Читайте также:
|
|
1. If there’s going to be any agreement, it’s necessary for one of us to make a
concession.
2. The only way to reach a compromise is to swap/trade/make concessions.
3. To reach/get to an agreement, we had to use delivery time as a bargaining
chip.
4. Let’s try to think of ways to make our offer more attractive by sweetening the
deal.
5. We need to put a better offer on the table.
Links (click a link to open the exercise)
Online Activities – Flash Quizzes
(click above to open)
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 15
Successful Negotiations
Online Activities: M P 3 P o d cast:
BEP 402 – Negotiation Strategy (Part 2)
This is the second in a two-part series on negotiation
strategy. It is part of a longer sequence on
negotiation skills.
In the first episode, management consultant Bryan
Fields discussed the basics of making a deal. We
learned how to avoid some top common mistakes
and we reviewed important vocabulary, such as
BATNA, bottom line, bargaining chip, win-win, and
zone of possible agreement.
Today’s show continues the interview with Bryan. In
the dialog, we’ll learn five important elements of
strategy – parties, interests, value, power and
ethics. And along the way we’ll study useful
vocabulary and idioms.
Listening Questions
1) What is the interviewer talking about when he refers to a “trap?”
2) How does Bryan say we should think about interests?
3) In the interview, we learn that overcoming blockage – that is, getting past
problems – is not just about reaching the agreement but also about
maximizing what?
Vocabulary
“Not by a long shot:” “Not even close.” “We don’t think there is any money to be
made in this deal for us – not by a long shot.”
Party: A participant in a negotiation. “Identifying the real parties to a negotiation
is a key step in your preparation.”
Decision maker: The person in charge of making a final decision. “In Chinese
culture, it may not at all be obvious who the real decision maker is when you first
meet.
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 16
business english pod
Trap: Something that wastes time, energy, or money in a negotiation, or which
can even cause it to fail. In some cases, your opposite number may even
intentionally lay or set a trap for you. “They set a trap for us, and we fell right
into it.”
Interests: The motivations and aims that help define each part’s objectives. “To
achieve your own goals, it’s essential to consider the other parties’ interests.”
Opposite number: The person (usually of equal rank) who holds your job on the
other party. “My opposite number in the negotiation had years more experience
than I did.”
Where is/are he/she/they coming from? What is their motivation? What drives
them? What are their real interests? “We’re trying to understand where they are
coming from, but so far it’s difficult to determine.
Value: Includes not just monetary value (price) but also intangible, abstract
things like loyalty, brand image, synergies, etc. Collocates with to create, to
deliver, etc. “We have to find more ways to create value and deliver it to our
customers.”
Synergy (n) /synergetic (adj.) / to synergize (v): Synergy refers to a situation in
which the whole is greater than the sum of the parts (that is, situations in which
one plus one is greater than two). “We are looking for synergy effects in order to
maximize joint value.”
To think outside the box: To think creatively outside the normal habits of a
group or organization. “People who can think outside the box are often the best
at finding a compromise that all sides can agree to.”
To contribute to the image of sth.: In this case, image refers to the way that
something is seen – its’ reputation. “Stocking a famous brand can often
contribute greatly to a store’s image.”
Commercial transaction: A situation in which party A buys something from party
B and gives them money for it. “Simple commercial transactions are only one
type of negotiation.”
To set up/remove barriers/obstacles/impediments: Barriers, obstacles, and
impediments are all things that block the road. A barrier is total – the road
cannot be passed; whereas, obstacles and impediments only hinder progress.
“Traditional thinking can be an impediment to positive change.”
Joint value: Mutual benefit. “We have to think of ways to create joint value.”
To overcome blockage: To defeat or conquer barriers to a negotiation.
“Overcoming blockage requires a sincere desire on all sides to reach an
agreement.”
To make the deal: To reach agreement. “It took two weeks to make this deal.”
To maximize value: To create the most value possible. “Negotiation is not just
about reaching a simple agreement but about maximizing value.”
Corporate social responsibility: Values of moral responsibility to the environment
and to the public that companies use to create value by improving their image
and reputation. “In today’s business environment, corporate social responsibility
is an important factor in any global company’s success.”
Shareholder rights: Rights of stockholders in a company to information,
dividends (profit share) etc. “One of the most important shareholder rights it
that to information about a company’s profit and loss.”
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 17
Successful Negotiations
Dialog
Interviewer: Okay, and are those the main things to planning strategy?
Bryan: Not by a long shot. There are several other things to consider. For
instance, we should constantly be asking ourselves, who are the real parties in
the negotiation… who are the decision makers. Sometimes the person sitting
across the table from you is not the person in charge, or isn’t who they seem to
be.
Interviewer: Right, I can see how that could be a trap.
Bryan: Absolutely. And another thing is to think creatively about interests.
That means, what are their fundamental needs and priorities? A lot of people
make the mistake of not considering carefully where their opposite number is
coming from, and what goals he has to accomplish.
Interviewer: That has to do with benefits?
Bryan: Certainly, and it leads into a discussion of value. We are looking for
synergy effects, i.e., ways to make 1 + 1 equal more than 2. The questions
are, How can value be created? and, Who is likely to get it?. We need to think
outside the box.
