State Institution of Education “Pruzhany Gymnasium”

State Institution of Education “Pruzhany Gymnasium”

“False friends of a translator”

Anna Lapuka

State Institution of Education “Pruzhany Gymnasium”

form 11 “A”

scientific adviser: L.V. Yuk

English teacher

2011
Contents

1. Introduction……………………………………………………………….3

2. Sound form of word and its meanings……………………………………4

3. Words meaning social and political and scientific notions……………….6

4. Words meaning general notions and notions of special character………..7

5. “False friends of a translator”……………………………………………..8

6. Conclusion………………………………………………………………..11

7. Supplement……………………………………………………………….12

8. Bibliography……………………………………………………………...14

Introduction

The history of translation began when the parent language started disintegrating into separate languages, so it indicated the necessity of the people knowing a few languages. Nevertheless translation as a separate science formed only at the beginning of the twentieth century for a number of reasons, particularly for the reason of its interdisciplinary character. It started developing quickly as a result of broadening international relations and changing information. Nowadays translation has taken the status of a separate scientific branch.

From the very beginning it played an important social role: it made possible the communication of people, the spreading of written translations made the cultural achievements of other nations available to all people. But in translations interpreters have a tendency to carry their native language habits into a foreign language system. Such a phenomenon to draw false analogies got the name of “false friends of a translator”.

The actuality of our research consists in the fact that both interpreters and students make a number of mistakes while doing translations. We have put forward the following hypothesis: an interpreter should possess knowledge of stylistic, emotionally-expressive, grammatical characteristics and the peculiarities of lexical combinatory of words, as grammatical and phonetic similarity of languages doesn’t guarantee the quality of translation.

The aim of the work is to define the problems of the phenomenon “false friends of an interpreter”. To reach the aim it’s necessary to fulfill the following points:

· To define the categories of language vocabulary;

· To define the essence and the sources of the origin of the phenomenon “false friends of a translator”;

· To carry out the comparative analysis of lexical units in the process of translation.

The material for our research was used English-Russian and Russian-English Dictionary of False Friends of Interpreter by V.V.Akulenko and some examples found in text-books and the Internet.

Theoretical basis for our research were the woks of V.V.Akulenko, L.S.Barkhudarov, V.N.Komissarov and others.

The materials of our research can be used for optional courses in the technology of translation.

Sound form of word and its meanings

The vocabulary of most languages contains a lot of words which are common for two or three languages.

It can be explained by definite historical reasons: the origin of some languages, communication of nations, borrowings from Greek and Latin.

Common words in compared languages can be alike phonetically or in spelling, but differ in the place of stress and in sounding of some vowel and consonant sounds. It’s natural that the peculiarities of the sound system of the given language give “an international word” its shade.

Consequently, the words of either compared languages (from the point of view their object-logical belonging) can be in the relations of either equivalence or none- equivalence. In consideration of the correlation of sound and graphic aspects of equivalent words and the correlation of their syntagmatic, speech characteristics, it’s possible further to differentiate interlanguage categories of absolute and relative synonymy, homonymy and paronymy. The role of interlanguage synonyms is played by the words of both languages, completely or partially coinciding in meaning and using (and consequently are equivalents in translation). Interlanguage homonyms can be defined the words of both languages which are similar in the degree of identification in sound and graphical aspects but have different meanings. And as interlanguage paronyms should be considered the words of the compared languages which are not completely similar in meaning but can cause false associations in spite of actual difference of their meanings. By-turn interlanguage synonyms can be divided into the ones with external similarity and external difference.

Here are some examples of the words which are alike phonetically and have the same place of stress.

Russian English

Бизнес Business

Файл File

Док Dock

Элеватор Elevator

But most English words with Russian equivalents differ in the place of stress.

English Russian

Interval интервал

Period период

Problem проблема

Secret секрет

In some cases English words are similar to Russian ones only in spelling. But are different in reading.

Russian English

Климат Climate

Пилот Pilot

Радио Radio

But the peculiarities of the vocabulary of every language are mainly in the difference of notions. According to the meaning of borrowed international words which they got in communication, they can be divided into three categories:

· Words with socially-political and scientific meaning;

· Words meaning general and specific notions;

· “False friends of a translator”.

