Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

1. Assumptions in economics.



Topics for reports

 

Workshop 1 (December 6)

1. Assumptions in economics.

 

Røgeberg O., Nordberg M. A defence of absurd theories in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 12:4, 543–562 December 2005.

Samuels W. J. Deduction and the practice of economics: the necessity of a sense of limits. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 99–104 2001.

Lagueux M. Freidman’s “Instrumentalism” and Constructive Empiricism in Economics. Theory and Decision 37: 147-174, 1994.

Boumans M., Morgan M. S. Ceteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 11–26 2001. (Ceteris paribus and realisticity of theory, mathematization, thought and lab experiments, econometrics)

Vanberg V.J. The rationality postulate in economics: its ambiguity, its deficiency and its evolutionary alternative. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 1–29 March 2004.

Lagueux M. The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 31–51 March 2004.

Howson, Susan. The Origins of Lionel Robbins’s Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p413-443.

 

2. Problems of deductivism

Samuels W. J. Deduction and the practice of economics: the necessity of a sense of limits. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 99–104 2001. (когда дедукция позволяет получить истинные выводы)

Teixeira P.N. Great expectations, mixed results and resilient beliefs: the troubles of empirical research in economic controversies. Journal of Economic Methodology 14:3, 291–309 September 2007

Boumans M., Morgan M. S. Ceteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 11–26 2001. (Ceteris paribus and realisticity of theory, mathematization, thought and lab experiments, econometrics)

Lipsey R.G. Successes and failures in the transformation of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:2, 169–201 2001.

Vanberg V.J. The rationality postulate in economics: its ambiguity, its deficiency and its evolutionary alternative. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 1–29 March 2004.

Lagueux M. The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 31–51 March 2004.

Depoortère, Christophe. On Ricardo’s Method: The Scottish Connection Considered. History of Political Economy, Spring2008, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p73-110.

Charles, Loic. The Tableau Economique as Rational Recreation. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p445-474.

 

3. Economic data and economics

 

Mayer T. Data mining: a reconsideration. Journal of Economic Methodology 7:2, 183–194 2000.

Greene C.A. I am not, nor have I ever been a member of a data-mining discipline. Journal of Economic Methodology 7:2, 217–230 2000.

Teixeira P.N. Great expectations, mixed results and resilient beliefs: the troubles of empirical research in economic controversies. Journal of Economic Methodology 14:3, 291–309 September 2007

Lagueux M. Freidman’s “Instrumentalism” and Constructive Empiricism in Economics. Theory and Decision 37: 147-174, 1994.

Mäki U. Models are experiments, experiments are models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12:2, 303–315 June 2005.

Lipsey R.G. Successes and failures in the transformation of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:2, 169–201 2001.

Lie, Einar. The “Protestant” View: The Norwegian and Scandinavian Approach to National Accounting in the Postwar Period. History of Political Economy, Winter2007, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p713-734.

 

4. Problems of the empirical testing in economics

 

Teixeira P.N. Great expectations, mixed results and resilient beliefs: the troubles of empirical research in economic controversies. Journal of Economic Methodology 14:3, 291–309 September 2007

Lagueux M. Freidman’s “Instrumentalism” and Constructive Empiricism in Economics. Theory and Decision 37: 147-174, 1994.

Mäki U. Models are experiments, experiments are models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12:2, 303–315 June 2005.



Boumans M., Morgan M. S. Ceteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 11–26 2001. (Ceteris paribus and realisticity of theory, mathematization, thought and lab experiments, econometrics)

Lipsey R.G. Successes and failures in the transformation of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:2, 169–201 2001.

Depoortère, Christophe. On Ricardo’s Method: The Scottish Connection Considered. History of Political Economy, Spring2008, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p73-110.

Charles, Loic. The Tableau Economique as Rational Recreation. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p445-474.

 

5. Experiments in economics

 

Mäki U. Models are experiments, experiments are models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12:2, 303–315 June 2005.

Boumans M., Morgan M. S. Ceteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 11–26 2001. (Ceteris paribus and realisticity of theory, mathematization, thought and lab experiments, econometrics)

 

 

Workshop 2 (Dec.13)

 

6. The role of models in economics

 

Mäki U. Models are experiments, experiments are models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12:2, 303–315 June 2005.

