Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Whether we know all about possibilities of power?

Not catastrophe, not accident, and simply a fire? | Whether have grown wiser IAEA and WHO for three years? (To the Report of the United Nations “20 years after”). | Conclusion: the statistics should be competent and honest, otherwise it become the weapon of great lie. | Touching care” of people | Security of the NPP by nuclear fuel | Not development, but reducing of programs. | The quantity of reactors, which construction is suspended or annulled in 1971-1998. ([42], tab. 19). | How various states concern to NPP. | Whether can be the nuclear power plant a basis of power of the country? | Reasonable question: whether construction of the nuclear power plant releases Belarus from power or fuel dependence on countries of suppliers? |


Читайте также:
  1. A FEW WORDS ABOUT OPERATING A BUSINESS
  2. A Note About England in the Nineteenth Century
  3. A tumor that is 2 centimeters is about the size of a peanut, and a tumor that is 5 centimeters is about the size of a lime.
  4. A) Read the following comments from three people about their families.
  5. A) Read the text below to find out about using gestures in different cultures.
  6. A) Read, translate and dramatise the interview about admission into the U.S.
  7. A) Summarize the information about the experiment in the table below.

 

One of affirmation of atomic lobbyists is: “There is no alternative to atomic energy”. That is: there is nothing to substitute atomic energy. However, in fact we never thought about atomic energy in not so remote past. And stayed alive. It is quite possible, that, if military desires to get an atomic and hydrogen charge, did not appear, the “peace” and atomic energy could not appear at all. Moreover, life would not stopped because of it. To tell the truth, today we would not test problems called by appearance of atomic weapons and “peace” atomic reactors. However, is it bad? There are no doubts that Humankind could survive without all this “atomic nasty things”. We are convinced that to speak about alternative to atomic energy today is indecently. Where it is more logical to ask atomic lobbyists: why suddenly they have decided to consider atomic energy as alternative to normal development of Humankind? So, the question – “What could be alternative to atomic energy?” is not lawful. That is senseless to wait for the answer to this question.

However, on importunate tendency of atomic lobbyists to convince people that Humankind in any way could not exist without them, it is completely not difficultly to give the convincing and comprehensive answer.

How to survive without atomic energy? In the answer to this question, there are new, more concrete questions. First, whether so much power is necessary to us, how many we consume today? In addition, the second question: whether we reasonably use all energy resources of the planet, whether we already know about all resources? The answer to the first question can be completely categorical: no, it is not necessary for us so much power as its significant part we till now manage in the literal sense to throw out on a wind. This part of our costs also should be reduced, directing on it the experience, the skill and the tendencies. It is the most noble and reasonable part of our today’s actions. Much, that we do today, reminds the plot of Mendeleev when fire bank notes to heat. The economies of power resources are very serious problem, and we will have special talk about it.

Many books are already written about those energy resources, which are used and not used. However, very much in them is not told still. Having gone deep into this most interesting problem, it is possible to forget about the purpose of the given book absolutely. It will not be possible to bypass this question. Suddenly you will think that we do not know the answer to it. However, we will tell about that further.

 


Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 41 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
The attitude of the population of Belarus to construction of NPP.| Economy – the cheapest way of maintenance of energy needs.

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.007 сек.)