Читайте также: |
|
By conducting a review of the literature, researchers refine the problem under study, clarify possible techniques to be used in collecting data, and may avoid making unnecessary mistakes. When David Snow and his colleagues began considering mental illness among the homeless, they turned to two types of literature. First, they reviewed "popular" magazines such as Time, News-week, and People and found a consistent image of
CHAPTER TWO ♦ METHODS OF
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
the homeless as "street people" who had previously spent time in mental hospitals. Second, they examined systematic studies done in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia which indicated that homeless persons coming to emergency shelters and psychiatric hospitals were usually found to have a diagnosable mental illness.
But were these studies representative of the homeless? Still further review showed that when researchers focused on the homeless in general— rather than solely on those treated by psychiatri-cally based agencies under emergency conditions—the proportions of homeless persons found to be mentally ill were much lower (Ohio Department of Mental Health, 1984; Roth et al., 1985; Snow et al., 1986:407-408). These conflicting findings called into question the common media image of the homeless as predominantly mentally ill. The researchers' review of the literature underscored the importance of thoroughly examining previous studies that use different techniques before proceeding with one's own research.
Дата добавления: 2015-08-27; просмотров: 51 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Defining the Problem | | | Formulating the Hypothesis |