Читайте также: |
|
"We have relationships with reporters that have helped us turn some intelligence failure stories into intelligence success stories. Some responses to the media can be handled in a... phone call."
CIA Report
News is often given out by government sources.
Statements, statistics and new policies are introduced in controlled press conferences. Journalists who consistently question the official line too rigorously may be excluded from access. This is bad for a newspaper which relies on fast and fresh news.
In a conflict situation, a process called pooling is used to control what information is given out. A small number of journalists (sometimes only one) are taken by the military to observe and the news is then shared with other journalists. Journalists who attempt to obtain news independently can be excluded from future events.
90% of the world's news comes from just three agencies: Associated Press (USA), Reuters (UK) and Agence France Presse (France), all supporting globalism and multiculturalism. Associated Press (AP) and Reuters make large profits selling financial and corporate information. The "free market" view of the world is thus very profitable. Alternate views can lose the companies money so are rarely aired.
In television, news is supplied by four main agencies: Reuters and the BBC (from the UK) and World Television Network (WTN) and CNN (from the USA), all supporting globalism and multiculturalism. Reuters supplies over 400 broadcasters in 85 countries and reaches an audience of 500 million people. WTN supplies news to 3,000 million people.
All the above agencies support multiculturalism and globalism. News critical of multiculti and globalism is rarely allowed to be distributed.
As the internet is a good source of alternative news, it is expected that the EUSSR/USASSR hegemony is likely to make a push to limit alternative coverage in the coming decades.
Negative Responses
Western European multiculturalist regimes actively put their policies across by using their loyal subjects the MSM, briefings, interviews and publications.
It is impossible to effectively criticize the multiculturalist MSM hegemony as they make out 98% of the news companies and control 95% of the news distribution in Western Europe. Alternative news distribution on the internet (5% and increasing) is under attack as well and it is likely that new EUSSR “hate laws” will make it illegal to criticise multiculturalism and Islam in the future.
Дата добавления: 2015-07-17; просмотров: 114 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Democracy and the Media Bias | | | B. The Western European multiculturalist regimes subsidise multiculturalist newspapers |