Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

The Theory of Substratum

THE ARTICLE. | CATEGORY OF MODALITY IN THE SENTENCE | STATIVES | THE CATEGORY OF MOOD. INDICATIVE. IMPERATIVE. | Grammatical categories of the verb | THE VERB – MEANING, FORM, FUNCTION. PRINCIPLES OF CLASSIFICATION. | The Theory of parts of speech in prenormative &classical gr-s. | The theory of parts of speech in American Descriptive Grammar. | The Theory of Progress, the Functional Theory. | ANALYTICAL FEATURES OFWORD-BUILDING |


Читайте также:
  1. The Phrase Theory.
  2. The theory of parts of speech in American Descriptive Grammar.
  3. The Theory of parts of speech in prenormative &classical gr-s.
  4. The Theory of Progress, the Functional Theory.

This theory is also known as the theory of mixture of languages. In case of foreign invasions when invadors submit the native tribes & settle on the conquered territory it is necessary to work out means of communication which would be understandable both for the invadors & for the submitted tribes. In the process of working out these means of communication one of the 2 languages spoken by the communicating sides serves as the substratum (основа) upon which the new language is developed.

During the 8-9th centuries AD the northern east part of Britain was conquered and inhabited by the Scandinavian tribes which were mainly represented by the Danes. The O.E. of the original population which was represented by the Anglo-Saxons came into contact with the Danes & in the process og their communication the OE language served as the substratum upon which a new system communication began developing. OE & Danish were related languages because both belonged to the group Germanic languages it means a great number of words in those languages had the same root but different endings. E.g. OE—sunu; wind. Danish—sunr; windr.

The similarity of roots meet the process of communication easy & possible in many cases even without interpreting. But the difference of inflections prevented the speakers from proper understanding. For this reason as the authors of this theory believed, the endings began to be weakly pronounced, then reduced & finally dropped.

The theory was developed by comparativists who studied related languages. Among the authors we can mention A Meillet. There is no doubt common sense in this theory because languages in their development are regulated not only by inner linguistics facts & reasons but extraling factors of politic, economic & cultural life. The result of foreign invasion is especially obvious in E-sh which is connected with the Norman conquest but after contact with other languages. It is usually vocabulary or word stock of the language which is most strongly affected by the invasion (70% of E-sh words are of French origin). As for grammar it can’t be so easily penetrated by foreign influences that’s why the reasons which reconstructed the E-sh grammatical type should be booked for in the language itself. This is done by the representatives of the 4th theory which is called the functional theory.

 


Дата добавления: 2015-10-02; просмотров: 54 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Phonetic approach| Basic features of English syntax

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.005 сек.)