Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Drilling fluids

Читайте также:
  1. Density of drilling fluids.
  2. Drilling contractor
  3. Drilling systems
  4. RECOMMENDED FLUIDS AND LUBRICANTS

Directional

 

Data given:

Water depth = 430 ft MSL

Rig floor elevation = 70 ft MSL

Hydrogen Sulphide = 0 mol%

Carbon Dioxide = 0 mol%

 

  N ft E ft TVD ft brt
Surface location of rig 0.00 0.00 0.00
Target location 5320.00 0.00 9500.00
TD 5320.00 0.00 10250.00

 

KOP (immediately below surface) = 2.00 deg/100 ft

DOP (where needed to be) = 4.00 deg/100 ft

Calculation of the radius of curvature:

V1 = 1000 ft TVD brt

V4 = 9500 ft TVD brt

D3 = 5320 ft

V5 = 10250 ft

Manual profile has to be chosen:

R1 + R2 = 2865+1432 = 4297 ft, which is less than 5320 ft, i.e. R1 + R2 < total target distance.

Line X = D3 – (R1 + R2) = 5320 – 4297 = 1023 ft

= = 7406 ft

Angle = Angle FOG + = 30.1 + 6.9 = 370

 

End of build

Measured depth = V1 + = 1000 + = 2850 ft

Vertical depth (V2) = V1 + R1 = 1000 + 2865*sin(370) = 2724 ft

Displacement (D1) = R1 (1-cos ) = 2865*(1-0.798) = 577 ft

Start of drop

Measured depth = V1 + + OG = 2850 + 7406 = 10256 ft

Vertical depth (V3) = V2 + OG*cos = 2724 + 7406*cos370 = 8639 ft

Displacement (D2) = D1 + OG*sin = 577 + 7406*sin370 = 5034 ft

End of drop

Measured depth = V1 + + OG + = 1000 + + 7406 + = 11181 ft

V4 = 9500 ft

D3 = 5320 ft

“S” profile design

“S” profile MD ft Inc 0 Azi 0 TVD ft N ft E ft DLS 0/100ft
Tie-in              
KOP              
End of build              
Start of drop              
End of drop              
TD              

 

Casing

 

Data given:

Rig floor elevation (RFE) = 430 ft

Water depth (WD) = 70 ft

Density of sea water (ρsw) = 0.45 psi/ft

 

 

where:

ρr: density of return fluid

ρf: density formation

 

The value of ρr is obtained by adding density of cuttings to seawater density, so it is 9.1 ppg, or 0.476 psi/ft. Convergent factor of 0.052 was used. From the information of fracture gradient at certain depth, ρf is calculated:

 

In order to find the depth of conductor, the following equation is used:

 

Casing Conductor Surface Intermediate Production Production Liner
ft TVD brt          
ft TVD brt          

 

Measured Depth from directional plan

Conductor’s MD remains the same as TVD. Adding rig floor elevation and water depth, afterwards subtracting the result from TVDbrt surface casing, the measured depth of surface casing is obtained. 1000 – (430+70) = 500 ft SS.

In order to calculate the Measured Depth for intermediate casing, subsea length of the end of build was obtained, it is 2850 – 500 = 2350 ft MDSS. The difference in TVD subsea from final point of intermediate casing to the TVD point end of build and angle were used to get second part of intermediate casing: (4200-2224)/cos370 = 2474 ft. For the purpose of calculating the Measured Depth of intermediate casing we add these values together:

2350 + 2474 = 4824 ft MD ft subsea.

Measured Depth of production casing is taken from question 1 (i.e. “S” design profile), and the rig floor elevation and water depth values were subtracted: 11181 – 500 = 10681 MD ft subsea.

Measured Depth of production liner is calculated using the same way: 11931 – 500 = 11431 MDftSS.