Words meaning social and political and scientific notions

Such words are understandable to everyone speaking a foreign language and there is no necessity in stylistic synonyms. Scientists agree to rate among this group the international words which mean social and political and scientific notions, phenomena. The meanings of such words in two or more compared languages coincide.

For example:

Russian English

Революция Revolution

Республика Republic

Конституция Constitution

Демократический Democratic

Культура Culture

Территория Territory

Математика Mathematics

Диаметр Diameter

Центр Centre

Металл Metal

As a result of science and technology development foreign languages saw the appearance of some Russian words.

Russian English

Спутник Sputnik

And the Russian language got such foreign words as:

English Russian

Computer Компьютер

The Internet Интернет.

Words meaning general notions and notions of special character

Into the second category of international words we put the borrowings which are in the vocabulary of the given language to define the lexical units with a more specific character. In the Russian language along with the borrowed international word we can find its synonym which is normally of a pure Russian origin but with a more extensive meaning mainly used in oral speech.

Borrowings get into the language to denote a new notion in the field of science, culture and everyday life with the help of one word without describing this notion (using a few words).

An unskilled translator often translates “industria” as “индустрия”, “industrial” –“индустриальный” in any context though the Russian language has more habitual lexical units-“промышленность”, “промышленный”.

An international word is used in speech most often in its narrow meaning. So it’s better to translate the word “comfortable”-“удобный” but not “комфортабельный”, “person”-“лицо, человек” but not “персона”.

It should be noted that for being understood by most people it’s necessary to translate using, if possible, simple expressions and words. The exception is special material oriented to a certain circle of people (political, economic, scientific, etc.)

“False friends of a translator”

A group of words known as “false friends of a translator” are reckoned among international words (pseudo cognates). These lexical units have got such a name for the reason of being similar to Russian words in graphic (exterior) form but their translation can lead to a serious mistake and even distort the sense of the sentence if rely on Russian words close in sounding.

Historically “false friends of a translator” are the result of language interaction, which can appear as a casual coincidence but in a limited number of cases. In kin languages they are based on cognates originating in common prototype in basis-language. Firstly the term “false friends of a translator” was introduced in 1928 and meant the results of inadequate and poor translation based on sound similarity of words in foreign and native languages. For example, the English word “bucket” (“ведро”) has the Russian homonym “букет” and is a false equivalent for having a different meaning.

Hereby “false friends of a translator” are lexical units, close graphically and phonetically in the original language and in the target language but different semantically which may mislead a translator. Overwhelming majority of foreign words can be automatically reckoned among “false friends of a translator”. At the same time internationalisms as a rule are not “false friends of a translator”.

At present there are four types of “false friends of a translator”:

· Words and expressions meaning different things in both languages (application-анкета кандидата на должность; аппликация- in Russian; anecdote-случай из жизни; анекдот- in Russian)

· Words and expressions which are partially similar in meaning (apartment- квартира; апартаменты- in Russian; auditorium- зрительный зал; аудитория- Russian)

· Words and expressions similar in meaning but different in style and in sphere of using (cable- канат, трос; кабель)

Words and expressions similar in meaning in both languages but in some expressions their meanings become completely different (experience- ощущение; опыт. Но: проводить опыты; mystery- тайна, загадка. Но: загадать загадку).

Comparing Russian and English it’s possible to find out a considerable amount of words similar graphically and phonetically. These borrowings happen mainly from one language to another or, what is more often, two languages borrow something from the third one: as a rule it’s from Latin, Greek, French (parliament, diplomat, method, theory, organization, etc.)

However being borrowed by another language a word can get new meanings, it’s semantic structure can be completely changed. At first it may seem that “false friends of a translator” can mislead only people having poor knowledge of a language or have recently begun to learn it. In fact the contrary is the case: the basic number of “false friends of a translator” may mislead those who have a good command of language though haven’t reached the level of an adequate unmixed bilingualism and as a result make false identifications of certain units of foreign and native languages.

It’s impossible to disagree with the opinion in some publications that it happens among translators to justify their mistakes and unwillingness to analyze multiple meanings of English words by the existence of “false friends of a translator”. Almost any English word can be considered a “false friend of a translator”. The German language is more monosemantic. The poorer the knowledge of a language the more often a translator catches at a straw at a graphic similarity of words.

