Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Engineering calculations on local illumination of the operator PC

Читайте также:
  1. A job in Engineering
  2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)
  3. Addition operator
  4. AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING IN THE USA AND BRITAIN
  5. AS RADIO OPERATOR
  6. Branches of Engineering
  7. Building and engineering

 

Local illumination of workplace comes down to choosing the lighting system, the definition of the required number of fixtures, their type and placement. On this basis, we calculate the parameters of the artificial lighting.

Usually performed by artificial lighting electric light sources of two types: incandescent and fluorescent lamps. Will use fluorescent lamps, which in comparison with incandescent have a number of significant advantages:

- spectral composition of light, they are close to daylight, natural light;

- have higher efficiency (1.5-2 times higher than the efficiency of incandescent lamps);

- have high luminous efficiency (3-4 times higher than incandescent lamps);

- longer service life.

Lighting calculation is performed for a room area of ​​13.6 m2, a width of 4.2 m, length 3.23 m, height - 3,2 m use the method of flux.

To determine the number of fixtures define the luminous flux incident on a surface by the formula:

 

(10)

where F - calculated luminous flux lm;

Е - normalized minimum illumination, Lux (determined by the table). Programmer's job, according to this table can be classified as precision work, therefore, the minimum illumination would be Е = 300 lx;

S - area of illuminated space (in our case S = 13,6м2);

Z - the ratio of average illumination to minimum (usually assumed to be equal 1,1…1,2, let Z= 1,1);

К - factor of safety, taking into account the loss of luminous flux lamp fixtures due to contamination during operation (its value depends on the type of premises and the nature of work carried out in it, and in our case К = 1,5);

n - the utilization rate (expressed as the ratio of the luminous flux incident on the estimated surface to the total flux of the lamps and shall be calculated in fractions of a unit, dependent on the characteristics of the light, the room size, painting the walls and ceiling, characterized by reflection coefficients from the walls (РС) and ceiling (РП)), value of the coefficients РС и РП were indicated above: РС=40%, РП=60%. Value n define the table of coefficients using different fixtures. To do this, calculate the index space by the formula (Building codes and regulations 23-5-95):

 

(11)

 

Where

S - size of premises, S = 13,6 m2

h - estimated overall depth, given a suspended ceiling h = 3 m; A - width of the room, А = 3,23 m;

В - length of the room, В = 4,2 m.

Substituting the values ​​we obtain:


Knowing the index premises I, in Table 1 Building codes and regulations we find n = 0,25

Substitute all the values ​​in the formula for determining the luminous flux F:

 

Lm.

 

To choose the lighting fluorescent lamp type LB40-1, luminous flux which F = 4320 Lm.

Calculate the number of lamps required by the formula:

(12)

 

where N - defined number of lamps;

F - luminous flux, F = 26928 lm;

Fl - luminous flux, Fl = 4320 lm.

 

Thus, when choosing lighting fixtures, each fixture can have three lamps.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

 

REFERENCES

1. Nagel K., Schreckenberg M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic

// J. Physique I France. 1992. 2, pp. 2221–2229.

2. Астафьев Г. Б., Корновский А. А., Храмов А. Е. Клеточные автоматы.

http://cas.ssu.runnet.ru/sgnp/data/papers/Train/CellAutomat.pdf

3. University of Exeter. Traffic Jam Mystery Solved By Mathematicians.

ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071219103102.htm

4. Телехов М. Штопор для пробок //Российская газета. 07. 12. 2006.

http://www.transport.ru/1/12/i31_4004p0.htm

5. Машинописный маршрут /Приложение к газете «Коммерсантъ». № 166

(3742) от 13.09.2007. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=801719

6. Wang D. Official Google Blog: «Stuck in traffic?». 28.02.2007.

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/stuck-in-traffic.html

7. Блинкин М. Этиология и патогенез московских пробок /ПОЛИТ.РУ,

24.01.2008. http://polit.ru/lectures/2008/01/24/probki.html

8. Bellomo N., Coscia V., Delitala M. On the Mathematical Theory of Vehicular Traffic Flow. I. Fluid Dynamic and Kinetic Modelling //Math. Mod. Meth. App. Sc. Vol. 12. 2002. № 12, pp.1801–1843.

9. Ball P. Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. 2005.

10. Schreckenberg M., Schadschneider A., Nagel K., Ito N. Discrete stochastic models for traffic flow //Physical Review E (Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and

Related Interdisciplinary Topics). Vol. 51. 1995. № 4, pp.2939–2949.

11. Hybrid microscopic-mesoscopic traffic simulation. Burghout. Wilco 2004.

Doctoral thesis. http://www.diva-portal.org/diva/getDocument?urn_nbn_se_kth_diva-72-1__fulltext.pdf

12. Hull B., Bychkovsky V., Chen K. et al. CarTel: A Distributed Mobile Sensor Computing System /Proc. ACM SenSys. 2006. http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/papers/cartel-sensys06.pdf

13. Parkinson B. W. Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. Chap. 1: Introduction and Heritage of NAVSTAR, the Global Positioning System. 1996. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, D.C., pp. 3–28.

14. Navstar GPS and GLONASS: global satellite navigation systems. Daly, Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal. 1993. № 6, pp. 349 – 357.

15. Ogg E. Nokia turns people into traffic sensors //CNEWS. 8.02. 2008.

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9868169-7.html

16. Шебшаевич В. С., Дмитриев П. П., Иванцев Н. В. и др. Сетевые спутниковые радионавигационные системы. М.: Радио и связь, 1993.

17. Watanabe H. Optimal Velocity Model. http://www.phys.cs.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~watanabe/sample/ov_e.html

18. Bando M. et al. //Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 1994. № 11.

19. Okumura A., Tadaki S. Asymmetric Optimal Velocity Model // Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. Vol. 72. 2003. №. 11, pp. 2754-2758.

20. Wiedemann R. Modelling of RTI-Elements on multi-lane roads. Advanced

Telematics in Road Transport edited by the Comission of the European Community. DG XIII. Brussels. 1991.

21. СЭТ к эксплуатации ПК, видеотерминалов и условиям работы с ними // приказ МЗ РК, 2010. №.767.

22. О промышленной безопасности на опасных производственных объектах // приказ МЧС РК,2011. №.380.

23. О безопасности и охране труда // Ведомости Парламента РК, 2004. № 3, pp. 17.

24.

 

 


Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 98 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Characteristics of the workplace| СТРАДАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЗАЛОГ (Passive Voice)

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.01 сек.)