API 5C2 was examined and wt/ft of J-55 with 20̋ outer diameter and wt/ft of P-110 were used to select the nominal weights. Drift diameter (DD) is considered as minimum allowable assured diameter, therefore attention needs to be paid for that. In order to reduce uncertainties, the inner diameters should be close to next diameter.

 

  Casing   Grade Nominal weight, lb/ft Di (inside diameter), inch Do (outer diameter), inch DD (drift diameter) inch Collapse resistance, psi Pipe body yield, 1000 lb DB, (diameter of bit), inch
Surface J-55   18.73   18.542     17.5
Intermediate P-110   12.415 13.375 12.259     12.25
Production P-110   8.681 9.625 8.525     8.5
Production liner P-110   6.184   6.059      

 

 

Cementing

Data given:

  Top Lead Height of tail Shoe track length Outer diameter Inner diameter
Conductor n/a seabed 40 ft    
Surface casing seabed 500 ft 40 ft   API 5C2
Intermediate casing   500 ft 80 ft 13 3/8 API 5C2
Production casing n/a 500 ft 80 ft 9 5/8 API 5C2
Production liner n/a entire length 160 ft   API 5C2

 

TVDSS conductor = 186 ft

Tail yield = 1.15 cuft/sack

Lead yield = 1.5 cuft/sack

 

In order to calculate conductor tail cement volume we have to use:

1. Annulus volume between diameter of drill bit and outer diameter of conductor casing;

2. Volume of shoe track.

 

Drill bit diameter is not given; however, initial diameter of borehole is usually 36 inches.

 

Volume of conductor tail cement = annulus volume + volume of shoe track =

Except conductor, cementation volume is generally taken from iHandbook software. For surface cementing, annulus volume is 472.65 ft3 and shoe track volume is 76.53 ft3.

Volume of surface tail cement = annulus volume + volume of shoe track + height of conductor

So, volume = 472.65 + 76.53 + 333.74 = 882.92 ft3

Volume of intermediate tail cement = 414.55 ft3, volume of intermediate lead cement = 3125 ft3.

Volume of production tail cement = 189.46 ft3, volume of production lead cement = 3268.67.5 ft3.

Volume of production liner tail cement = 128.47 ft3.

 

 

 

Number of sacks is calculated by dividing the volume to the yield.

Casing Volume of tail, ft3 Volume of lead, ft3 Sack number of tail Sack number of lead
Conductor 560.77      
Surface 882.92      
Intermediate 414.55      
Production 189.46 3268.67    
Production liner 128.47      
Total        

 

Drilling fluids

 

Since there is no problems were reported, drilling fluid for conductor is chosen as water based. It is economically valuable.

Flow of the mud to the aquifer should be prevented by controlling loss of drilling mud. For the surface borehole, water based mud is chosen as well. However, it is not pure water, with different additives (e.g. viscosifiers, fluid loss control).

Reactive shales are present in production borehole. To drill intermediate borehole, main issues could be selected as instability of the borehole and shale reactiveness. Silicate based mud is chosen for this borehole. It is economically valuable as well.

Natural fractured layers are evident in production borehole drilling which arise some problems. Again, water based mud type is essential here.

Production liner indicates good reservoir quality, because of high poroperm values. The drilling fluid flows to formation and cuttings, that’s why it is very important not to damage somehow permeability during the drilling processes. Mud is likely to be oil based.

Mud density values are read from Chart 1.

 

Borehole Mud density (ppg) Mud type
Conductor 8.9 Water based
Surface 8.9 Water based
Intermediate 10.2 Silicate based
Production 15.5 Water based
Production liner 13.9 Oil based

 

 

Shale shakers are used as equipment that removes drilled cuttings from the mud. When the used drilling mud comes to the surface it is directed to the shale shakers where the process begins. Consequently, drilling mud is moved to the mud tanks where the further solids control facilities remove finer solid. These finer solids are eliminated by desander and desilter.

 

 


Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 74 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Dr. L. Jennings| Drilling systems

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.014 сек.)