Читайте также: |
|
The first thing that one has to admit is the great success of the SP. We certainly
have obtained a strong power to manipulate nature. This has changed our daily
lives fundamentally and totally in its technological applications as well as in the
way we look upon and relate to nature.
The first success came with Newton's mechanics. In this theory Newton related
the changes in velocity of the motion, i.e. the accelerations, to the mass of the
particle and to the forces that act upon it. To get hold of these forces was to
harness nature and obtain the power to control her that was Bacon's aim. Thus
we have heard since long that we tame the forces of nature in the SP. It is then
clear how the idea of determinism became of primary importance.
The applications were soon attempted not only to the planetary system and to
ballistics but to all other fields of interest in nature, including physiology, with
varying success. The program of determinism was gradually met with obstacles
and the information needed to pursue it became simply to vast. Some new
principle needed to be introduced. The only one that like determinism does not
appeal to finality or purposes was the notion of chance and randomness. By
definition chance does not contain any reference to aim. Is it then really by
coincidence that two seminal works were published the same year, 1859, using
randomness to model phenomena in nature: Darwin's On the origin of species
and Maxwell's work on the theory of gases? After that the use of chance and
randomness to model physical phenomena was rapidly taken on by Boltzmann in
statistical mechanics, and finally by Heisenberg and Schrodinger in quantum
mechanics. Also the impact on our lives from the elucidation of electromagnetic
phenomena condensed into the so-called Maxwell's equations cannot be
overestimated. This makes part of continuum mechanics, or field theory.
In the 1920s Edwin Hubble, by measuring the spectral lines from distant stellar
objects, discovered that the lines are shifted towards long wave-lengths in the
spectrum: they are red shifted. The red shift increased inversely proportional to
the apparent brightness of the object. According to the psychophysical law of
Fechner and Weber, the brightness is logarithmically related to the luminosity.
Hubble therefore interpreted the red-shift as an effect of a Doppler shift. Distant
stellar objects are moving away from us with a speed proportional to the distance
from us. The conclusion is that the universe is expanding. This has led to the
modern theory of the universe as expanding from a very hot start in the so-called
Big Bang. More and more data seem to support this view and add more details to
the scenario.
Finally elementary particle physics has been introduced to describe the early
phases of the universe, when it was very hot and the particles moved with
velocities even higher than what can be reached in modern particle accelerators.
The merging between elementary particle physics and modern cosmology has
led to attempts to formulate a unified theory of all interactions and all forces: a
Theory of Everything (TOE). This is not the place to discuss the prospects for
such a theory and its possible implications. It suffices to say that it is the ultimate
goal of a fully reductionistic approach to the physical universe.
If we would cartoon the accelerating success during the 20th century it could
go something like this: Due to the SP we have been able to split the atom and its
nucleus, we have been able to tame the nuclear force, we have been able to
transplant hearts, we can manipulate life in its beginning and at its end, we have
put a man on the moon and claim that we know how the expanding universe was
born. We also pretend that we will be able to formulate a theory of everything
(TOE). “Success pyramidal!” The 20th century has truly witnessed a
development unlike anything in known history. We readily have to admit that.
But in being a human project the SP also has other consequences.
Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 46 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
II. Phases in the development of the SP | | | Focus on Grammar Review |