Читайте также:
|
|
Table of contents
Introduction. 2
Responsibilities. 3
Mock Recall Process. 3
References. 5
Attachments. 5
Example 1 - Upstream (Top Down) 6
Example 2 - Downstream-External 7
Example 3 - Downstream-Internal 8
Introduction
Definitions | The mock recall is an exercise to test and prove that the traceability system is implemented effectively. Downstream – internal mock recall (bottom – up): One batch of a material is tracked from reception to the semi-finished or finished products. Process and analytical records corresponding to the material are retrieved. Downstream – external mock recall (bottom – up): One finished product is tracked until change of ownership, i.e. until the entity to which it has been invoiced. Process and analytical records corresponding to the finished product are retrieved. Upstream mock recall (top – down): All ingredients of one finished product are tracked up the (vendor) batch number and vendor of the ingredient. Process and analytical records corresponding to the ingredient/material are retrieved. Note: “bottom – up” and “top – down” is the SAP/GLOBE terminology. |
Purpose of this document | This document describes the process for executing a mock recall and how to evaluate the effectiveness of the traceability system. |
Scope | This instruction covers all products manufactured or distributed by Nestlé. In countries where mock recalls are prescribed by regulations, these prevail. |
Target audience | This General Instruction is addressed to: § Technical Managers § Corporate Quality Managers § Corporate Supply Chain Managers § Distribution/Logistics Managers § Factory Managers § Factory Quality Managers |
Responsibilities
Technical Manager | The Technical Manager of a Market/Region/GMB has the overall responsibility of ensuring that the resources are allocated and systems implemented to perform the mock recall. |
Corporate Quality Manager | The Corporate Quality Manager of a Market/Region/GMB is responsible for organizing the mock recall, assessing the results and formulating eventual corrective actions. He/she esures that the necessary trainings are conducted. |
Factory Manager | The Factory Manager ensures that the resources are allocated and systems implemented to perform the mock recall in the factory. |
Factory Quality Manager | The factory QA Manager ensures that the mock recall is carried out according to the indications received from the Corporate Quality Manager. |
Supply Chain, Distribution/Logistics Manager | The Supply Chain and Distribution/Logistics Managers are responsible to deliver the requested data during the exercise and for ensuring that resources are available. |
Mock Recall Process
Frequency and Planning | At least one mock recall must be conducted annually. All manufacturing sites and distribution centers must be covered. The mock recall must be announced in a way that excludes confusion with a real life situation. A representative material/product must be chosen for the mock recall. As stated in the chapter “Responsibilities”, the Corporate Quality Manager leads the whole process. |
Description of scenario | The scenario or hypothetical reason of the “supposed “ recall must be clearly described to give all involved parties a picture of the information needed, e.g. “Allergen x missing on label of product xyz, batch, etc.” or “chemical contamination with compound x in raw material, etc.”. |
Continued on next page
Mock Recall Process, Continued
Questions to be answered | The following questions must be answered during the mock recall: Downstream – internal (bottom-up) § What quantity of the material in question has been received? § Are the results of the relevant analytical parameters of the material available? § Where and when has the material been used? § Are the results of the relevant process and analytical parameters of the receiving products available? Downstream – external (bottom-up) § Are the process and analytical records of the material available? § What is the location (factory, distribution center, customer, transit) of the material in question? § What quantity exists in or has been dispatched to each location? § At what date did the first dispatch to a customer occur? (Is it possible that some product has been already consumed?) § Does the system information correspond to the physical stock? (Verify the physical inventory at 2 sites) Upstream (top-down) § Are the relevant process records and results available for this product? § What are the ingredients of this product and which ones are relevant for the mock recall scenario? § Are the results of relevant analytical parameters of the concerned ingredients available? § Who are the vendors of the concerned ingredients? See also the forms attached. |
Results | The following figures must be calculated to judge the degree of success of the mock recall: § % of product accounted for § Availability of analytical records § Does the system quantity correspond to the physical stock at the two sites? § Time required to collect the data |
Targets | Internal targets must be set for accuracy (% of accounted products and availability of records) and time to collect the data. Time targets might also be set by our customers or regulatory agencies. |
Evaluation and continuous improvement | The exercise must be evaluated and an action plan established. Results and outcome are discussed in the MRQ. |
References
Documents | § GI-31.115, Traceabilty System § GI-31.103, Guideline on Crisis Preparedness and Management § GI-31.097, Handbook for Crisis Preparedness and Management § GLOBE QRC for Recall and Mock Recall Exercise § GLOBE QRC for Recall quantity reconciliation § GI-31.200, Nestlé Food Safety Management System § ISO 22000, Food Safety Management Systems-Requirements for any organization in the food chain |
Attachments
Examples | Mock recall - Examples |
Example 1 - Upstream (Top Down)
MOCK RECALL Results upstream – top down | Date 06.02.2008 Time 13:45 |
Section 1. BASIC DATA | |
PLANT | WISTERY |
MATERIAL | Beef Soup Mix bulk 1x25kg |
SAP Number | |
BATCH NUMBER | |
SLED (BBD, Use By or Exp. Date) | |
Hypothetical Reason | Pathogen presence |
Materials with deviations | To be confirmed (use the “where to use” list) |
Section 2. MATERIALS USED | |
Qty. Produced (1) | 12000 kg |
Beef extract (Liebig) | 400 kg batch xyz, 200 kg batch abc |
Onion powder (Tro-Kost) | 240 kg batch abc |
Leek granules (Tro-Kost) | 120 kg batch xyz |
Hydrolizate RFB (Givaudan) | 400 kg batch abc |
Other Materials used | See attached list (not shown) |
Section 3. TIME REQUIRED(from the notice up to the reception of the documents) | |
Hours/Minutes | 1:30 |
Section 4. DOCUMENTATION | ||||
Item | Documentation | required | accounted | Result |
Critical raw materials | · COA | 100% | ||
Other materials | · COA | 75% | ||
Process (Line Controls) and Inspections | · Organoleptic · Microbiological · CCP records · Release/UD code | X X X x | yes yes yes yes | Ok Ok Ok Ok |
Finished Products involved | · Release/UD code · Micro Monitoring | X X | Yes No results | Ok See below |
Section 5. CONCLUSIONS AND ACTIONS |
Objectives achieved The requested micro monitoring results of finished products are not foreseen in the inspection plan. This is accepted as the line is monitored correctly. |
Дата добавления: 2015-10-30; просмотров: 739 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Мавлянова Надира Ганиевна, д.г.-м.н., гнс ИГЭ РАН | | | ПЕРЕДМОВА до VI-го видання |