Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Logical Fallacies

Essay Introduction | Techniques for Writing Essay Introduction | What is a Classification Essay? | Three Organizational Methods. | Transition expressions. | Coherence in Reaction Essays. | Methods of Organization for Argumentative Essays. |


Читайте также:
  1. A claim should be well organized with information in a logical order.
  2. A contrastive analysis of English and Ukrainian morphological stylistic means
  3. A) Biological Sciences
  4. According to their morphological composition adjectives can be subdivided intosimple, derived andcompound.
  5. Anatomy, histology and physiology of the normal skin. Histomorphological changes in the skin.
  6. And you will GET PRACTICAL TIPS how to read and speak rhythmically, observing logical shift of sentence stress and making logical pauses.
  7. Avoiding Logical Fallacies

Fallacies are errors or flaws in reasoning. Although essentially unsound, fallacious arguments often have great persuasive power. Fallacies are not necessarily deliberate efforts to deceive readers. They may be accidental, resulting from a failure to examine underlying assumptions critically, establish solid ground to support a claim, or choose words that are clear and precise. Here, listed are the most common logical fallacies:

1. Begging the question. Arguing that a claim is true by repeating the claim in different words. Sometimes called circular reasoning.

2. Confusing chronology with casualty. Assuming that because one thing preceded another, the former caused the latter.

3. Either/or reasoning. Assuming that there are only two sides to a question, and representing yours as the only correct one.

4. Equivocating. Misleading or hedging with ambiguous word choices.

5. Failing to accept the burden of proof. Asserting a claim without presenting a reasoned argument to support it.

6. False analogy. Assuming that because one thing resembles another, conclusions drawn from one also apply to the other.

7. Overreliance on authority. Assuming that something is true simply because an expert says so and ignoring evidence to the contrary.

8. Hasty generalization. Offering only weak or limited evidence to support a conclusion.

9. Oversimplifying. Giving easy answers to complicated questions, often by appealing to emotions rather than logic.

10. Personal attack. Demeaning the proponents of a claim instead of their argument.

11. Red herring Attempting to misdirect the discussion by raising an essentially unrelated point.

12. Slanting. Selecting or emphasizing the evidence that supports your claim and suppressing or playing down other evidence.

13. Slippery slope. Pretending that one thing inevitably leads to another.

14. Sob story. Manipulating readers’ emotions in order to lead them to draw unjustified conclusions.

15. Straw man. Directing the argument against a claim that nobody actually holds or that everyone agrees is very weak.

 

Paraphrasing, Summarizing, and Synthesizing in Academic Writing.

Plagiarism is passing off someone else’s writing and ideas as your own – like stealing what belongs to someone else. It is a serious issue in academic circles. In order to use source materials correctly and avoid plagiarism, learn the skills of paraphrasing, summarizing, and synthesizing and then apply correct documentation format.


Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 39 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Unity in Argumentative Essays| What Are Paraphrasing, Summarizing, and Synthesizing?

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.006 сек.)