|
Читайте также: |
The purpose of this part is to help you to understand much that for the first time you will meet in this book. All this is introduced in so brief form that to repeat these concepts and definitions once again or to result them here repeatedly is not meaningful. Excuse us, but we need to offer you to be acquainted with the content of this section in the beginning of the book.
1. Is “nuclear” electric power really the cheapest?
How much does the construction of a NPP cost?
One gets the impression, that the more the reactor is perfect, the more it is complex, and, hence, the more it is expensive, the more is the danger of it falling out of action. Simply magic cycle!
The «Financial Times” (1996г.) asserts, “a Gas power station with capacity of 1000 MW costs today 400 million pounds sterling (670 million US dollars), and it can be constructed in two years time. A NPP of the same capacity will cost from two or three billion pounds sterling (3,4 – 5,0 billion dollars) and will need eight years for its construction.
Military interest enabled to write off a large part of charges on construction of atomic reactors, on their end - product - nuclear explosive. Cost of “peace” atomic objects was essentially underestimated. In addition, those who did not know it, that are you, thought, that all this very «peace» and we and very cheap.
On minimum cost assessments construction of only one unit of the nuclear power plant with the capacity in 1000 MW with all necessary infrastructure will cost to Belarus 4,5-6 billion US dollars. Construction of the second unit of the nuclear power plant of the same capacity will demand 3-5 billion US dollars more.
Why terms of construction of NPP are tightened
On the basis of statistical data of IAEA for already commissioned NPP terms of construction in the advanced states make 7-11 years, in less developed countries (Argentina, Brazil, India, Mexico, Romania) – 13-15 years
You are not yet familiar with this combination of letters IAEA? Then we shall decipher it. It is – the International Agency on the Atomic Energy. The headquarter of this organization is in the capital of Austria, in the country which has no NPP. To tell the truth, the interesting moment? And so, this organization knows all atomic energy of the world. It is obviously interested in development of this area of power. And if it is necessary for them to recognize something, in it they can be trusted.
Thus, for 1998 average planned term of construction of 10 from 26 built reactors has made more than 16 years, and on the rest 16 reactors, even for IAEA, terms of planned end are not known.
Construction of NPP in Belarus will lead to freezing at least 4,5-6 billion US dollars not less than for 12-15 years, that money will be annually put in capital construction and will start to give feedback only in 12 years. It is fraught with long-term paralysis of the national economy, failure of all programs of energy efficient re-equipment of the industry, including the power, full stagnation in the field of renewed power, and energy saving.
Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 37 | Нарушение авторских прав
| <== предыдущая страница | | | следующая страница ==> |
| Introduction. | | | About safety of NPP. |