An innovative list of 'C step ideas - informed by both your vision and the sustainability challenges identified in the 'B' step.

4) A demonstrated application of the three prioritization questions in the D' step. For this point, you must articulate your rationale for prioritizing an action in the D' step. It is not enough to just list the action, or to answer 'yes' to each prioritization question. You must explain your thinking.

For example, consider this answer for the prioritized action of "partnering with a recycler to implement a recycling program for electronics":

"We feel that instituting a recycling program for electronics fits our criteria for a prioritized move based on our answers below to the three prioritizing questions.

1)It reduces, and possibly eliminates, our contribution to a systematically increasing concentration of trace metals in the biosphere because trace metals will be kept in technical loops to be reused as raw materials.

2)By partnering with a recycler we do not have to make heavy financial investments, nor are we committing to only one type of technology for recycling in the long-run. In other words, this investment provides us flexibility because we can change recyclers in the future, or use alternative technologies in future moves towards sustainability.

3) We can develop a financial arrangement with the recycler where they pick-up and recycle our electronics for free, because they will "mine" the trace metals and sell those as raw materials. We will need a small internal promotions campaign to ensure that recycling happens within our organization, however, we feel that this is a small investment when considering how we may avoid tougher legislation regarding disposal of electronics in the future."

Please remember that the prioritizing questions are used as a guide to help prioritize actions, not to justify all your brainstormed actions, i.e. some brainstormed actions will simply not be a good idea as an early move, but may remain excellent options for future moves.

You should also indicate a timeline showing your early choices of actions (the low hanging fruit) and the later actions that you plan to implement (e.g. now, 1 year, 3-5 yrs, 10 yrs), along with your justification for those decisions (using the prioritization questions as a guide).

Presentation Style:
The presenter(s) spoke clearly and at an appropriate speed & volume. The presenter spoke directly to the audience and not to the slides/screen/whiteboard. The presenter did not read from notes too much.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments:
The visuals (if used) were clear and effective. There wasn't too much or too little information on the slides, and the number of slides was appropriate.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments'.
The group answered questions professionally and clearly.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments:
Presentation Content:
A Step: The group presented a clear overview of the organization as well as a compelling vision.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments:
В step: The group clearly explained how the organization contributes to violations of the Sustainability Principles.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments:
В step: The group clearly explained the positive aspects of the organization, how it helps society comply with the Sustainability Principles.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair /Good /Excellent Comments:
С step: The group presented a creative list of actions to reduce and eventually eliminate the organization's contribution to the Sustainability Principles.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments
D step: The group clearly explained the prioritization process they went through as well as why they chose those five high priority actions.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments
D step: The group presented a clear implementation timeline for their list of actions.	Not completed / Minimum Acceptable / Fair / Good / Excellent Comments

My overall feedback to the group is:

Дата добавления: 2015-10-21