How various states concern to NPP.

Comprehension of substantial economic disadvantage and ecological hazard of atomic energy comes in the increasing number of countries of the world. It has immediately touched and those states, which created the nuclear power plants and fought for development of nuclear industry. The substantial facts even more often conflict to euphoria of the advertised possibilities of atomic energy

Governments of many states, mainly of under pressure of the population, have started to change their attitude to construction of the nuclear power plant. Therefore, in 1980 during referendum the majority of the population of Sweden supported refusal from use of the nuclear power plants to the year 2010. Such solution was taken over also by the Parliament of the country. On opinion of Government closure of the nuclear power plants begin since 1998[48] from decommission of one of twelve operating reactors

The moratorium on construction of the nuclear power plant works in Spain where the last nuclear power plant has been constructed in 1988. In 1995 in this country has been accepted the special law, which ban to complete construction of five reactors [6].

Rather original situation has developed in Austria. In the capital of this country is located the IAEA headquarter - the main propagandist of construction of the nuclear power plants all over the world. Thus, Austria has no nuclear power plants and is the first country with official anti-nuclear policy. The federal act about ban of use of an atomic energy in Austria has been accepted on 15.12.1978.

In 1993, the Finnish Parliament has forbidden the further construction of the nuclear power plant [6].

The power policy of Germany referring group of the states, which produces a lot of “nuclear electric power” (the part in own production is more than 30 %). Above we already spoke about the special approach of Germany to the problem of atomic energy. We shall tell little bit more in detail.

In Governmental declaration of the Federal chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schroeder [50] in October 1998 was reconfirmed, that Germany terminates activities on development of atomic energy and starts decommissioning of nuclear power plants. We shall cite some typical quotes from this application:

“utilization of nuclear energy is unacceptable for the society. It is unreasonable also from the economic point of view. We shall control the phasing-out of utilization of nuclear energy.“

“The part of nuclear energy will gradually reduce and, at last, it will be substituted by other energy sources.“

“Thus we stake first of all on a potential of innovations and development of renewable energy sources. We also stake on serial utilization of possibilities of energy saving: in a process of production of the electric power, during its consumption by electro-devices, in buildings, on the transport.“

“However the problem of recycling of radioactive waste remain to us and our descendants on millennia. The former concept of recycling has appeared untenable. Instead of it, we shall develop the national plan of recycling. Recycling will be circumscribed to immediate final repository of radioactive wastes.“

Alas, the problem of the radioactive waste is not the most important and difficult problem of all atomic energy. In addition, it is accepted by the Chief of Germany. And in his declaration it is emphasized, that this problem «remains to us and our descendants on millennia“.

The examined situation, which reflects German attitude, it is impossible to name differently as extremely reasonable. Through all declaration of Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder the idea of protection of people of Germany from nuclear trouble, passes. Alas, to atomic lobbyists and to many simple citizens of our country very much do not fail so reasonable assessments and so frank care of people, and their Future.

As we see, the increasing number of countries of the world terminates development of atomic energy and is yielded to idea of the moratorium on carrying out of these works in the countries.

The original position in connection with atomic energy has developed in Switzerland. In 1990 in this country has been accepted the 10-years moratorium against construction of the nuclear power plant [6]. In 1997 year, the solution was accepted to refuse from utilization of atomic energy to 2030. We already spoke that for Switzerland – country of health resorts, including the famous and most popular mounting skiing resorts in the world, the alpine tourist and sports - climbing bases, such solutions look quite natural. For countries with resort-tourist trend of the basic revenues of the budget pollution free territory is a determinative factor attracting visitors. Swiss people very diligently support the image of the cleanest resort territories. It would seem, the Chernobyl accident, which has occurred on distance almost in two thousand kilometres from Switzerland, could not deliver any nuisances. However, alas, Chernobyl has reached and these fertile places. In accordance to the “Atlas of contamination of Europe by caesium after Chernobyl accident”, [67] torrents of radioactive emissions from the blown up reactor have not bypassed this country also. Some places in the south of Switzerland have appeared contaminated. Chernobyl “has presented” with it one of resort areas of Switzerland. That is the price of accident on the atomic reactor very far from this country!

And what in the Switzerland? It is necessary to repeat. For today in country five reactors [65] work. For such small country (the area 41.288 square kilometres) it is a lot. The density of population in this country in 3,5 times higher, than in Belarus. Similar, those citizens of Switzerland have something to think about. However, they did not. On the past referendum, citizens of country have refused from earlier accepted and undoubtedly reasonable solutions and have agreed with the further development of atomic energy in their country. It is necessary to express only regret to Swiss. However, fortunately, except for Switzerland no other country, wished to stop atomic energy, has not refused.

Very important conclusion follows from the given example: under circumstances it is impossible to trust those myths, which are imposed persistently to us by supporters of atomic energy. Furthermore, as a rule, these figures do not trouble themselves with evidences of affirmations. Having the broadest possibilities for “duping” us, they literally “zombie” students, readers and spectators with the categorical affirmations and pharisaic swearing. Unfortunately, it is not enough of literature and other truthful information in this sphere, that practically it would be more correct to tell, that it simply absent. We attempt to introduce to tell you the truth about the atomic energy, founded only on the concrete facts, in this book.

Rather interesting attitude to atomic energy was stated by workers of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant [62]. These statements are from the letter of people whom are interested in development of atomic energy. We bring them to your attention:

Human victims, breaking of standard conditions of residence of millions people and the whole generations, loss of huge territories cannot be justified by any requirements for the electric power and “state” interests …”.

With it in any way, it is impossible to argue!

Whether we have the right by our today’s operations to create hardest problems to our descendants? In fact, our descendant will live in this contaminated world, struggle with these problems and overcome. In addition, our responsibility before the Future consists in it! Those who do not perceive or do not want to perceive, commit the greatest Crime before Humankind!

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14