Читайте также:
|
Whether can be the nuclear power plant a basis of power of the country
In the entire civilized world have understood, that not quantity of the power, per person, defines the welfare, but what this power gives to the person.
Than the country is more rich and the better people live in it), then more reasonably and more economically they use energy storage.
When atomic lobbyists repeat, that there is no alternative to atomic energy, at once there is a question – why do they demand any alternative to something without what the Humankind lived in past and without what the majority of the population of the Earth already successfully lives today?
The backlog of energy saving is big enough in our Republic. On assessments of many experts, it compounds up to 40 percents from total amount of used power (this almost half of all power senselessly takes off for a pipe!).
Disturbing (very much demonstrative and demagogical!) that all gas arrives to us from Russia looks, to put it mildly, unconvincing. If to speak, who risks from it first - it is Russia as the large part of gas export goes through our territory. Moreover, while it so, our country will have gas.
It is not necessary to discount stores of combustible slates available in our country, peat and coal. At their reasonable utilization, the significant part of those energy demands which today are covered with imported power supplies can be compensated.
Similar, not “power safety” of Belarus and not welfare of its people disturb these personalities. They want to solve personal problems!
Thus, talks about necessity of “strengthening of energy of Belarus by NPPs” appear in fact false and are directed on everything, but not for the good for our country and its people.
9.2. What is «power safety «
The concept of “power safety” supposes conditioning at which country appears independent from countries - suppliers of power resources.
Reasonable question: whether construction of the nuclear power plant releases Belarus from power or fuel dependence on countries of suppliers?
The customer appears in the uttermost dependence on country or firm of the supplier. Practically everything, that is connected to construction and exploitation of a reactor, and decommission, entirely depends on the firm - supplier.
The country decided on construction by the own nuclear power plant based on another’s reactor, from the very beginning of works becomes the hostage of the firm - supplier of the reactor equipment on all questions.
Only reconnoitred on today stores of gas in Russia is enough on 60-80 years that exceeds not only times of construction and exploitation of the nuclear power plant taken together, but also resource times of exhaustion available at the price of stores of nuclear fuel.
The serious substantiations presented by the Committee on sustainable energy of the European Economic Commission of the United Nations on October 1998, session [52], reconfirm the conclusion that in the nearest future for Humankind the most perspective and safety kind of fuel is a natural gas.
Tendency to impose to Belarus the program of creation of atomic energy does not decide a problem of so-called “power safety” of the country, but also is capable to drive it in dead spot of irresistible economic, ecological and demographic problems.
Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 28 | Нарушение авторских прав
| <== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
| State-of-the-art of construction of the nuclear power plant in the world. | | | The attitude of the population of Belarus to construction of the nuclear power plant. |