by preschool-age children. In J.P. Murray, E.A.Robinson, & G.A.Comstock (Eds.).
Television and social behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 257-344). Rockville, MD: National Insti-
tutes of Health.
13. Lyle, J., & Hoffman, H. (1971). Children's use of television and other media.
In J.P. Murray, E.A. Robinson, and G.M. Comstock (Eds.), Television and social
behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 129-256). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.
14. Bern, D. (1970). Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/
Cole.
15. Zajonc, R. (1968). The attidudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Person-
ality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 9, 1-27.
16. Crush, J., McKeough, Љ., &Ahlering, R. (1978). Extrapolating laboratory expo-
sure research to actual political elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
36, 257-270.
17. Crush, J.E. (1980). Impact of candidate expenditures, regionality, and prior
outcomes on the 1976 presidential primaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 38,337-347.
18. White, J.E. (1988, November 14). Bush's most valuable player. Time,
pp. 20-21.
19. Rosenthal, A. (1988, October 24). Foes accuse Bush campaign of inflaming
racial tension. The New York Times, pp. Al, B5. Pandora's box (1988, October). The
New Republic, pp. 4, 45.
20. Tolchin, M. (1988, October 12). Study says 53.000 get prison furloughs in '87,
and few did harm. The New York Times, p. A23.
21. Pratkanis, A.R., & Aronson, E. (1992). The age of propaganda: The everyday use
and abuse of persuasion. New York: W.H. Freeman.
22. Pratkanis, A.R. (1993). Propaganda and persuasion in the 1992 U.S. presiden-
tial election: What are the implications for a democracy? Current World Leaders, 36,
341-361.
23. Zimbardo, P., Ebbesen, E., & Maslach, C. (1977). Influencing attitudes and changing
behavior (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of
persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 123-
205). Hillside, NJ: Eribaum.
25. Aristotle (1954). Rhetoric. In W. Roberts (Trans.), Aristotle, rhetoric and poetics
(p. 25). New York: Modern Library. ђгб. ЇҐа. - <ђЁв®аЁЄ ЂаЁбв®вҐ«п>. ЏҐа.
€. Џ«в®®ў®©. ‘ЏЎ., 1894. Ѓ «и®ў Ё Љш.
26. Hovland, ‘., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on com-
munication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
27. Aronson, E., & Golden, B. (1962). The effect of relevant and irrelevant aspects
of communicator credibility on opinion change. Journal of Personality, 30, 135-146.
28. Walster(Hatfield), E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the
persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychol-
ogy, 2,325-342.
29. Eagly, A., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communi-
cators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-
gy, 36, 424-435.
30. Santa Cru^ Sentinel, January 13, 1987, p. A8.
31. Walster(Hatfield), E., & Festinger, L. (1962). The effectiveness of <overheard>
persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 395-402.
32. Mills, J., & Aronson, E. (1965). Opinion change as a function of communica-
tor's attractiveness and desire to influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-
gy, 1,173-177.
33. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analysis of the effect of com-
municator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractive-
ness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 136-144.
34. Hartmann, G. (1936). A field experience on the comparative effectiveness of
<emotional> and <rational> political leaflets in determining election results. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 336-352.
35. Leventhal, Ќ. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communica-
tions. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119-
186). New York: Academic Press.
36. Leventhal, Ќ., Meyer, D., & Neren^, D. (1980). The common sense representa-
tion of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Contributions to medical psychology (Vol. 2).
New York: Pergamon Press.
37. Time, February 16, 1987, pp. 50-53.
38. San Francisco Chronicle, June 19, 1987, p. 9.
39. Leishman, Љ. (1987, February). Heterosexuals and AIDS. The Atlantic Monthly,
pp. 39-58.
40. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally rele-
vant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 669-679.
41. dark III, R.D. (1990). The impact of AIDS on gender differences in willing-
ness to engage in casual sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 771-782.
42. Leishman, Љ. (1987, February). The Atlantic Monthly. Heterosexuals and AIDS,
p. 44.
43. Williams, S.S., Kimble, D.L., Cowell, N.H., Weiss, L.H., Newton, K.J., Fisher, J.D.,
& Fisher, W.A. (1992). College students use implicit personality theory instead of safe
sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 921-933.
44. Hirschom, M. (1987, April 29). AIDS not seen as a major threat by heterosex-
uals on campuses. Chronicle of Higher Education.
