febrile infection episode occurs, the patient has to be treated empirically until culture results are available. Asymptomatic bacteriuria has to be treated only prior to any urinary tract intervention or when the drainage tube is removed.

9.9 Pharmacoeconomics

The results of the largest study performed worldwide of the control of nosocomial infections have shown that UTIs (42%), followed by wound infections (24%), are the most frequent cause of infective post-operative complications (36). If these can be prevented, there is obviously great potential for cost-reduction in surgery. However, cost-benefit considerations of peri-operative antibacterial prophylaxis have not been fully addressed in urology. One exception is a meta-analysis of eight prospective, randomized, controlled trials in extra-corporeal Shockwave lithotripsy, where a 50% reduction in median risk of a UTI was indicated in patients treated with prophylaxis (2.1 % vs a median risk of 5.7%). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0005) and the strategy added minimally to the overall cost of extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy as it prevented serious UTIs requiring inpatient treatment (37). Similar studies for TURP and bladder tumours, for example, are missing. Nevertheless, an appreciation of cost-saving by peri-operative prophylaxis can only be evaluated by suitable studies.

A summary of the recommendations of peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis is given in Appendix 3 (10).

REFERENCES

Дата добавления: 2015-10-29