The political role of the monarchy.

Great Britain is a constitutional monarchy. The head of state is Queen Elizabeth II. The queen reigns, but does not rule. Britain does not have a written constitution, but a set of laws. Parliament is the most important authority in Britain.

Parliament makes the laws of Great Britain. It consists of the queen, the House of Commons, and the House of Lords. In reality the House of Commons is the only one of the three, which has true power.

The Monarch serves formally as head of state. But the Monarch is expected to be politically neutral and should not make political decisions. The present sovereign of Great Britain is Queen Elizabeth II (the second). She was crowned in Westminster Abbey in 1953.

She has a role in the political life of the nation. She opens and dissolves parliament. She gives her assent to all legislation by signing parliamentary bills so they become law. She asks someone to be prime minister after a general election. She has a weekly audience with the prime minister.

This role is neutral. The monarch stands above politics and has to be careful to be non-partisan. She has, in fact, by law, the right to take a more active role – to refuse to sign new legislation, for example, but by convention she never makes use of this right. When the queen opens the new session of parliament each year she reads a speech saying what the government wants to do, but she has not written it – the prime minister has. She does not make her opinions known on political issues. The only area where the monarch’s role could be unclear, and controversial, is when she has to decide who to send for to ask to be prime minister. Generally speaking, the monarch’s political functions today are formal and visible, but extremely weak. Indeed this very weakness puts her completely above party politics and is, many would say, a source of strength because it allows her to play a larger role as a national symbol. It is this role we shall now briefly examine.

The royal family is also the most famous family in the country. In the 20th century it tried to set a good example of family life. This task proved impossible. The change in their attitude to divorce is the clearest sign of this. In the 1950s the queen’s sister, Princess Margaret, did not marry the man she loved because he was divorced. Later that same sister herself got divorced, as did three of the queen’s children. You could say that the norms of society changed and that the royal family simply changed with them; harsher critics would say that the royal family at times resembles a poorly directed soap opera.

Дата добавления: 2015-11-14