Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатика
ИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханика
ОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторика
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансы
ХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Table Manners

Читайте также:
  1. Figure 1) Table 1: Listed Grain-Producing Companies of Ukraine, 2011
  2. Figure 2) Table 2: Market Shares of TOP-5 Grain Exporters of Ukraine, 2010/2011 – 2011/2012MY
  3. Figure 2) Table 2: Market Shares of TOP-5 Grain Exporters of Ukraine, 2010/2011 – 2011/2012MY
  4. The Good, the Bad and the Uncomfortable
  5. ТTable жиынының ерекшеліктері

English table manners, across all classes, have deteriorated somewhat but are still, as Mikes acknowledges, fairly decent. The genuinely important aspects of eating etiquette – showing consideration for others; not being selfish or greedy; general fairness, politeness and sociability – are known to, if not always strictly observed by, most English people of all social classes. No class has a monopoly on either good or bad eating behaviour.

Although proper �family meals’ may nowadays occur on average only once a week, rather than every day, most English children of all classes are still brought up to say please and thank you when asking for food and being given food, and most adults are also reasonably polite. We all know that we should ask for things rather than just grabbing them; not serve ourselves huge helpings leaving insufficient food for the others; wait until everyone has been served before starting to eat, unless urged to �please start, or it will go cold’; not take the last piece of anything without asking if anyone else wants it; not talk with our mouths full; not cram vast, unsightly amounts of food into our mouths or masticate noisily; take part in the conversation without monopolizing or dominating it; and so on.

When eating at a restaurant, we know that in addition to the above we should be polite to the waiters and, in particular, never, ever try to summon a waiter by snapping our fingers or bellowing across the room. The correct procedure is to lean back in your chair with an expectant look, endeavour to make eye contact, then perform a quick eyebrow-lift/chin-lift. Raising a hand is permissible, as is a quiet �Excuse me?’ if the waiter is nearby and has not noticed you, but this should not be done in an imperious manner. We know that orders should be phrased as requests, with the usual full complement of pleases and thank-yous. We know that it is unseemly to make a fuss or a scene or in any way draw attention to oneself when eating in public. Making any sort of fuss about money is especially distasteful, and ostentatious displays of wealth are as bad as conspicuous meanness. People who insist on calculating in detail exactly who had what when it comes to dividing up the bill are despised, not just because they are miserly, but because such discussions involve a prolonged breach of the money-talk taboo.

We may not always abide by all of these codes, but we know the rules. If you ask English people about �table manners’, they may assume that you mean prissy, pointless etiquette about which fork to use, but if you start a conversation about what is and isn’t acceptable when eating with other people, what they were taught and what they teach their children, these rather more basic, universal, classless courtesies will emerge. Many of them, if you look closely, are essentially about that perennial English preoccupation: fairness.

Lower-class mothers – particularly �respectable upper-working’ and lower-middle mothers – tend to be, if anything, more strict on these basic points than some middle-middle and upper-middle parents, who are still unduly influenced by the supposedly �progressive’ child-rearing methods of the 1970s, which frowned upon rules and regulations, and encouraged unfettered self-expression. I say �parents’ rather than just �mothers’ in this case, as the middles and upper-middles tend to be more role-reversed than the other classes, with fathers more involved in the social education of their children.

Those at the top of the social scale, as so often seems to be the case, have more in common with the working classes than with the middle ranks: upper-class mothers tend to be quite strict on basic good eating manners, although upper-class men do not necessarily practise what their wives and nannies preach to their children. Some aristocratic males are notorious for their appalling table manners, in this trait resembling some lower-working/underclass males, who also do not care about other people’s opinion of them.

But these are just minor and patchy variations: on the whole, the basic-courtesy rules are fairly classless. It is only when you look beyond these essential courtesies that the significant class divisions start to appear. The more arcane, esoteric rules of table etiquette – the peas-on-the-back-of-the-fork minutiae for which the English are famous and widely ridiculed – tend to be the preserve of the higher social classes. Indeed, one could be forgiven for suspecting that the only function of such rules is to distinguish these classes from the lower ones, as in most cases it is hard to see what other purpose they might serve.


Дата добавления: 2015-09-06; просмотров: 122 | Нарушение авторских прав


Читайте в этой же книге: The Monday-morning Moan 8 страница | DRESS CODES AND ENGLISHNESS | FOOD RULES | THE AMBIVALENCE RULE | TV-DINNER RULES | THE NOVELTY RULE | The вЂ?Typical!’ Rule Revisited | CULINARY CLASS CODES | The Health-correctness Indicator | Lunch/Dinner Rules |
<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Breakfast Rules – and Tea Beliefs| Forks and the Pea-eating Rules

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.007 сек.)