Читайте также:
|
|
The sentence is produced by the speaker in the process of speech as a concrete, ituationally bound utterance
But the sentence is not the highest unit of language in the hierarchy of levels. Above the proposemic level there is still another one, namely, the level of sentence-groups, "supra-sentential constructions".
this level can be called "supra-proposemic".
The supra-sentential construction is a combination of separate sentences forming a textual unity.
The syntactic process by which sentences are connected into textual unities is analysed under the heading of "cumulation".
In the typed text, the supra-sentential construction commonly coincides with the paragraph
So, there are six levels of language, each identified by its own functional type of segmental units.
7 THE NOTION OF A MORPHEME / TYPES OF MORPHEMES
the morpheme is a smallest meaningful component of the word; it is elementary
is formed by phonemes; is general, ideal
morphemes on the upper level are divided into
root-morphemes (roots) and
affixal morphemes (affixes).
The roots express the concrete, "material" part of the meaning of the word,
while the affixes express the specificational part of the meaning of the word
The roots of notional words are classical lexical morphemes.
The affixal morphemes include prefixes, suffixes, and inflexions
prefixes and suffixes have word-building functions, together with the root they form the stem of the word;
inflexions (grammatical suffixes) express different morphological categories.
The root is obligatory for any word, while affixes are not obligatory
out — a root-word
throughout — a composite word, in which -out serves as one of the roots
outing — a two-morpheme word, in which out is a root, and -ing is a suffix;
outlook, outline, outrage — words, in which out- serves as a prefix;
look-out, knock-out, time-out, — words (nouns), in which -out serves as a suffix.
the abstract complete morphemic model of the common English word is the following: prefix + root + suffix + inflection.
Each word has its morphemic composition.
we can find the morpheme only within the structure of a word.
2 criteria of a classification of a morpheme (traditional)
Positional | Semantic | |
Takes into account the position of a morpheme within a word | Morphemes contributes into general semantics of a word | |
Morphemes are represented by Morphs Root morphemes and affixal morphemes | ||
Central morpheme | Prefixes Suffixes Grammatical suffixes (inflections) WB functions | |
Allo-emic theory – theory of descriptive linguistics – helps identify semantic properties of lingual units
1. differentiates imunits and allounits
general concrete
abstract real
deals with the identification of lingual units with the help of distributional analysis. (how the units are distributed?)
Types of distribution:
Contrastive | Non-contrastive | Complementary | |
Contrast | No contrast at all | Shows 1 gram meaning through different morphs | |
Listen ed – listen ing | Learned – learnt | Listen – listening | |
Phonological | morphological |
Allo-emic theory classifies morphemes distributionaly according to:
Degree of self dependence - free / bound
Formal presentation explicit / implicit
Grammatical alternation additive / replacive
Linear characteristics continuous / discontinuous
1. morpheme is classified on the basis of a degree of self-dependence:
free – capable of making words by themselves (free, root morphemes)
bound – affixal morphemes, never occur in isolation.
(hand root/ full affix )
2. basis of a formal presentation: whether we can see or not
explicit
implicit (comeexplicit [0] implicit – come explicit s explicit)
3. the basis of grammatical alternation:
additive - edited to the stem of the word
replacive - one root is replaced by another root
(drive, drove, driven), (woman – women)
(clock – clock[ s ] – additive)
4. basis of linear characteristics:
continuous - uninterrupted
discontinuous – interrupted (have been doing – 1 morpheme (3 constituents))
(She has been writing – discontinuous this article for a number of years)
NOUN:
The category of gender is expressed in English by the obligatory correlation of nouns with the personal pronouns of the third person.
The category of gender is strictly oppositional.
It is formed by two oppositions
One opposition functions in the whole set of nouns, dividing them into person (human) nouns and non-person (non-human) nouns.
The other opposition functions in the subset of person nouns only, dividing them into masculine nouns and feminine nouns.
As a result of the double oppositional correlation, a specific system of three genders arises, which is misleadingly represented by the
traditional terminology: the neuter gender, the masculine gender, the feminine gender.
The strong member of the upper opposition is the human subclass of nouns
The weak member of the opposition both inanimate and animate non-person nouns. Here belong such nouns as tree, mountain, love,cat, society, crowd, association, bull and cow,
The strong member of the opposition is the feminine subclass of person nouns,
Here belong such nouns as woman, girl, mother, bride
The masculine subclass of person nouns - such words as man, boy, father,
makes up the weak member of the opposition.
A great many person nouns in English are capable of expressing both feminine and masculine person genders by way of the pronominal correlation in question. These are referred to as nouns of the " common gender ". Here belong such words as person, parent, friend, cousin, doctor,
president, etc.
nouns can show the sex of their referents lexically,
boy-friend, girl-friend, washer-man, landlady; he-bear, she-bear; master
, mistress; actor, actress; executor, executrix;
the category of gender is semantic, meaningful
it reflects the actual features of the named objects.
The category of number is expressed by the opposition of the plural form of the noun to the singular form of the noun. The strong member of this binary opposition is the plural, its productive formal mark being the suffix -(e)s
dog — dogs, clock — clocks, box — boxes. The productive formal mark correlates with the absence of the number suffix in the singular form of the noun
The other, non-productive ways of expressing
the number opposition are vowel interchange
(man — men, woman — women, tooth — teeth,
the archaic suffix -(e)n supported by phonemic interchange
(ox — oxen, child — children,
the correlation of individual singular and plural suffixes in a limited number of borrowed nouns (formula — formulae, phenomenon — phenomena, alumnus — alumni,
In some cases the plural form of the noun is homonymous with the singular form (sheep, deer, fish
there exist plurals and singulars that cannot be fully accounted for by the above ready-made approach.
