PROF. Alfred Meyers

Architect | Designer

HAN University of Applied Sciences

Arnhem, the Netherland s

East-Carolina University

Adjunct professor

Department of Construction Management

Greenville, North Carolina, US

File: 00-kazNTU ASSESSMENT FOREIGN SCHOLAR PROGR

NAME:

GENDER: FEMALE / MALE

BACHELOR: 4^TH / 5^TH YEAR

ENGLISH WRITING & SPOKEN ASSESSMENT

“QUESTIONNAIRE ON ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN ATTITUDE AND PROFESSION”

Never answer with yes or no. Arguments are what clients want to read.

1. Who you are and what is your background and your expectations?

2. What are your strengths and competencies still to be strengthened next period?

3. What do you like most and what not in designing; what are your problems?

4. Are you experienced in detailing of building parts?

5. DITTO OF STRUCTURAL BEARING SYSTEMS?

• Can you develop bearing structureS your PROJECTS?

6. What do you understand under the notion ‘architecture’?

7. What are your two most successful study projects? bring them with you for the assessment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

“WHAT KIND OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES DO YOU WANT TO DEVELOP IN THIS PROGRAMME?”

General

1. Professional competences

• PROJECT DESIGN MANAGEMENT

• REPORTING

• CLIENT PRESENTATION

• TEAM WORK, COMMUNICATION

2. Personal competences

• PROFESSIONAL Attitude

• PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE

• SKETCHING

• WHAT ELSE?

Profession, specific

1. EVER THOUGHT ABOUT DIFFERENT Design METHODOLOGIES?

2. PROBLEMS WITH ANALYSING AND ARGUING OF PROBLEMS?

3. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS OF COMPLEX BUILDINGS?

4. DO YOU KNOW HOW TO ORGANISE BUILDING SITES FOR YOUR PROJECTS?

5. OTHER …

QUALITY OF PREVIOUS PROJECTS

“DESIGN PROCESS AND CONTENT”

1. Describe the strong DESIGN ELEMENTS of two of your best projects and explain the ‘why’

• Attach one floor plan and one facade drawing

• WHAT ARE THE DESIGN ELEMENTS IN ONE OF YOUR FORMER PROJECTS, WHICH YOU WOULD CHANGE NOW AFTER SEEING THE PROJECT BACK?

2. During designing these projects, did you ever consider how to integrate structural bearing systemS and building equipment requirements?

• What problems could you not solve?

• If not, explain why

• Do you want to learn more about these issues?

3. Name two architects and two projects of them that you like most en explain the why’s or the ‘why not’.

STUDY PROCESS ATTITUDE AND PARTICIPATION

“WHAT COULD BE YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE PROGRAMME AND TO OTHER STUDENTS?”

If you participate this programme, you will learn that the profession could give you much pleasure if you are open for open discussionS, for open constructive critics. We will not discuss much projects of famous architects; objective of the programme is that you develop your own handwriting and opinion on Architecture. It does not matter what you think, important is that you can clarify your objectives and meanings.

Feel free to pose suggestions.

Your participation and contribution to this programme is part of the final quality of tour own learning process. You have now the opportunity to ‘colour’ your study yourself. We intend not to tell you what is good for you, because you will learn better from own criticism by trying to ‘cross your own borders’ and by trying to ‘jump-out-of-the-box’ and being not afraid of risking some critical discussion.

1. My CONTRIBUTION MIGHT BE …

2. DO YOU LIKE TO PRESENT TWO OF YOUR FAVOURITE PROJECTS OF FAMOUS OR LESS-FAMOUS ARCHITECTS?

• WHO ARE THEY AND WHICH PROJECTS?

• What arguments do you have to choose just these projects?

Дата добавления: 2015-10-29