Lagueux M. The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 31–51 March 2004.

Depoortère, Christophe. On Ricardo’s Method: The Scottish Connection Considered. History of Political Economy, Spring2008, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p73-110.

Colander, David. The Strange Persistence of the IS-LM Model. History of Political Economy, 2004 Supplement, Vol. 36, p305-322.

Charles, Loic. The Tableau Economique as Rational Recreation. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p445-474.

Comim, Flavio. The Common Sense of Political Economy of PhilipWicksteed. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p475-495.

 

7. Economics and natural sciences

 

Le Gall, Philippe. The Confessions of the Average: Statistics and Natural Order in Nineteenth-Century French Economic Thought. History of Political Economy, Fall2008, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p447-480.

Charles, Loic. The Tableau Economique as Rational Recreation. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p445-474.

Schabas, Margaret; De Marchi, Neil. Introduction to Oeconomies in the Age of Newton. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p1-13.

Riskin, Jessica. The “Spirit of System” and the Fortunes of Physiocracy. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p42-73.

Christensen, Paul P. Epicurean and Stoic Sources for Boisguilbert’s Physiological and Hippocratic Vision of Nature and Economics. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p101-128.

Caffentzis, C. George. Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Lock and Berkley. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p204-233.

Wennerlind, Carl. Credit-Money as the Philosopher’s Stone: Alchemy and the Coinage Problem in Seventeenth Century England. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p234-261.

Schabas, Margaret. Adam Smith’s Debts to Nature. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p262-281.

 

 

8. Normative issues in economic theory

 

Samuels W.J. A Necessary Normative Context of Positive Economics? Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XV. No. 3. Sept. 1981.

Sassower, Raphael. Ideology Masked as Science: Shielding Economics from Criticism. // J. of Economic Issues, Vol. 22. Issue 1. March 1988. P. 167-179

Schumpeter J. A. Science and Ideology. The American Economic Review. 1949. Vol. 39. Issue 2. P. 345-359.

Elster, Jon. Social Norms and Economic Theory. // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 3. Issue 4. Fall 1989. P. 99-117.

McKenzie R.B. the Necessary Normative Context of Positive Economics. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XV. No. 3. Sept. 1981.

Plessner, Yakir; Young, Warren. Economists, Government, and Economic Policymaking in Israel: From “Crawling Peg” to “Cold Turkey” History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p292-313.

Almodovar, António; Cardoso, José Luís. Corporatism and the Economic Role of Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p333-354.

Langholm, Odd. Buridan on Value and Economic Measurement. History of Political Economy, Summer2006, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p269-289.

Comim, Flavio. The Common Sense of Political Economy of PhilipWicksteed. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p475-495.

Barnett, Vincent. Tugan-Baranovsky, the Methodology of Political Economy, and the “Russian Historical School”. History of Political Economy, Spring2004, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p79-101.

 

 

9. Mathematization of Economics

 

Schabas M. Alfred Marshall, W. Stanley Jevons, and the Mathematization of Economics. Isis. Vol. 80. No. 1. March 1989.

Spengler J. J. On the Progress of Quantification in Economics. Isis. Vol. 52. No. 2. June 1961.

Hill L.E. the Use and Abuse of Mathematics in Economics. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, Apr66, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p212-214.

Le Gall, Philippe. The Confessions of the Average: Statistics and Natural Order in Nineteenth-Century French Economic Thought. History of Political Economy, Fall2008, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p447-480.

Comim, Flavio. The Common Sense of Political Economy of PhilipWicksteed. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p475-495.

Sylla, Edith Dudley. Business Ethics, Commercial Mathematics, and the Origins of the Mathematical Probability. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p309-337.

 

10. Instrumentalism in economics.

 

Lagueux M. Freidman’s “Instrumentalism” and Constructive Empiricism in Economics. Theory and Decision 37: 147-174, 1994.

Boumans M., Morgan M. S. Ceteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 11–26 2001. (Ceteris paribus and realisticity of theory, mathematization, thought and lab experiments, econometrics)

Lagueux M. The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 31–51 March 2004.

Bunge M. Realism and antirealism in social science. Theory and Decision 35: 207-235, 1993.