But at the same time it’s no good to consider definitely that any mistakes of this kind indicate poor knowledge or carelessness of the speaker while a perfect command of language guarantees no mistakes. Knowledge of the second language in most cases can’t be perfect and fluent speaking two languages is possible only in theory. Hereby, overwhelming majority of people speaking foreign languages make mistakes in translation and using words (though to a different degree). The main sources of such mistakes are the correlations of functional and sound similarity or seeming identity of lexical units in both languages. Particularly in the field of lexicology these are “false friends of a translator” which disorient translators most often. So the word “ammunition” (“заряды, боеприпасы”) is quite often translated as “амуниция” which in Russian means “снаряжение военнослужащего” (except arms and clothes).

Important place among “false friends of a translator” is occupied by the cases of interlanguage homonymy and paronymy. Interlanguage homonymy may arise in the process of interaction and comparison of languages (for example, “mark”-марка or “family”-фамилия. Fully homonymous in modern using).

The differences in object-logical content of English and Russian “false friends of a translator” in a number of cases are connected with the difference in the life of peoples itself. In this case it will be useful to pay attention to the commentaries on the actuals without which any language comparisons are defective. For example, for the right translation it’s necessary to know the following meanings of the word “academy”: 1) специальные школы для взрослых (academies of music, of riding, etc.); 2) училища, занимающие промежуточное положение между средней и высшей школой (military, naval academies); 3) в прошлом- частные школы для детей богатых родителей. That’s why it’s not right to use this word to speak about our institutes of higher education which it is sometimes better to call “colleges”.

Besides it’s necessary to take into consideration possible differences of stylistic characteristics of associating words. These differences can accompany partial semantic differences but can occur in the words with the same meanings. So it’s impossible to understand and use the word correctly without knowing its functional-stylistic and emotionally-expressive shades. The differences in functional-stylistic shades occur most often in English-Russian comparisons. For example, even in the similar meaning “совещание специалистов” the English variant “consultation” and the Russian one “консультация” are not quite similar as the first word is stylistically neutral and the second word has a bookish shade. Stylistic difference makes a lot of words absolutely incompatible in translation.

The essential type of stylistic differences are the differences in evaluative and emotionally-expressive shades. If the English word “compilation” (собирание, составление) is quite neutral here but the Russian word “компиляция” has a shade of disapproval meaning the work based on the materials of other authors. Emotional shades often become apparent in figurative meanings: let’s take, for example, the using of such Russian words as “субъект”, “тип”, “фрукт”, “элемент”, “экземпляр” in the meaning of “человек, личность”.

Conclusion

In spite of the fact that the problem of “false friends of a translator” attracts attention of a number of translators, still there is no detailed research of this group of words in most languages. If not to touch upon concise mentioning in some articles, on the Internet and some academic issues there are only bilingual dictionaries on the material of French and English, Spanish and French, German and French, Spanish and Russian, English and Russian, Russian and Polish. The differences in lexical combinatory make serious difficulties in learning languages and in translation but as a rule are not described in bilingual dictionaries. But at the same time it is supposed that such difficulties are always surmountable in translation as the translator, using his linguistic feeling, “feels” in what combinations the word is relevant. It works mainly in the native language and is less successful in a foreign one. But the situation is complicated by the circumstances that the preference can be given to this or that word in this combination basing on language tradition. The dictionaries of “false friends of a translator” don’t strive to substitute classical bilingual dictionaries, they are collections of peculiar and rather valuable commentaries on the words in question. Such commentaries are directed at preventing mistakes when using a foreign language and sometimes at improving the quality of translation and even broadening our outlook. In theory and practice the dictionaries of “false friends of a translator” are more useful as give the description of all meanings, express stylistic and emotionally-expressive shades, explain grammar characteristics and lexical combinatory which is really important in translation.

Hereby, for an adequate translation a specialist should take into consideration the general idea of a sentence, the specifics of lexical combinatory of words, the style and the general contents of the text.

