The article Tourism development in Kazakhstan was written by Dmitry VERKHOTUROV in 2010. I retrieved it from better.kz database.

Article review 2

The author’s main point that Kazakhstan rich for different landmarks and unbelievable by variety of nature. But in spite of that he suggests that Kazakhstan is having hard times of tourist industry formation after the Soviet Union period, when Kazakhstani culture and history were ignored by the ruling party. Kazakhstani historical monuments had been destroying. The author’s main point that Kazakhstan is in need of support to maintain his history and culture, to create his own tourism industry for make this heritage free for all mankind. Arguments which author use to support the main point connected with Soviet Union period when Kazakhstani territory was the security-guarded, where weapons has been tested and produced, along with mining of natural resources. This soviet image obscured the real country and because of that impression it's difficult to see that the Kazakhstan as original and beautiful place. The next argument to supporting author’s idea connected with Kazakhstan incredible places. There are seven miracles in Kazakhstan, which are petroglyphic drawings of Tamgaly-tas, dombra, nomads tent, Golden man from the grave-mound of Saka tribe, rock mosques of Mangystau, mausoleum of Akhmed Yassaui, and the Astana symbol, built up on the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan initiative — Astana-Baiterek. Except the miracles it worth to see the mausoleum of the older Genghis Khan's son — Dzhuchi, to visit Alma-Arasan's hot springs situated near the Almaty city, to attend the mountains and lakes of Bayan-aul national nature park, Borovoe resort, to climb up Chimbulak ski resort and to look at the other places of interest. In my point of view article is logical, becase here we can see a chronological order, and for that reason article easy for reading. However in that article we can see author’s negative attitude on influence Soviet Union to Kazakhstan, but in spite of that he based his attitude on history, for that reason I can say that author's facts accurate. This article a little bit influenced on my mind and I understood my subject better. Because before reading this article I didn’t think about Soviet Union, I didn’t think that it ruined Kazakhstani tourism. Also sentence which strong response for me is “ Before that it was the security-guarded territory, where weapons has been tested and produced, along with mining of natural resources. This soviet image obscured the real country.” This sentence we can find at the beginning of article because of that when I only begun to read that text it changed my mind. After reading this article I understood that we should reestablish our culture and reconstruct a lot of national monuments for tourists attracting.

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14