Frazer W. J., and Boland L.A. An Essay on the Foundations of Friedman’s Methodology. The American Economic Review. Vol. 73. No. 1. March 1983.

 

Workshop 3 (Dec. 20)

 

11. Sociological aspects of economic knowledge

 

Frey B.S Why economists disregard economic methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 41–47 2001 (движущие стимулы экономистов, влияние публикаций и рецензирования на развитие эк. науки)

Angner E. Economists as experts: Overconfidence in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Methodology 13:1, 1–24 March 2006.

 

12. The rhetoric approach in economics

 

Denis A. Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:3, 341–357 September 2004.

Klamer A. Making sense of economists: from falsification to rhetoric and beyond. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 69–75 2001.

Charles, Loic. The Tableau Economique as Rational Recreation. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p445-474.

Caffentzis, C. George. Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Lock and Berkley. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p204-233.

 

13. Communication and economics

 

Mayer T. Improving communication in economics: a task for methodologists. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 77–84 2001.

Frey B.S Why economists disregard economic methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 41–47 2001

Angner E. Economists as experts: Overconfidence in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Methodology 13:1, 1–24 March 2006.

Denis A. Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:3, 341–357 September 2004.

Marciano, Alain. Benevolence, Sympathy, and Hume’s Model of Government: How Different is New Political Economy from Classical Political Economy? History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p43-70.

 

14. Methodological individualism in economics

 

Hodgson G. M. Meanings of methodological individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 14:2, 211–226 June 2007

Lagueux M. The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 31–51 March 2004.

Bunge M. Realism and antirealism in social science. Theory and Decision 35: 207-235, 1993.

Agassi J. Methodological Individualism. The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 11. N. 3. Sept. 1960.

 

15. The economic model of government

 

Marciano, Alain. Benevolence, Sympathy, and Hume’s Model of Government: How Different is New Political Economy from Classical Political Economy? History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p43-70.

Farrant, Andrew; Paganelli, Maria Pia. Are Two Knaves Better Than One? Hume, Buchanan, and Musgrave on Economics and Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p71-90

Young, Jeffrey T. Unintended Order and Intervention: Adam Smith’s Theory of the Role of the State. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p91-119.

Bateman, Bradley W. Bringing in the State? The Life and Times of Laissez-Faire in the Nineteenth-Century United States. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p175-199.

Rutherford, Malcolm. Walton H. Hamilton and the Public Control of Business History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p234-273.

Plessner, Yakir; Young, Warren. Economists, Government, and Economic Policymaking in Israel: From “Crawling Peg” to “Cold Turkey” History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p292-313.

Medema, Steven G. The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure. History of Political Economy, Fall2007, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p331-358.

 

16. The concept of economic man

 

Marciano, Alain. Benevolence, Sympathy, and Hume’s Model of Government: How Different is New Political Economy from Classical Political Economy? History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p43-70.

Farrant, Andrew; Paganelli, Maria Pia. Are Two Knaves Better Than One? Hume, Buchanan, and Musgrave on Economics and Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p71-90

Almodovar, António; Cardoso, José Luís. Corporatism and the Economic Role of Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p333-354.

Paganelli, Maria Pia. The Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments. History of Political Economy, Summer2008, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p365-382.

Fontaine, Philippe. From Philanthropy to Altruism: Incorporating Unselfish Behavior into Economics, 1961–1975. History of Political Economy, Spring2007, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p1-46.

Evensky, Jerry. “Chicago Smith” versus “Kirkaldy Smith”. History of Political Economy, Summer2005, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p197-203.

Howson, Susan. The Origins of Lionel Robbins’s Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p413-443.

Comim, Flavio. The Common Sense of Political Economy of PhilipWicksteed. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p475-495.

 

17. The Political Economy of Laissez Faire

 

Hill L.E. On Laissez-faire Capitalism and “Liberalism”. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, Oct64, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p393-396

Waller W. The Political Economy of Laissez-Faire. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XL. No. 1. March 2006.

Marciano, Alain. Benevolence, Sympathy, and Hume’s Model of Government: How Different is New Political Economy from Classical Political Economy? History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p43-70.