Supplement

• academic — учёный, работающий в университетской системе, а не академик (academician) — звание учёного в научной иерархии и ученый, обладающий этим званием;
• accurate — точный, а не аккуратный в значении «опрятный» (tidy);
• aggressive — энергичный, инициативный, а не только агрессивный (например, aggressive salesman);
• alley — переулок, а не только аллея; blind alley — тупик;
• ammunition — боеприпасы, а не амуниция;
• anecdote — интересный или поучительный случай из жизни известных людей, а не анекдот в современном значении слова (joke);
• argument — также спор, а не только аргумент
• artist — художник, живописец, а не только артист
• audience — это как правило аудитория — публика в зале наблюдающая за происходящим на сцене, а не только аудиенция
• brilliant — блестящий, а не бриллиантовый;
• cabinet — шкаф (а также Кабинет Министров), но не кабинет (комната);
• cable — трос (не только кабель);
• chef — шеф-повар (а не шеф — chief, boss, patron);
• collector — коллекционер, а не только коллектор;
• compositor — наборщик, а не композитор (composer, musician);
• conductor — дирижёр, гид, проводник (электропроводный материал), а также ж.-д. проводник, погонщик, дирижёр, интендант, а не только кондуктор
• decade — 10 лет (а не Декада − 10 дней);
• director — глава, режиссёр, дирижёр, духовный отец (не только директор, руководитель компании);
• dock — причал, пристань (не только док — помещение для ремонта кораблей);
• episode 1 — часть 1, выпуск 1, серия 1 (не только эпизод 1);
• figure — чеpтёж, иллюстрация; цифра; число (не только фигура);
• gallant — храбрый (не только галантный);
• general — основной, общий, обычный (не только генеральный);
• intelligent — умный, интеллектуальный (а не интеллигентный);
• lift — поднятие, подъём, поднимать, повышать (а не только лифт — elevator (амер, кан.), lift(брит). также означает украсть, стянуть, стащить);
• magazine — журнал (не научный), а не магазин — shop, store;
• master — хозяин (а не только мастер);
• mystery — тайна, и лишь в редких случаях мистерия;
• novel — роман (чаще, чем новелла); это слово очень часто переводят неправильно;
• original — настоящий, подлинный, изначальный (не только оригинальный);
• paragraph — не только параграф, но и абзац;
• partisan — партиец; протазан (копьё с широким плоским наконечником), а не только партизан;
• party — также и вечеринка (не только партия);
• patron — спонсор, уважаемый клиент (а не патрон), не только в значении босса;
• principal — директор школы, колледжа, ректор ВУЗа, а также ведущий актёр или солист в труппе (а не принципиальный — principle);
• realize — чётко представлять, осознавать (а не только реализовывать);
• regular — нормальный, обычный, стандартный (а не только регулярный; regular water — простая (питьевая) вода, а не регулярная);
• romance — рыцарский стихотворный роман (не только романс);
• silicon — кремний (а не силикон — silicone). См. Силиконовая долина — ошибочное, но общепринятое в русском языке название.
• student — учащийся вообще, а не только студент;
• sympathetic — сочувствующий, сочувственный (а не только «симпатичный»);
• sympathy — чаще всего сочувствие, а не симпатия в значении «влечение, внутреннее расположение к кому-, чему-л.»; легко запоминается, если обратиться к этимологии слова: sym- — со-, вместе + pathos — чувство; отсюда: слова с идентичным смыслом sympathetic, sympathize и пр.
• technique — способ, методика, метод; также техника в смысле «набор приёмов» (техника в прямом смысле обозначается словом technics);
• tunic — также мундир, а не только туника;
• universal — всемирный, а не только универсальный;
• virtual — действительный, фактический, а не только виртуальный

Bibliography

1. Бархударов Л.С. Язык и перевод. М.,1975.
2. Гарбовский Н.К. Теория перевода. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2004.
3. Комиссаров В.Н., Кораллова А.Л. Практикум по переводу с английского на русский. М., 1990.
4. Комиссаров В.Н. Современное переводоведение. М.: ЭТС, 2002.
5. Кораллова А.Л., Романова С.П. Пособие по переводу с английского языка на русский. М.: Мозаика, 1995.
6. Левицкая Т.Р., Фитерман А.М. Проблемы перевода (на материале современного английского языка). М., 1976.
7. Слепович В.С. Курс перевода (английский-русский). Мн.: «ТетраСистемс». 2002.

8. Акуленко В.В. Англо-русский и русско-английский словарь ложных друзей переводчика. М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1969.
9. Рум Р.У. Адриан. Лингвострановедческий словарь Великобритании. М.: Русский язык, 2002.
10. Ушаков Д.Н. Большой толковый словарь современного русского языка. М.: Альта-Принт, 2006.
11. Словарь иностранных слов. М.: Русский язык, 2007

Дата добавления: 2015-08-28