Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Different opinions in the nature of phoneme

Phonetics as a science | The connection of phonetics with non-linguistic sciences. | Position of the tongue. | Glossary of phonetic terms | Modification of consonants and vowels in connected speech | Theories of syllable formation | Glossary of phonetic terms | Accent-attracting suffixes (suffixes carrying primary stress themselves). | I. The primary stress on the first element. | Structure of the tone unit |


Читайте также:
  1. A different approach to the job
  2. A Teacher’s Lot Is Certainly a Different One
  3. A The following are dictionary definitions of different types of markets.
  4. A) Read the text below to find out about using gestures in different cultures.
  5. Academia in the process of globalization. Its intercultural nature
  6. Adverbs which have different meanings
  7. Aesthetics as a differentiating factor

Psychological (Mentalistic) view regards the phoneme as an ideal “mental image” at which the speaker aims. The originator of the theory, I.A. Baudauin de Courtenay viewed phonemes as fictitious units and considered them to be only perceptions. The theory has been adopted by American structuralists E.D. Sapir and L.B. Bloomfield, who defined phoneme as a minimum unit of distinctive-sound features, an abstractional fiction.

Functional view regards the phoneme as the minimal sound unit by which meanings may be differentiated without much regard to actually pronounced speech sounds. This view is shared by L.B. Bloomfield, R. Jackobson, M. Halle and N.S. Trubetskoy, representative of the Prague linguistic school, who defined the phoneme as a unity of phonologically relevant features.

Abstract view of the phoneme regards phonemes as essentially independent of the acoustic and physiological properties associated with them, that is, of speech sounds. This view of the phoneme was pioneered by L. Hjelmslev and his associates in the Copenhagen Linguistic Circle, H. J. Uldall and K. Togby.

The physical view regards the phoneme as a “family” of related sounds satisfying certain conditions. The view was introduced by D. Jones representative of the London School of phonology, who defined phonemes as a family of sounds. The view was shared by B. Bloch and G. Trager. Representative of the French linguistic school Ferdinand de Saussure viewed phonemes as the sum of acoustic impressions and articulatory movements.

Notation

Transcription is a set of symbols representing speech sounds. The symbolization of sounds differs according to whether the aim is to indicate the phoneme or to reflect the modifications of its allophones.

I. The Broad or phonemic transcription provides special symbols for all the phonemes of a language and mainly used for practical purposes.

Phonemic transcription is based on the principle “one symbol per phoneme”. A phoneme is reflected in this transcription as an abstraction and generalization. The symbols are usually placed between two slanting lines: /p/, /b/, /i/, /u: / etc.

II. The Narrow or allophonic transcription is based on the principle “one symbol per allophone”. This transcription provides a special sign for each variant of each phoneme (diacritics): [khit]. A phoneme is reflected in this transcription as a unity of all its allophones. The symbols are usually placed between square brackets [ ]. The narrow type serves the purposes of research work.


Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 378 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Phoneme as a functional, material and abstract linguistic unit| Manner of noise production and the type of obstruction.

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.006 сек.)