Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Process flows and RACI

Capacity Management | IT Service Continuity Management | Change, Release and Deployment Management | Knowledge Management | CSI activities and skills required | Service Manager | CSI Manager | Service Owner | Service Knowledge Management | Reporting analyst |


Читайте также:
  1. Deming Cycle used for improving services and service management processes
  2. Integration with the rest of the lifecycle stages and service management processes
  3. Process changes
  4. Process Explorer
  5. Processes
  6. Service management process measurement

In order to fully understand an authority matrix we must first begin with an example of a high-level process flow diagram. As an example see Figure 6.2 for a high-level process flow for Change Management.

Figure 6.2 Change Management high-level process flow

Each of the major activities is then expanded into a detailed flow of specific procedures, tasks and work instruction s. As an example, the fourth major activity (Authorize Change) is expanded in Figure 6.3.

Figure 6.3 Change Management detailed process flow example: change authorization

Utilizing the detailed Change Management process flow shown in Figure 6.2, an example authority matrix is created based on the RACI model to illustrate the linkage between many of the roles we have discussed, the detailed procedures, and the level of responsibility assigned to each role in the successful execution of the procedure and, moving up, the process.

  Process Roles Customer Change Sponsor Service Desk Change Manager Change Coordinator CAB CAB/EC Change Builder Change Tester IT Management Board Business Executive Board
Flow # Activity within process                      
1.0 Change Manager determines level of risk C C C R/A C            
1.1 Level 4 – Standard change Local authorization   C   R/A I            
1.2 Level 3 – affects only local or service groups RFC to CAB for assessment   C   R/A   C/I          
1.3 Level 2 – affects multiple services or organizational divisions RFC to IT Management Board for assessment   C   R/A   C       C/I  
1.4 Level 1 – high-cost/high-risk change RFC to Business Executive Board for assessment   C   R/A             C/I
2.0 Endorsed? Yes – go to 2.1 No – go to 3.1       R/I   I          
2.1 CAB members estimate impact and resources, confirm priority, schedule changes       A   R   C      
3.0 Authorized? Not authorized – go to 3.1 Authorized – go to 3.2 I I I A I R          
3.1 RFC rejected and closed (Initiator informed with a brief explanation of why it was rejected) I I   A R I I        
3.2 Change builder builds change, devises back-out and testing plan s I I   I C     A/R I    
Legend
R = Responsible Responsible for executing the task
A = Accountable Accountable for the final result
C = Consulted Consulted about the task to provide additional information
I = Informed Needs to be kept up-to-date on activities/tasks
                           

Table 6.10 RACI matrix – sample Change Management authority matrix based on process flow


Дата добавления: 2015-10-02; просмотров: 78 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
The authority matrix| Summary

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.013 сек.)