45. Aronson, E. (1989). Excuses, excuses, excuses: Why sexually active college
students do not use condoms. Invited address, meeting of the Western Psychological
Association, 1989.
46. Aronson, E. (1991). How to persuade sexually active college students to use
condoms. Invited address, meeting of the American Psychological Association, San
Francisco, California.
47. Nisbett, R., Borgida, E, Crandall, R., & Reed, Ќ. (1976). Popular introduction:
Information is not always informative. In J.S. Carroll and J.W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition
and social behavior^. 227-236). Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L.
(1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hamill, R., DeCamp Wllson, ’., & Nisbett, R. (1980). Insensiv-
ity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 39, 578-589.?Ґ««Ё ’Ґ©«®а, б®жЁ «мл© ЇбЁе®«®Ј-Є®ЈЁвЁўЁбв,
г⢥ত Ґв, зв® нд䥪в <паЄ®бвЁ> Ґ Ї®¤вўҐа¦¤ Ґвбп Ў®«миЁбвў®
нЄбЇҐаЁҐв «мле १г«мв в®ў. ЋЎб㦤ҐЁҐ нв®© вҐл - б.: Taylor, S., &
Thompson, S. (1982). Stalking the elusive <vividness> effect. Psychological Review, 89,
155-181.
48. Gonzales, M.H., Aronson, E., & Costanzo, M. (1988). Increasing the effectiveness
of energy auditors: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1049-
1066.
49. Hovland, ‘., Lumsdain, A., & Sheffield, F. (1949). Experiments on mass commu-
nications. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50. Miller, N., & Campbell, D. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a
function of the timing of speeches and measurements. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 59,1-9.
51. Zimbardo, P. (1960). Involvement and communication discrepancy as deter-
minants of opinion conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 86-94.
52. Whittaker, J.O. (1963). Opinion change as a function of communication-
attitude discrepancy. Psychological Reports, 13, 763-772.
53. Hovland, ‘., Harvey, O.J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects
in reaction to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 55,244-252.
54. Aronson, E., Turner, J., & Carlsmith, J.M. (1963). Communication credibility
and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnor-
mal and Social Psychology, 67,31-36.
55. Zellner, M. (1970). Self-esteem, reception, and influenceability. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 87-93.
56. Janis, I.J., Kaye, D., & Kirschner, P. (1965). Facilitating effects of <eating-
while-reading> on responsiveness to persuasive communication. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 1, 181-186.
57. Hass, R.G., & Grady, K. (1975). Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and
resistance to influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, II, 459-469.
58. Freedman, J., & Sears, D. (1965). Warning, distraction, and resistance to
influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 262-266.
59. Brehm, J. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic
Press.
60. Bensley, L.S., & Wu, R. (1991). The role ofpsychological reactance in drinking
following alcohol prevention messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21,
1111-1124.
61. Heilman, M. (1976). Oppositional behavior as a function of influence attempt
intensity and retaliation threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 574-
578.
62. Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1977). Forewarning, cognitive responding, and re-
sistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 645-655.
63. Festinger, L., & Maccoby, N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communica-
tions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366.
64. Sloan, L., Love,R., & Ostrom, T. (1974). Political heckling: Who really loses?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 518-525.
65. McGuire, W., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy ofvarious types of
prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal
and Social Psychology, 62, 327-337.
66. McAlister, A., Perry, ‘., Killen, J., Slinkard, L.A., & Maccoby, N. (1980). Pilot
study of smoking, alcohol and drug abuse prevention. American Journal of Public
Health, 70,719-721.
67. Pryor, ‚., & Steinfatt, W. (1978). The effects of initial belief level on inoculation
theory and its proposed mechanisms. Human Communications Research, 4, 217-230.
68. Canon, L. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information.
In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, desision, and dissonance (pp. 83-96). Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
69. TV violence for a new generation (1987). TV Monitor (p. 2). San Francisco:
The Children's Television Resource and Education Center.
70. ‘в вЁбвЁЄ ў§пв Ё§: Pratkanis, A.R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Age of propa-
ganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York: W.H. Freeman.
71. Liebert, R. (1975, July 16). Testimony before the Subcommittee on Commu-
nications of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.
72. San Francisco Chronicle, August 25, 1979, p. 15. San Francisco Sunday Examiner
and Chronicle, August 26, 1979, p. 2. San Jose Mercury-News, February II, 1982, p. A2.
73. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorelli, N. (1986). Living with television:
The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives
on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum.