Interviewer: Can you give me an example?
Bryan: Well…. For instance, you may be interested in buying my product
because it contributes to the image of your store. Or you may want to
acquire my business because it will help you control a key part of the market.
There is much more to all this than a simple commercial transaction.
Interviewer: Okay, so far we’ve only talked about positive things. What are the
negatives that come up in a negotiation?
Bryan: There’re certainly negatives as well. We often call these barriers. It’s
important to think of these not just in terms of obstacles that might prevent
agreement, but, much more subtly, as impediments to maximizing joint value.
Interviewer: So overcoming blockage is not just about making the deal,
it’s about maximizing value as well.
Bryan: That’s right. And to do that, you have to watch out for the ways that
various parties influence the negotiation process and its outcome. This kind
of power to remove or set up barriers to agreement can be both a
blessing and a curse.
Interviewer: It seems to me that there’s one last thing that hasn’t come into
the discussion so far, and that’s: Morally, what is the right thing to do?
Bryan: If you had asked me that question 15 years ago, I might have laughed.
But these days we think of ethics in broader terms to include the
environment … corporate social responsibility … shareholder rights … and
all these areas have a lot of potential value for companies.
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 18
business english pod
Debrief
As the dialog opens, the interviewer – referring to the first half of the discussion
in the previous episode – asks Bryan if that was all there was to negotiation
strategy. Bryan replies, “Not by a long shot,” which means, “not at all.” Then he
goes on to mention another key strategic concern:
Bryan: …For instance, we should constantly be asking ourselves, who are the
real parties in the negotiation… who are the decision makers.
A party to a negotiation is a person, group, or company that has an interest in
the discussion. For example, in a typical sales negotiation there are at least two
parties – the buyer and the seller. Bryan emphasizes how important it is to
determine who the real parties are – who are the decision makers, that is, the
people who have the final authority to make a decision, be it yes or no, buy or
sell. He says, “sometimes the person sitting across the table from you is not the
person in charge.” The interviewer refers to this as a trap, which in this case
means a situation that leads us to waste time and energy or, in the worst case,
causes us fail.
So determining the real parties – the decision makers – is the first strategy that
Bryan mentions. Let’s listen to some more example sentences discussing this
element of strategy:
It’s not always obvious at first glance who the decision makers are.
Often, there are more than just two parties to a negotiation – deals may be
complex, and we must also consider government or shareholder involvement.
It’s important to recognize the real parties to the negotiation and identify the
key decision makers.
After interests, what is the next strategy Bryan talks about?
Bryan: … And another thing is to think creatively about interests. That means,
what are their fundamental needs and priorities? A lot of people make the
mistake of not considering carefully where their opposite number is coming
from, and what goals he has to accomplish.
Here Bryan emphasizes the importance of thinking creatively or originally about
the actual interests or goals of the parties to a negotiation. We must consider
where they are coming from – that is, what their opinions and viewpoints are,
what motivates and drives them, etc. The idiom – where someone is coming
from – is a useful oral English expression for discussing interests. Listen to some
more examples of its use:
I don’t think I really understand where he’s coming from on this issue.
We asked them about their motives for the merger to get a feeling for where
they were coming from.
It’s not at all clear to me where she is coming from.
As the interviewer points out in the dialog, thinking about interests means
considering the other parties benefits. How does Bryan react to this observation?
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 19
Successful Negotiations
Bryan: Certainly, and it leads into a discussion of value. We are looking for
synergy effects, i.e., ways to make 1 + 1 equal more than 2.
Value is a key consideration in any business deal. It is a broad, abstract term
that does not refer merely to money but more generally to benefit and gain of all
types. We often speak of creating value and delivering value to customers.
Creating value involves looking for synergy, which, as Bryan points out, means
situations in which the whole is greater than the sum of the parts – or, as he
says, in which one plus one is equal to more than 2.
This term – synergy – has become a very popular and important word in
business language.
After many mergers, the promised synergies fail to materialize, often
because of cultural and management differences.
A lot of what we are doing in negotiation is looking for synergies between our
companies.
Identifying synergy effects requires creative thinking.
Next, Bryan goes on to talk about how to create synergy effects…
Bryan: The question is, How can value be created? and, Who is likely to get it?
We need to think outside the box.
To think outside the box is another popular, useful business idiom. It means to
think outside the normal habits of a group or organization – in other words, to
think creatively.
I particularly admire his ability to think outside the box – he’s very original.
In many tough negotiations, it can really help if there is someone on both
sides who can think outside the box.
Often, finding and creating value requires thinking outside the box.
Bryan gives two examples of thinking outside the box: 1) Carrying a product in a
store not just to sell it but because it contributes to the image of our business;
and 2) Buying a business not to directly add to our profit but to control a part of
the market. As he underlines, there is much more to all of this than a simple
commercial transaction, i.e., more than mere buying and selling.
Next, the discussion turns from positives to negatives – things that can cause a
negotiation to falter or fail:
Bryan: There’re certainly negatives as well. We often call these barriers. It’s
important to think of these not just in terms of obstacles that might prevent
agreement, but, much more subtly, impediments to maximizing joint value.