Lecture 5
the Verb, complexity and categorial specifics
1. the verb: situation and reality
categorial meaning
functional value
forms of WB
classes of verbs
2. notional verbs traditional classification lexical (according to semantics)
types of categorization
verbs combining power – valency
the synt valency
3. verbals
finite and non finite
the verbals paradigm
1. the verb: situation and reality
THE CATEGORY OF FINITUDE
Verbs categorial meaning – process developing in time
Finite (personal form) | Non-finite (impersonal) |
Agree with the person and number Plays a central role in the predication of a sentence, makes up the primary predication | Don’t agree Are very specific Subject is implied Form additional secondary predication 4 types – Infinitive – verbal name of process Gerund – verbal name of process close to N, capable of performing all the possible sentence parts functions Participle1 and Participle2 – qualifying names of process Functions of V, Adv, adj APC, P1C and P2C |
WB specifics:
1. simple (go, take, try, sing)
2. sound replacive (blood-bleed, food-feed)
3. stress replacive (export – to export)
4. composite (blackmail – to blackmail)
5. expanded (normal – normalize)
Linear characteristics:
--- continuous / discontinuous
--- full nominative value – notional verbs / partial nominative value – semi notional verbs
functional
--- perceptional (seem, look)
--- factual (to become, to grow) --- linking verbs - Linking function
combining power – valency
Obligatory | Optional | ||
V+N Having a complete structure | V+N in the function of the direct object (she wrote a letter of application) | ||
Complementive | Supplementive | ||
Usage of direct object | |||
Personal | Impersonal | ||
Verbs categories – study!
Smirnitskyj classifications of direct and indirect moods (binary privative opposition)
2 direct 4 indirect – subj 1,2 the suppositional mood and the conditional mood
Verb potential semantics – durative,
verbs - lexical, primary and modal
notional and semi-notional
approaches to classify the notional verbs: LEXICAL - 7 demains
activity (contact,) – denote actions and events; subject role – agent
transitive / intransitive
communication – a subcategory of activity verbs (ask, announce, call, explain)
mental (co gnitive) - range of activities and states (think, know, taste, consider, learn, enjoy)
simple occurance – simple events (become, change, grow)
causative – (allow, help, permit)
aspectual – (begin, continue, start, stop)
of existence and relational – reporting a state (seem, appear)
depends on a meaning can be in both categories
whether commun verbs can be autonomous?
the verb tense aspect voice mood peculiarities
1.expression of grammatical time
· time denotation
· types of time naming
· the gramm expression of verbal time
2. the verb aspective meaning (continuous / non-continuous)
· aspective grammatical change
· the category of development
· the category of retrospective coordination
3. the verbal category of voice
· the opposition “active-passive”
· “medial” voices:
· reflexive
· reciprocal
· middle
4.the category of mood
· oblique mood meaning
· direct mood meaning
· direct moods:
· the indicative
· the imperative
· oblique (indirect moods):
· subjunctive 1
· subjunctive 2
· the suppositional
· the conditional
phrase types and relevance of syntagmatic connection
1. variety of word groupings
· properties of different combinations
· contextual dependence
· contextually self-dependent value
2. properties of word groupings
· equal rank relations
· unequal relations
3. types of connections in groupings
· syndetic / asyndetic
· logically consecutive connections
· inner cumulation
· predicative connection of words
· completive connections (objective, qualifying)
direction of linking - bydirectional and monodirectional phrases
autosemantic potential – self dependent phrases
sinsemantic - non self dependent
the rank of relationship:
equal rank relations
unequal rank relations
sentence as the integral language unit
1. the sentence as the main object of syntax
· basic approaches to the definition
· external – generalization; language – sentence – thought
· functional design; sentence - communicative whole
· internal – complexity; unity of formal and semantic characteristics
· syntactic / predicative/ basic communicative level unit;
· main syntactic form
· traditional classification of the sentence
· declarative
· interrogative
· imperative
· classification of utterances according to Charles Fries
· sentence – a minimum isolated utterance.
· situation utterance:
· alicit action response
· alicit obligatory response
· statements
· sentence vs word
· sentence – utterance as correlatives
· categorial specifics of the sentence
· predication
· modality
· intonation
2. the simple sentence/ semantic classification
· categorial meanings of:
· subject
· predicate
· subject-object relation
3. The composite sentence:
· types of construction:
· parataxis
· hypotaxis
· structural relationship between clauses:
· elaboration
· extension
· enhancement
THE SENTENCE LOGICO-SEMANTIC CHARACTERIZATION
1. the sentence as a polyaspective entity:
· nomination specifics – nomination role of sentence parts
· semantic – semantic
· information – information
· semantic roles (actants):
· agent, patient, experience, beneficient, instrument, participant, result
2. the theory of actual division
· nominative division VS actual division – specifics of the correlation
· V.Mathesius conception of “known and unknown”
· logical analysis of the proposition
· theme and rheme as the main components of the actual – formal means of
· distinction
· the “logical accent” = the rhematic accent
· the actual division as part of syntactic predication
3. communicative sentence types and the theory of actual division
· the declarative sentence actual devision
· the inperative sentence “theme-rheme” specifis
· the interrogative sentence “communicative perspective”
Дата добавления: 2015-11-16; просмотров: 398 | Нарушение авторских прав
<== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
Paradigmatic relations coexist with syntagmatic relations in such a way that some sort of syntagmatic connection is necessary for the realisation of any paradigmatic series. | | | Open the brackets putting the verbs in the Past Simple or the Past Continuous tense-forms. |