74. –Ёв. Ї®: Newsweek, December 6, 1982, p. 140.
75. Haney, ‘., & Manwlati, /.(1981). Television criminology: Network illusions of
criminal justice realities. In Readings about the social animal (6th ed., pp. 120-131).
San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
76. Hennigan, K., Heath, L., Wharton, J.D., DelRosario, M., Cook, ’., & Colder, B.
(1982). Impact of the introduction of television on crime in the United States: Empir-
ical findings and theoretical implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
42, 461-477.
77. Ronis,D.,Baumgardner, M., Leippe, M.,Cacioppo, J., & Greenwald, A. (1977). In
search of reliable persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 548-569.
Љ Ј«ўҐ 4
‘®жЁ «м®Ґ Ї®§ ЁҐ
1. Lippmann,W. (\911).Public opinion.^ew York: Harcourt, Brace, & Co.
2. €Ґ® ў ⥠ўаҐҐ ў®§ЁЄ ®Ўлз ©, б®Ј«б® Є®в®а®г г¦зЁ ¤®«-
¦Ґ Ўл«Ё¤вЁ в Є, зв®Ўл <ЇаЁЄалў вм> ¦ҐйЁг ®в Їа®Ґ§¦Ґ© з бвЁ г«Ёжл.
‚ нЇ®ег б।ҐўҐЄ®ўмп Ї®¤®Ўл© ®Ўлз © Є § «бп ўЇ®«Ґ ®блб«Ґл: б Ї®-
ЈЁ г¦зЁл, Ґб«Ё Ёе § Ўал§Ј Ґв Јап§мо, Ўл«® «ҐЈзҐ ®взЁбвЁвм, зҐ Ї«вмҐ
¦ҐйЁл.
3. Panati, ‘. (1987). Extraordinary origins of everyday things. New York: Harper &
Row.
4. Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn 't so. New York: Free Press.
5. Bentham, J. (1876/1948). A fragment on government and an introduction to the
principles of morals and legislation.Oxford: Blackwell.Pyc.nep, - €§Ўа лҐ б®зЁҐЁп
€ҐаҐЁЁ ЃҐв. ’. 1. ‘ЇЎ., ђгббЄ п ЄЁ¦ п в®аЈ®ў«п. 1867, ‘®ўаҐҐго ўҐабЁо
<Є «мЄг«пжЁЁ Ў«Ј > - б.: Fishbein, M., &.Ђ^ҐЇ, J. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention,
and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Kelley, H.H. (1967), Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.),
Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-241). Lincoln: University of Ne-
braska Press. Kelley, H.H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psycholo-
gist, 28, 107-128.
7. ‚лбЄ §лў Ґвбп ЁвҐаҐб п лб«м ® в®, зв® ¤ ¦Ґ гзҐлҐ Ґ ўбҐЈ¤
лб«пв Є Є гзҐлҐ, Ї®¤Ї ¤ п Ї®¤ ¤Ґ©бвўЁҐ вҐе ЇаҐ¤а ббг¤Є®ў, Є®в®алҐ ®ЇЁб -
л ў ¤ ®© Ј«ўҐ. CM. Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M.R., &
Baumgardner, M.H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research
process? Psychological Review, 93, 216-229.
8. Fiske, S. ’., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent of man. Boston: Little, Brown, Co.
Pratkanis, A.R., & Aronson, E. (1991). The age of propaganda: The everyday use and
abuse of persuasion. New York: W.H. Freeman.
10. Pratkanis, A.R., Farquhar, P.H., Silbert, S., & Hearst, J. (1989). Decoys produce
contrast effects and alter choice probabilities. University of California, Santa Cruz.
II. Kenrick, D. ’., & Guttieres, S.E. (1980). Contrast effects in judgements of at-
tractiveness: When beauty becomes a social probern. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 38,131-140.
12. Higgins, E.T., Rholes, W.S., & Jones, C.R. (1977). Category accessibility and
impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
13. Heath, L., Acklin, M., & Wiley, K. (1991). Cognitive heuristics and AIDS risk
assessment among physicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1859-
1867.
14. Rogers, E.M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988), Agenda-setting research: Where has it
been, Where is it going? In J.A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook II (pp.
555-594). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
15. McCombs, M.E., & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass
media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
16. lyengar, S., & Kinder, D.R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University
of Chicago Press.
17. –Ёв. Ї®: Rogers and Dearing, Agenda-setting research.
18, Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American
Psychologist, 39,341-350.
19. Gonzales, M.H.,Aronson, E., & Costan^o, M. (1988). Increasing the effectiveness
of energy auditors: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1046-
1066.
20. Meyerowitz, ‚.E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on
breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 52,500-510.
21. Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 41,258-290.
22. Jones, E.E., Rock, L., Shaver, K.G., Goethals, G.R., & Ward, L.M. (1968). Pattern
of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 10, 317-340.
23. Aronson, J.M., & Jones, E.E. (1992). Inferring abilities after influencing per-
formance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 277-299.
24. Zukier, ff. (1982). The dilution effect: The role of the correlation and disper-
sion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information. Journal of Person-
ality and Social Psychology, 43,1163-1174.
25. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of
social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Sherman, S.J., & Corty, E. (1984).
Cognitive heuristics. In R.S.Wyer & T.K.Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition
(Vol. I, pp. 189-286), Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974).
Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
26. <Which cereal for breakfast?> Consumer Reports, February 1981, pp. 68-75.
27. ‘а ўҐЁҐ ®б®ў ® : <Eating to lower your blood cholesterol>. U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, NIH Publication No. 87-2920,
September 1987. Ѓл«® Ї®Є § ®, зв® блйҐлҐ ¦ЁалҐ ЄЁб«®вл - вҐ, зв®
ᮤҐа¦ вбп ў пᥠ¦Ёў®вле Ё ®в¤Ґ«мле ўЁ¤ е а бвЁвҐ«мле ¦Ёа®ў (ў Є®Є®-
б®ў®, и®Є®«¤®, Ї «м®ў® Ё ў® ўбҐе ЈЁ¤аЁа®ў ле б«е), Ї®ўли ов
га®ўҐм е®«ҐбвҐа®«. €§Ј®в®ўЁвҐ«Ё е«®ЇмҐў Ё®Ј¤ ЁбЇ®«м§гов Ї®¤®ЎлҐ ¦Ёал
ў бў®Ёе Їа®¤гЄв е - ®б®ЎҐ® Є®Є®б®ў®Ґ, Ї «м®ў®Ґ Ё ЈЁ¤аЁа®ў лҐ б«.
—в®Ўл ЁбЄ«озЁвм Ёе, ®ЈЁҐ Їа®Ё§ў®¤ЁвҐ«Ё е«®ЇмҐў ў бв®п饥 ўаҐп § п-
вл Ё§ҐҐЁҐ б®бв ў бў®Ёе Їа®¤гЄв®ў - в Є зв®, ЇҐаҐ¤ ⥠Є Є ЇаЁпвм
®Є®з ⥫쮥 аҐиҐЁҐ, Є Є®© ЁҐ® б®ав Ї®ЄгЇ вм, ўЁ вҐ«м® ®§ Є®м-
вҐбм б вҐ, зв® ЇЁб ® Є®а®ЎЄҐ.
28. Nisbett & Ross (1980); Shweder, R. (1977). Likeness and likelihood in every-
day thought: Magical thinking in judgments about personality. Current Anthropology,
18, 637-658.
29. Pratkanis, A.R. (1989). The cognitive representation of attitudes. In A.R.
Pratkanis, S.J. Bleckler, & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function
(pp. 71-98). Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum. Pratkanis, A.R., & Greenwald, A.G. (1989). A socio-
cognitive model of attitude structure and function. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 245-285). New York: Academic Press.
30. Pratkanis, A.R. (1988). The attitude heuristic and selective fact identification.
British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 257-263.
31. Thistlewaite, D. (1950). Attitude and structure as factors in the distortion of
reasoning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 442-458.
32. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The <false-consensus> effect: An
egocentric bias in social perception and attribution process. Journal of Experimental
Soda! Psychology, 13,279-301.
33. Pratkanis, Cognitive representation.
34. Ћ «Ў®а в®а®© ¤Ґ®бва жЁЁ - б.: Gilovich, ’. (1981). Seeing the past
in the present: The effect of associations to familiar judgments and decisions. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 797-808.
35. Darley, J.M., & Gross, P.ff. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling
effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20-33.
36. Hamilton, D.L., & Ross, T.L. (1980). Illusory correlation and the maintenance
ofstereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 832-845.
37. Pratkanis, A.R. ‹Ёз®Ґ б®®ЎйҐЁҐ.
38. Chapman, L.J. (1967). Illusory correlation in observational report. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 151-155. Chapman, L.J., & Chapman, J.P.