Bryan calls these negative barriers. Words he uses with the same or similar
meanings include obstacles and impediments. All of these words collocate with
the verbs set up (to create) and remove (to get rid of), and they use the
preposition to: For example, Bryan says it’s important to remove obstacles to
maximizing joint value. That means, to get rid of things that prevent all sides
from getting more benefit. Together, all these negatives – obstacles,
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 20
business english pod
impediments, and so on – are referred to as blockage, which must be overcome
or removed. Let’s listen to more examples that demonstrate this important
vocabulary:
It was a real challenge to remove the barriers that had been set up, but in
the end we succeeded.
Overcoming blockage is a process of getting rid of obstacles in the road to an
agreement.
A typical impediment to compromise is an overemphasis on price.
The discussion of blockage leads into the next important strategic consideration
– power. As Bryan thinks of it, this means the ability to set up or remove
barriers, which – depending on what side you are on – can be a blessing or a
curse. This last phrase forms a common idiom. It refers to something that can
be bad or good, depending on the situation. (We also say something is both a
blessing and a curse.)
Listen to some more examples of this expression:
Fierce competition can be both a blessing and a curse.
Time constraints can be a blessing and a curse – both speeding things along
and causing people to give up without reaching agreement.
Having a clear bottom line can be both a blessing and a curse – it’s often
better to be fairly flexible in your approach.
What is the last point that the interviewer raises in the discussion, before the
interview draws to a close? It’s ethics, or morality. The interviewer poses the
question, “Do we need to think morally, what is the right thing to do?” How does
Bryan respond?
Bryan: If you had asked me that question 15 years ago, I might have laughed.
But these days we think of ethics in broader terms to include the
environment … corporate social responsibility … shareholder rights … and
all these areas have a lot of potential value for companies.
Bryan’s opinion is that ethics have become more and more important to
business. Examples he gives are the environment, corporate social responsibility
(often referred to as CSR) and shareholder rights (which mainly refers to the
right of company stockholders to information, but also to the right to dividends
or profit share and the right to cast votes). As Bryan points out, all these moral
issues are areas of great potential value to companies.
Let’s explore all these expressions with example phrases.
Corporate social responsibility is an area of great potential value to
companies these days, since it can help companies build brand image and
loyalty.
More and more companies are recognizing the potential value of
environmental protection.
There is good evidence that expanding and protecting shareholder rights
actually can have a positive effect on stock price.
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 21
Successful Negotiations
Now, it’s your turn to practice. First, we’ll review some of the verb collocations
that we just learned: In a moment, you’ll hear a series of sentences with a verb
blanked out or replaced with a beep. Repeat the whole sentence, supplying the
missing verb in the correct form.
For example, if you hear:
It is important to <beep> obstacles to reaching an agreement.
You will say:
It is important to remove obstacles to reaching an agreement.
Let’s give it a try.
Cue 1: To reach an agreement it’s necessary to <beep> blockage.
Learner 1:
Cue 2: Ideally, negotiation is a process of <beep> joint value.
Learner 2:
Cue 3: We have to try to <beep> outside the box on this.
Learner 3:
Cue 4: Let’s try to think of ways to <beep> morevalue to customers.
Learner 4:
Answer 1: To reach an agreement it’s necessary to overcome blockage.
Answer 2: Ideally, negotiation is a process of maximizing joint value.
Answer 3: We have to try to think outside the box on this.
Answer 4: Let’s try to think of ways to deliver morevalue to customers.
Next we’ll use the same method to review key vocabulary. You’ll hear another
series of cues. As before, one word is blanked out with a beep. Repeat each
sentence, supplying the missing word.
Cue 1: After many mergers, the promised <beep> fail to materialize.
Learner 1:
Cue 2: It’s not at all clear to me where she is <beep> from.
Learner 2:
Cue 3: Fierce competition can be both a <beep> and a curse.
Learner 3:
Cue 4: More and more companies are recognizing the great <beep> value in
environmental protection.
Learner 4:
Cue 5: Corporate <beep> responsibility is an area of great concern to many
companies these days.
Learner 5:
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 22
business english pod
Answer 1: After many mergers, the promised synergies fail to materialize.
Answer 2: It’s not at all clear to me where she is coming from.
Answer 3: Fierce competition can be both a blessing and a curse.
Answer 4: More and more companies are recognizing the great potential value
in environmental protection.
Answer 5: Corporate social responsibility is an area of great concern to many
companies these days.
That concludes this two-part series on negotiation strategy. We have looked at
common mistakes and reviewed important elements of strategy, including
BATNA, interests, values, barriers, power and ethics. We’ve also covered significant verb collocations as well as a range of useful idioms and expressions,
such as bargaining chips, deal sweeteners, synergy, and thinking outside the
box.
In future episodes, we’ll take a closer look at negotiation language and skills.
Thanks for listening!
© 2009 All rights reserved: www.business english pod.com 23
Successful Negotiations
Language Review
Дата добавления: 2015-10-28; просмотров: 224 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Online Activities | | | A. Useful Language |