Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Summarized the assessment of the students in the discipline

Introduction. | The results at the end of training. | Criteria and rules of assessment. | The evaluation criteria of independent work of the student |


Читайте также:
  1. Criteria and rules of assessment.
  2. Read ten top tips for research students and be ready to do the task after it.
  3. The assessment of health hazard of the bioptron therapy.
  4. The origins of the discipline
  5. Warming and the foundation of ecology as discipline
Score alphabetic system Digital equivalent Points Score from the traditional system
А 4,0   fine  
А- 3,67 90-94
В+ 3,33 85-89 good
В 3,0 80-84
В- 2,67 75-79
С+ 2,33 70-74   satisfactorily  
С 2,0 65-69
С- 1,67 60-64
D+ 1,33 55-59
D 1,0 50-54
F   0-49 unsatisfactorily

Criteria for evaluation of knowledge-based ГОСО РК 5.03.06-2006 «Система образования республики Казахстан. Контроль знаний в высших учебных заведениях» от 26.08.2006г.

1. Knowledge, skills and competencies of students in all types of control are determined by estimates point-lettered rating systems that have a proportional relationship.

2 Rated "excellent " corresponds to an A, which has the digital equivalent of 4.0, and the percentage of 95-100% and A-, which has the digital equivalent of 3.67 and percentage of 90-94%.

This assessment is put in when the student has shown an understanding of programming material and did not allow of any errors, inaccuracies, timely and properly completed tasks, showing the original thinking, on time and without errors homework, doing research work independently using additional scientific literature in the study of the discipline, he was able to organize their own program material.

3. "Good" is graded B +, which has the digital equivalent of 3.33 and percentage of 85-89%, B which has the digital equivalent of 3.0, and the percentage of 80-84% and B-, which has the digital equivalent of 2.67 and percentage content of 75-79%

This assessment is put in when the student has mastered the program material is not lower than 75% and is not a gross error in the response, the timely implementation of the task and gave them no fundamental observations performed correctly and on time has passed without major homework comments use additional literature on teacher direction, engaged in research work, made mistakes or unprincipled principal issues that are fixed by the student, was able to organize the program material with the help of the teacher.

4. "Satisfactory" assessment corresponds to the estimate of C +, which has the digital equivalent of 2.33 and percentage of 70-74%, and C, which has the digital equivalent of 2.0, and the percentage of 65-69%, C-, which has the digital equivalent of 1.67 and percentage content of 60-64%, D +, which has the digital equivalent of 1.33 and percentage of 55-59%, and D, which has the digital equivalent of 1.0, and the percentage of 50-54%.

This assessment is put in when the student has mastered the program material is not less than 50%, the performance of tasks needed by the teacher, not been active in research, only limited academic literature, this teacher, had great difficulties in organizing the material.

5. Evaluation of "unsatisfactory" is graded F, which has the digital equivalent of 0, and the percentage of 0-49%.

This assessment is put in when the student found a gap in the knowledge base material under the program, more than half had not mastered the discipline of the program, the responses made ​​fundamental errors, did not fulfill individual tasks contained in the form of current, intermediate and final control, has not completed all the basic literature provided by the program.

 


Дата добавления: 2015-08-03; просмотров: 34 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
The criteria and rules for assessing knowledge| further Reading

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.009 сек.)