Farrant, Andrew; Paganelli, Maria Pia. Are Two Knaves Better Than One? Hume, Buchanan, and Musgrave on Economics and Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p71-90

Young, Jeffrey T. Unintended Order and Intervention: Adam Smith’s Theory of the Role of the State. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p91-119.

Bateman, Bradley W. Bringing in the State? The Life and Times of Laissez-Faire in the Nineteenth-Century United States. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p175-199.

Rutherford, Malcolm. Walton H. Hamilton and the Public Control of Business History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p234-273.

Almodovar, António; Cardoso, José Luís. Corporatism and the Economic Role of Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p333-354.

Backhouse, Roger E. The Rise of Free Market Economics: Economists and the Role of the State since 1970. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p355-392.

Prendergast, Renee. Knowledge and Information in Economics: What Did the Classical Economists Know? History of Political Economy, Winter2007, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p679-712.

Medema, Steven G. The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure. History of Political Economy, Fall2007, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p331-358.

Howson, Susan. The Origins of Lionel Robbins’s Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p413-443.

Farrant, Andrew. Frank Knight,Worst-Case Theorizing, and Economic Planning: Socialism as Monopoly Politics. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p497-504.

 

Workshop 4 (Dec. 27)

 

 

18. Methodology of Keynesian approach in economics

 

Chick V. Theory, method and mode of thought in Keynes’s General Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 10:3, 307–327 September.

Lipsey R.G. Successes and failures in the transformation of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:2, 169–201 2001.

Almodovar, António; Cardoso, José Luís. Corporatism and the Economic Role of Government. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p333-354.

Colander, David. The Strange Persistence of the IS-LM Model. History of Political Economy, 2004 Supplement, Vol. 36, p305-322.

 

19. Methodology of Neoclassical economics

 

Backhouse R.E. History and equilibrium: A partial defense of equilibrium economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:3, 291–305 September 2004.

Lagueux M. The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11:1, 31–51 March 2004.

Dugger W.M. Methodological Differences between Institutional and Neoclassical Economics. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XIII. No.4. Dec. 1979.

Backhouse, Roger E. The Rise of Free Market Economics: Economists and the Role of the State since 1970. History of Political Economy, 2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, p355-392.

Medema, Steven G. The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure. History of Political Economy, Fall2007, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p331-358.

Fontaine, Philippe. From Philanthropy to Altruism: Incorporating Unselfish Behavior into Economics, 1961–1975. History of Political Economy, Spring2007, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p1-46.

Howson, Susan. The Origins of Lionel Robbins’s Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p413-443.

Comim, Flavio. The Common Sense of Political Economy of PhilipWicksteed. History of Political Economy, Fall2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p475-495.

 

20. Methodology in new institutional economics

Menard C. Methodological issues in new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 8:1, 85–92 2001.

May A.M., Sellers J.R. Contemporary Philosophy of Science and Neoinstitutional Thought. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XXII, No. 2. June 1988.

Dugger W.M. Methodological Differences between Institutional and Neoclassical Economics. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XIII. No.4. Dec. 1979.

 

 

21. The Methodology of Classical economic thought

 

Le Gall, Philippe. The Confessions of the Average: Statistics and Natural Order in Nineteenth-Century French Economic Thought. History of Political Economy, Fall2008, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p447-480.

McCloskey, Deirdre. Adam Smith, the Last of the Former Virtue Ethicists. History of Political Economy, Spring2008, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p43-71.

Depoortère, Christophe. On Ricardo’s Method: The Scottish Connection Considered. History of Political Economy, Spring2008, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p73-110.

Prendergast, Renee. Knowledge and Information in Economics: What Did the Classical Economists Know? History of Political Economy, Winter2007, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p679-712.

Medema, Steven G. The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure. History of Political Economy, Fall2007, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p331-358.

Schabas, Margaret. Adam Smith’s Debts to Nature. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p262-281.

Schabas, Margaret. Adam Smith’s Debts to Nature. History of Political Economy, 2003 Supplement, Vol. 35, p262-281.

 


Дата добавления: 2015-11-04; просмотров: 48 | Нарушение авторских прав




<== предыдущая лекция | следующая лекция ==>
установленные законодательством | Good afternoon! My name is Ekaterina Igorevna. I will be your teacher for today. And first of all, let me get to know with you.

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.032 сек.)