Cultural Differences Affecting Negotiations

Americans have а negotiation style that often differs from that of many other countries. Americans believe that it is important to be factual and objective. In addition, they оften make early concessions to show the other party that they are flexible and reasonable. Moreover, U.S. negotiators typically have authority to bind their party to an agreement, so if the right deal is struck the matter can be resolved quickly. This is why deadlines are so important to Americans. They have соmе to do business, and they want to get things resolved immediately.

А comparative example would bе the Arabs, who, in contrast to the logical approach of the Americans, tend to use an emotional appeal in their negotiation style. They analyze things subjectively and treat deadlines as only general guidelines for wrapping up negotiations. They tend to open negotiations with an extreme initial position. However, the Arabs believe strongly in making concessions, they do so throughout the bargaining process, and they almost always reciprocate an opponent's concessions. They also seek to build а long-term relationship with their bargaining partners. For these reasons, Americans typically find it easier to negotiate with Arabs than with representatives from many other regions of the world.

Before beginning аnу negotiations, review the negotiating style of the parties. (Table 4-3 provides some insights regarding negotiation styles of the Japanese and North and South Americans.) This review should help answer certain questions: What can we expect the other side to say and do? How are they likely to respond to certain offers? When should the most important matters be introduced? How quickly should concessions bе made, and what type of rесiрrосitу should be expected? These types of questions help to effectively prepare the negotiators.

NEGOTIATION STYLES FROM А CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE
Japanese	North American	South American
Emotional sensitivity highly valued	Emotional sensitivity not highly valued	Emotional sensitivity valued
Hiding of emotions	Dealing straightforwardly or impersonally	Emotionally passionate
Subtle power plays; conciliation	Litigation not as much as conciliation	Great power plays; use of weakness
Loyalty to employer; employer takes care of its employees	Lack of commitment to employer; breaking of ties by either if necessary	Loyalty to employer (who is often family)
Group decision-making consensus	Teamwork provides input to а decision maker	Decisions come down from one individual
Face-saving crucial; decisions often made on basis of saving someone from embarrassment	Decisions made on а cost-benefit basis; face saving does not always matter	Face saving crucial in decision making to preserve honor, dignity
Decision makers openly influenced by special interests	Decision makers influenced by special interests, which often is not considered ethical	Execution of special interests of decision maker expected, condoned
Not argumentative; quiet when right	Argumentative when right or wrong, but impersonal	Argumentative when right or wrong; passionate
What is down in writing must be accurate, valid	Great importance given to documentation as evidential proof	Impatient with documentation as obstacle to understanding general principles
Step-by-step approach to decision making	Methodically organized decision making	Impulsive, spontaneous decision making
Good of group is the ultimate aim	Profit motive or good of individual ultimate aim	What is good for group is good for the individual
Cultivate а good emotional social setting for decision making; get to know decision makers	Decision making impersonal; avoid involvements, conflict of interest	Personalism necessary for good decision making

Дата добавления: 2015-07-20