(1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 72, 193-204. Chapman, L.J., & Chapman, J.P. (1969). Illusory
correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnor-
mal Psychology, 74,271-280.
39. Park, ‚., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and
levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group
and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.
40. ЋЎ§®ал Ё ¤ЁбЄгббЁо - б.: Tajfel, Ќ. (1981). Human groups and social
categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Turner, J.C. (1987), Rediscovering
the social group. New York: Basil Blackwell.
41. Loflus, E.F., & Loftus, G.R. (1980). On the permanence of stored information
in the human brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409-420.
42. Loftus, E.F., & Ketchum, Љ. (1991). Witness forthe defense. New York: St.Martin's
Press.
43. Loftus, E.F., & Palmer, J.C. (1974). Reconstruction ofautomobile destruction:
An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
44. Loftus, E.F. (1977). Shifting human color memory. Memory and Cognition, 5,
696-699.
45. Loftus, E.F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist,
48, 518-537.
46. Ross, M., McFarland, ‘., & Fletcher, G.O.J. (1981). The effect of attitude on the
recall of personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 627-634.
47. Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching students to learn. Milton Keynes, England: Open
University Press.
48. Pratkanis, A.R., Eskenaw, J., & Greenwald, A. G. (1990). What you expect is what
you believe (but not necessarily what you get): On the effectiveness of subliminal self-
help audiotapes.Unpublished manuscript.University of Santa Cruz. Greenwald, A.G.,
Spangenberg, E.R., Pratkanis, A.R., & Eskena^i, J. (1991). Double-blind tests of sublimi-
nal self-help audiotapes. Psychological Science, 12, 119-122.
49. Conway, M., & Ross, M. (1984). Getting what you want by revising what you
had. JoumalofPersonality andSocial Psychology, 47, 738-748.
50. Wyatt, D.F., & Campbell, D. T. (1951). On the liability of stereotype or hypoth-
esis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 496-500. Bruner, J.S., & Potter,
M.C. (1964). Science, 144, 424-425.
51. Snyder, M., & Swann, W.B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social in-
teraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
52. Fischhoff, ‚. (1975). Hindsight does not equal foresight: The effect of out-
come knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-299. Fischhoff, ‚. (1977). Perceived inform-
ativeness offacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perform-
ance, 3,349-358.
53. Greenwald, A.G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of
personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
54. LaPier, R. (1934). Attitudes versus actions. Social Forces, 13, 230-237.
55. Wicker, A. ^.(1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal
and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25 (4),
41-78.
56. Jones, E.E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W.H. Freeman. Jones,
E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person
perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2,
pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
57. Jones, E.E., & Harris, V.A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Ex-
perimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
58. Favo, R.H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R.M. Sorrentino &
E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 204-242). New York:
Guilford Press. Fa^io, R.H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The
role of attitude accessibility. In A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler, &A.G. Greenwald (Eds.),
Attitude structure and function (pp. 153-179). Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum.
59. Fa^io, R.H., & Williams, C.J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of
the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984
presidential elections. JoumalofPersonality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
60. Fazio, R.H., Chen, J., McDonel, E.G., & Sherman, S.J. (1982). Attitude accessibil-
ity, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation associ-
ation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 339-357. Fa^io, R.H., Powell, M.C., &
Herr, P.M. (1983). Toward a process model of attitude-behavior relation: Accesing
one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 44, 723-735. Favo, R.H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experi-
ence and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Exper-
imental Social Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 162-202). New York: Academic Press.
Regan, D.T., & Fa^io, R.H. (1977). On the consistency between attitudes and behav-
ior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psy-
chology, 13,38-45.
61. Herr, P.M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.
62. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortion in
the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psy-
chology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
63. Bierbrauer, G. (1973). Effect of set, perspective, and temporal factors in
attribution. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. –Ёв. Ї®: Ross (1977).
64. Ross, L., Amabile, T.M., & Steinmet^, J.L. (1977). Social roles, social control,
and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
35, 485-494.
65. ЋвўҐвл: бв ¤Ё® <”®аЎб> ў ЏЁввбЎгаЈҐ, ‚Ё«моб Ё 4 Ёо«п 1826 Ј®¤.
66. Jones, ….…., & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent
Дата добавления: 2015-08-28; просмотров: 33 | Нарушение авторских прав
| <== предыдущая лекция | | | следующая лекция ==> |