Студопедия
Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АрхитектураБиологияГеографияДругоеИностранные языки
ИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураМатематика
МедицинаМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогика
ПолитикаПравоПрограммированиеПсихологияРелигия
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоФизикаФилософия
ФинансыХимияЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Text 6 Two steps to primate social living

Experimentation and hypothesizing | Certainty and science | Science policy | Philosophical critiques | Text 3 First general-purpose computers | Text 6 Higher-level languages and program design | Discussion Questions | Suggested Readings | QUANTUM COMPUTERS | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |


Читайте также:
  1. A. Corruption and violations of economic and social rights
  2. ACCOUNTING AS A SOCIAL SCIENCE
  3. AGENTS OF SOCIALIZATION
  4. AGENTS OF SOCIALIZATION
  5. Aspects of Corporate Sustainability and Corporate (Social) Responsibility
  6. Black Death. Its social and historical impact.
  7. Boyd, danah, & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

 

Scientists are learning more about how crab-eating macaques (shown grooming) and other primates abandoned the single lifestyle to form the large, stable societies the creatures live in today.Roy Fontaine

Primates may have evolved from living the lonely life to forming complex societies in two major steps, a new study of more than 200 species suggests. Understanding when and why the ancestors of Homo sapiens and its closest cousins adopted different social structures could help reveal more about the evolution of human society.

About 52 million years ago, primates — an order of animals that includes, among others, humans and great apes — might have stopped foraging alone and banded together in large, loosely formed, same-sex groups to search for food, anthropologist Susanne Shultz of the University of Oxford and colleagues report in the Nov. 10 Nature. Then around 16 million years ago, primates began forming more stable social groups, such as male-female pairs and harems dominated by one male, the researchers suggest.

Teaming up this way may have been prompted by a switch from a nocturnal lifestyle to moving about in the sunshine. “Being active during the day would have allowed primates to travel across larger spaces and exploit their environment more effectively, but it would have also exposed them to a huge predation risk,” says Shultz. To make it through the day, primates would have needed a new defense strategy to deal with both a greater number of predators and also new kinds of hunters.

“What’s going to nail you at night is different than what’s going to nail you during the day,” says primatologist Anthony Di Fiore of the University of Texas at Austin, who was not involved in the study. It’s tough to hide from eagle eyes in the daytime, but by joining up and serving as lookouts for each other primates would have given themselves a better chance of spotting and evading a swooping bird or other predator.

Re-creating the social behavior of animals that died millions of years ago can be tricky business. However, since behaviors are inherited, examining the ways living species interact socially can provide clues to the ways their ancestors behaved.

Shultz and colleagues examined the social behavior of 217 species of living primates, such as baboons, gibbons, and tamarins. Combining this data with information about primates’ evolutionary tree, the researchers made predictions about the likely transitions the creatures underwent between foraging alone and forming the complex societies evident in modern-day primates.

“We asked the data to tell us what the most likely transition was,” says Shultz. The researchers found that the most likely route primates took to learn today’s cooperative behavior involved two discrete evolutionary jumps in social behavior. Ancestral primates didn’t alter their social strategies freely depending on changing habitats, nor did they incrementally increase the size and complexity of their clans over time, the researchers argue.

To get a broader picture of the evolution of cooperative social systems, the next step is to test these transition theories in other mammals, say Shultz and colleagues. The development of sociality in primates may provide clues to social behavior in humans. “If we didn’t have these social groups evolving in primates, we wouldn’t have the scaffolding in place for humans to build upon,” says Shultz.

Text 7 Tiniest car gets a test drive

 

ON A ROLLA mini four-wheeled vehicle rolls across a surface when zapped with electricity that contorts the wheels’ axle.Randy Wind/Martin Roelfs; Nature

Scientists have created the tiniest electric car ever — although it won’t be coming to your local dealership anytime soon. With four molecular wheels and a carbon-based frame, the mini-roadster is a step toward devices that mimic the machinery of molecular life.

The researchers started with little motorized “wheels,” molecules inspired by the motors that some bacteria use to propel themselves, and attached them to a frame. A carbon double bond serves as an axle between two wheels; when the entire unit is zapped with electricity, the double bond becomes a single bond. This contorts the axle, rotating the wheels and propelling the car forward, researchers report in the Nov. 10 Nature. In test drives on a copper surface the car went as far as 20 nanometers, says organic chemist Ben Feringa — about 10 car lengths.

Designing a contraption that will do your bidding in the nanoworld is not so easy, says Feringa, of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. With regular-sized cars, forces such as gravity dictate interactions with the road. But a vehicle that’s nanometers long — about the width of a DNA molecule — must contend with different forces.

“The interactions with the surface are very important,” Feringa says. “The key is to not make it stick to the surface, because it will never move, but also it cannot fly away.”

Another difficulty of working at the nanoscale is when molecules are close together they interact, and not necessarily in the way that you want, says Paul Weiss, director of the California NanoSystems Institute at UCLA.

“The biggest thing here is these four motors operating together,” says Weiss, who wrote a commentary accompanying the Nature article. “It’s really terrific work.”

Nature is adept at making such minimachines. There are proteins that transport cargo inside cells, others that help muscles move and pumps that provide energy. Building similar molecules that cooperate and carry out tasks could lead to all sorts of machines and uses, Weiss says.

There are still kinks to iron out before these little cars can be mass-produced efficiently. The molecular machines are made in a solution that’s then poured on the copper surface, and only cars that land right-side-up are drivable. But such production issues should be relatively easy to overcome, says Weiss.

“We’re really learning the forces and the lay of the land at the nanoscale,” he says.

The researchers would like to see whether they can propel the machines with light rather than electricity, says Feringa, and also plan to add cargo to see whether the vehicles can carry a load

 

 

Week 8 Science projects


Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 77 | Нарушение авторских прав


<== предыдущая страница | следующая страница ==>
Text 1 Rethinking the Science System| Best Science Project ideas recommended for 2008-2009 school year

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2024 год. (0.006 сек.)