Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатика
ИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханика
ОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторика
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансы
ХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

But what about the relevance of the terms “ethnicity” and “race”?

Читайте также:
  1. A. What about the Crusades?
  2. About SIAM 2003
  3. About the Built-In Templates
  4. About the General Template
  5. About the IEEE
  6. About the Petroleum Template

 

Ethnicity has always played a significant factor in every single conflict, and I believe it will in the future as well whether we like it or not. Just look at Iraq. It’s a text book example of ethnic war - Kurds vs. Sunni Arabs vs Persian Shias. Turkey: Turks vs Kurds etc. It’s not a secret that ethnicity is closely linked to culture in a majority of countries worldwide.

 

In fact, Islam is one of the most racist political ideologies in the world. Usually when a society has been 90%+ Islamised the Arabisation process begins with often financial support from Saudi and other Arab countries. This is the case in Mauritania and several African countries. Systematic "Arabisation" efforts are being ignored by western media and academia which on the other hand are blindly obsessed with implementing multiculturalism.

 

In Europe today, where a majority of individuals have been a victim of institutionalised multiculturalist indoctrination for several decades it’s essential that we exercise rhetorical containment. Not with the intention of appeasing the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists but rather with the intention of protecting ourselves from the mine field which is cultural conservatism. The cultural Marxists/multiculturalists WANT us to use "flagged" rhetoric as it will make it very easy for them to label us as bigots.

 

I don’t think individuals who use ”flagged rhetoric” understands the concepts of "reputational shields". In fact, I very much doubt they have studied modern right wing rhetorical strategies which is extremely important to individuals as well as for political parties. It is not the message itself but rather the credibility of the actor who delivers it that makes the crucial difference. An individual using "flagged" rhetoric such as "race", race war", white people, black people, Jews (in the same sentence as race f example), ethnic (in the same sentence as Jews) - are triggering every imaginable mine put up for him which in turn will completely obliterate his ”reputational shield” (if he ever had one). Therefore he is not only undermining his own efforts, but he risks pushing other ”moderate conservatives” away. They might distance themselves as it might affect their individual "reputational shields" by being affiliated with flagged individuals.

 

So even though ethnicity and race still is relevant, it is not in our best interest to talk about it. If we do, we are only increasing the risk of destroying our own credibility which is lethal for individuals aspiring to reach a large audience (politicians etc). This will undermine and limit the impact and distribution of their future messages (which is the case with BNP and National Front to a certain degree).

 

As Muhammad once said: War is Deceit (al-Taqiyya). Many Muslims are masters of deceit, and it’s time we start adapting to these realities as well.

 

Cultural Communism is one of the most deceitful ideologies out there (next to Islam). It’s a deceitful, racist, fascist, hate ideology bent on the eradication of Christianity and Western Culture.

 

Multiculturalism has never been about tolerance. It is an anti-Western hate ideology championed as an instrument for unilaterally dismantling European culture. As such, it is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication, and we, the peoples of Europe, have not just a right, but a duty to resist it.

 

The key is preserving our reputational shields using strategic rhetoric.

 

 


Дата добавления: 2015-07-17; просмотров: 119 | Нарушение авторских прав


Читайте в этой же книге: Give the Nobel Peace Prize to Ayaan Hirsi Ali | Nobel Peace Prize Awarded for Appeasement of Jihad… again | Green is the new Red - Stop Enviro-Communism! | Consolidating the moderate cultural conservative forces of Europe | Learning from cultural Marxists/multiculturalists | Convince Europeans we're trustworthy to lead | Invest in creating elite tacticians | Copying Marxist organisational strategies and networks – locally, nationally and internationally | Public opposition to Islamisation translated into success for political parties | Cultural conservative/nationalist rhetorical strategies |
<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Preserving your reputation shields to achieve maximum penetration/ influence towards all target groups| Tactical approach - European vs. white, victimhood vs. supremacy

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.005 сек.)